Abstract
Terrorist lethality has emerged as a key metric for evaluating counterterrorism success. Recent research, however, questions whether terrorist mass casualty events (TMCEs) are consistent with existing theories of terrorism and across heterogeneous terrorist ideological motivations. This study examines previously understudied control and learning theories and their impact on the likelihood of TMCEs from 1983 to 2020. Leveraging the Profiles on Individual Radicalization in the United States (PIRUS) dataset, this study examines the causal conditions associated with TMCEs using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Across the three ideological motivations examined, too many unique pathways to TMCEs emerged to suggest support for either theoretical perspective. Further, some conditions, including education, were both risk and protective factors suggesting important unexplained heterogeneity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
