Resident Presence and Burglary: A Spatiotemporal Exploration of Guardianship Patterns Using Mobile Phone Tracking Data as a Measure of Ambient Population
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2026
Resident Presence and Burglary: A Spatiotemporal Exploration of Guardianship Patterns Using Mobile Phone Tracking Data as a Measure of Ambient Population
This study examines the routine activity theory’s capable guardianship concept using contemporary GIS data. Leveraging high-frequency geotracked mobile phone data from Advan, which provides ambient population counts for census block groups every 2 hr, the research tests the impact of residents’ presence on burglary frequency at different times of the day and week. Through a series of negative binomial regression and GS2SLS models, significant variations in deterrence provided by such capable guardianship are revealed across different times of the day, as well as between weekdays and weekends. Highlighting the novelty and utility of mobile phone tracking data, the research offers insights into the temporal dynamics of residential burglary, informing targeted crime prevention strategies, enhancing community safety, and advancing criminological theory.
AllisonP. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press.
2.
AndresenM. A. (2006). Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), 258–285.
3.
AndresenM. A.CurmanA. S.LinningS. J. (2017). The trajectories of crime at places: Understanding the patterns of disaggregated crime types. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 427–449.
4.
AndresenM. A.JenionG. W. (2010). Ambient populations and the calculation of crime rates and risk. Security Journal, 23, 114–133.
ArmitageR. (2013). Crime prevention through housing design: Policy and practice. Springer.
7.
BeatonA.CookM.KavanaghM.HerringtonC. (2000). The psychological impact of burglary. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6(1), 33–43.
8.
BernascoW.BlockR. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47(1), 93–130.
9.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press.
10.
BoivinR.FelsonM. (2018). Crimes by visitors versus crimes by residents: The influence of visitor inflows. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 465–480.
11.
BragaA. A.ClarkeR. V. (2014). Explaining high-risk concentrations of crime in the city: Social disorganization, crime opportunities, and important next steps. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814521217
12.
ChenX.RafailP. (2020). Do housing vacancies induce more crime? A spatiotemporal regression analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 66(11), 1579–1605.
13.
ChengZ.CaverleeJ.LeeK.SuiD. (2011, July17–21). Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services [Conference session]. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (Vol. 5, pp. 81–88).
14.
ClarkeR. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.
15.
ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (2017). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
16.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
17.
CranshawJ.SchwartzR.HongJ.SadehN. (2012, June4–8). The livehoods project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city [Conference session]. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Dublin, Ireland (Vol. 6, pp. 58–65).
18.
CrumJ. D.RameyD. M. (2023). Impact of extralegal and community factors on police officers’ decision to book arrests for minor offenses. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(3), 572–601.
19.
EckJ. E.ClarkeR. V. (2019). Situational crime prevention: Theory, practice and evidence. In KrohnM.HendrixN.HallG.LizotteA. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 355–376). Springer.
20.
ElhorstJ. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. Crime and place, 4, 53–66.
24.
FelsonM. (2006). Crime and nature. Sage publications.
25.
FelsonM. (2017). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. In NatarajanM. (Ed.), Crime opportunity theories (pp. 91–111). Routledge.
26.
FelsonM.BobaR. L. (2010). Crime and everyday life. Sage.
27.
FelsonM.CohenL. E. (1980). Human-ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology, 8(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01561001
28.
FelsonM.EckertM. A. (2018). Crime and everyday life: A brief introduction. Sage Publications.
29.
FelsonM.PoulsenE. (2003). Simple indicators of crime by time of day. International Journal of Forecasting, 19(4), 595–601.
30.
GarofaloJ. (1981). The fear of crime: Causes and consequences. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 72, 839.
31.
GhoshT.AndersonS. J.ElvidgeC. D.SuttonP. C. (2013). Using nighttime satellite imagery as a proxy measure of human well-being. Sustainability, 5(12), 4988–5019.
32.
GroffE. R.La VigneN. G. (2002). Forecasting the future of predictive crime mapping. Crime Prevention Studies, 13, 29–58.
33.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 659–680.
34.
HippJ. R.BatesC.LichmanM.SmythP. (2019). Using social media to measure temporal ambient population: Does it help explain local crime rates?Justice Quarterly, 36(4), 718–748.
35.
HippJ. R.KimY.-A. (2019). Explaining the temporal and spatial dimensions of robbery: Differences across measures of the physical and social environment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 1–12.
36.
HippJ. R.WilliamsS. A. (2020). Advances in spatial criminology: The spatial scale of crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 75–95.
37.
Hollis-PeelM. E.ReynaldD. M.Van BavelM.ElffersH.WelshB. C. (2011). Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56, 53–70.
38.
Hollis-PeelM. E.WelshB. C. (2014). What makes a guardian capable? A test of guardianship in action. Security Journal, 27, 320–337.
39.
IsaacmanS.BeckerR.CáceresR.KobourovS.MartonosiM.RowlandJ.VarshavskyA. (2011, March 21–25). Ranges of human mobility in Los Angeles and New York [Conference session]. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM workshops), Seattle, WA.
40.
KorotchenkoS.SemukhinaO. (2024). Crime, space, and race: A spatial analysis of assaults with victim race and residence as predictors. Crime & Delinquency, 70(11), 3074–3101. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221150178
41.
KunstM.HoekD. (2024). Psychological distress among domestic burglary victims: A systematic review of possible risk and protective factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 430–447.
42.
KurokiM. (2013). Crime victimization and subjective well-being: Evidence from happiness data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 783–794.
43.
LiZ.NingH.JingF.LessaniM. N. (2024). Understanding the bias of mobile location data across spatial scales and over time: A comprehensive analysis of SafeGraph data in the United States. PLoS ONE, 19(1), e0294430.
44.
LongD.LiuL.XuM.FengJ.ChenJ.HeL. (2021). Ambient population and surveillance cameras: The guardianship role in street robbers’ crime location choice. Cities, 115, Article 103223.
45.
MallesonN.AndresenM. A. (2015). The impact of using social media data in crime rate calculations: Shifting hot spots and changing spatial patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(2), 112–121.
46.
OkmiM.PorL. Y.AngT. F.Al-HusseinW.KuC. S. (2023). A systematic review of mobile phone data in crime applications: A coherent taxonomy based on data types and analysis perspectives, challenges, and future research directions. Sensors, 23(9), 4350.
47.
PalmerJ. R.EspenshadeT. J.BartumeusF.ChungC. Y.OzgencilN. E.LiK. (2013). New approaches to human mobility: Using mobile phones for demographic research. Demography, 50(3), 1105–1128.
48.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (1999). Racial segregation, the concentration of disadvantage, and black and white homicide victimization. Sociological Forum, 14(3), 465–49.
49.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2002). Aoristic signatures and the spatio-temporal analysis of high volume crime patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 23–43.
50.
ReynaldD. M. (2011). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 110–142.
51.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
52.
SemukhinaO.KorotchenkoS.TsangY.DinulescuC.FincherI. (2024). Revising what we know about spatial predictors of violent victimization: A comprehensive analysis of differential effects of spatial predictors of robbery victimization for victims of different ethnic backgrounds. Victims & Offenders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2024.2329754
53.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–56.
54.
ShermanL. W.WeisburdD. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.
55.
SkoganW. G. (1992). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. University of California Press.
56.
SnowdenA. J. (2019). Exploring violence: The role of neighborhood characteristics, alcohol outlets, and other micro-places. Social Science Research, 82, 181-–194.
TseloniA.ThompsonR.TilleyN.ArmitageR. (2018). Domestic burglary: Burglar responses to target attractiveness. In TseloniA.ThompsonR.TilleyN. (Eds.), Reducing Burglary (pp. 45–75). Springer.
59.
TseloniA.WittebroodK.FarrellG.PeaseK. (2004). Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands: A cross-national comparative test of routine activities and lifestyle theories. British Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 66–91.
Van WilsemJ. (2009). Urban streets as micro contexts to commit violence. In WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology (pp. 199–216). Springer.
VuongQ. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57, 307–333.
65.
WangZ.HeS. Y.LeungY. (2018). Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research: A literature review. Travel Behaviour and Society, 11, 141–155.
66.
WeisburdD.GroffE. R.YangS.-M. (2014). Understanding and controlling hot spots of crime: The importance of formal and informal social controls. Prevention Science, 15, 31–43.
67.
WeisburdD.HinkleJ. C.BragaA. A.WooditchA. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms underlying broken windows policing: The need for evaluation evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(4), 589–608.
68.
WoJ. C.RogersE. M.BergM. T.KoyluC. (2024). Recreating human mobility patterns through the lens of social media: Using twitter to model the social ecology of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 70(8), 1943–1970.
69.
XuY.BelyiA.BojicI.RattiC. (2018). Human mobility and socioeconomic status: Analysis of Singapore and Boston. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 72, 51–67.
70.
ZhouH.LiuL.LanM.ZhuW.SongG.JingF.ZhongY.SuZ.GuX. (2021). Using Google Street View imagery to capture micro built environment characteristics in drug places, compared with street robbery. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 88, Article 101631.
71.
ZhouX.XuC. (2017). Tracing the spatial-temporal evolution of events based on social media data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(3), 88.
