Risk-contamination and Dilution: Advancing the RNR Model in Prison Settings

Abstract

The Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model posits separating lower from higher-risk individuals to avoid “risk contamination.” In a prison setting, policies and restrictions lead to mixing different populations within a housing unit. While this may pose a threat, it may allow higher-risk individuals to gradually promote through security levels, reducing risk. We term this “risk dilution.” The current study compares the infraction behavior of individuals that are over-classified (housed higher than their risk) and those under-classified (housed lower than their risk). Using mixed-effect models with a large (N = 52,000) sample of incarcerated men, findings demonstrate support for both contamination and dilution. Policy implications identify the impact of these two processes on overcrowded prisons and the consolidation of housing units post decarceration.

Keywords

risk contamination classification prison management decarceration misconduct

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acevedo

K. C.

Bakken

(2003). Women adjusting to prison. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 17(4), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v17n04_03

Alexander

(2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27.

Andrews

D. A.

Dowden

(2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05282556

Andrews

D. A.

Zinger

Hoge

R. D.

Bonta

(1990). A human science approach or more punishment and pessimism: A rejoinder to Lab and Whitehead. Criminology, 28, 419.

Austin

Hardyman

P. L.

(2021). Objective prison classification: A guide for correctional agencies (2nd ed.). US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.

Barnes

G. C.

Ahlman

Gill

Sherman

L. W.

Kurtz

Malvestuto

(2010). Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(2), 159–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9094-4

Bischof

(2021, October 20). New data reveals trends in Nebraska prison overcrowding. KOLN.

10.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2016). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

11.

Bosma

A. Q. C.

Van Ginneken

E. F. J.

Sentse

Palmen

(2020). Examining prisoner misconduct: A multilevel test using personal characteristics, prison climate, and prison environment. Crime & Delinquency, 66(4), 451–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719877347

12.

Byrne

J. M.

Pattavina

Taxman

F. S.

(2015). International trends in prison upsizing and downsizing: In search of evidence of a global rehabilitation revolution. Victims & Offenders, 10(4), 420–451.

13.

Camp

S. D.

Gaes

G. G.

Langan

N. P.

Saylor

W. G.

(2003). The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 501–533.

14.

Carson

E. A.

(2021). Prisoners in 2020–Statistical tables (NCJ 302776).

15.

Caudill

J. W.

Trulson

C. R.

Marquart

J. W.

Patten

Thomas

M. O.

Anderson

(2014). Correctional destabilization and jail violence: The consequences of prison depopulation legislation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 500–506.

16.

Cécile

Born

(2009). Intervention in juvenile delinquency: Danger of iatrogenic effects? Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1217–1221.

17.

Council of State Governments. (2015). Nebraska’s Justice Reinvestment: Analysis and Policy Framework. The Counsels of State Governments Justice Center.Crime & Justice Institute. (2022). Nebraska criminal justice reinvestment working group.

18.

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

Stewart

E. A.

(2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044–1073.

19.

Dewberry (2023) Nebraska Department of Correctional Services 2022 Master Plan: Final report. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

20.

Dowden

Andrews

D. A.

(2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(4), 449–467.

21.

Duwe

(2020). The development and validation of a classification system predicting severe and frequent prison misconduct. The Prison Journal, 100(2), 173–200.

22.

Duwe

Clark

(2017). The rehabilitative ideal versus the criminogenic reality: The consequences of warehousing prisoners. Corrections, 2(1), 41.

23.

Fazel

Hurton

Burghart

DeLisi

(2024). An updated evidence synthesis on the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model: Umbrella review and commentary. Journal of Criminal Justice, 92, 102197.

24.

Fritz

C. O.

Morris

P. E.

Richler

J. J.

(2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2.

25.

Garland

Hogan

Wodahl

Hass

Stohr

M. K.

Lambert

(2014). Decarceration and its possible effects on inmates, staff, and communities. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514539535

26.

Ghandnoosh

(2023). Ending 50 years of mass incarceration: Urgent reform needed to protect future generations (50 Years and a Wake Up: Ending the Mass Incarceration Crisis in America, Issue. The Sentencing Project.

27.

Glazener

Nakamura

(2020). Examining the link between prison crowding and inmate misconduct: Evidence from prison-level panel data. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1495251

28.

Griffin

M. L.

Hepburn

J. R.

(2006). The effect of gang affiliation on violent misconduct among inmates during the early years of confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(4), 419–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806288038

29.

Griffin

M. L.

Hepburn

J. R.

(2013). Inmate misconduct and the institutional capacity for control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812457920

30.

Hamilton

Kigerl

(2016). Development and validation of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Prison Classification System. University of Nebraska- Omaha.

31.

Hamilton

Kigerl

Allen-Flores

Kobie

Ursino

Krushas

Gildea

Spohn

R. E.

(2024). Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Classification and crowding project technical report (Reports 108). https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ncjrreports/108

32.

Isenhardt

Hostettler

(2020). Inmate violence and correctional staff burnout: The role of sense of security, gender, and job characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(1–2), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516681156

33.

Lahm

(2016). Official incidents of inmate-on-inmate misconduct at a women’s prison: Using importation and deprivation theories to compare perpetrators to victims. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601x.2016.1154263

34.

Lerman

A. E.

Mooney

A. C.

(2022). The downside of downsizing: Persistence of racial disparities following state prison reform. Punishment & Society, 24(4), 667–691.

35.

Lovell

Jemelka

(1996). When inmates misbehave: The costs of discipline. The Prison Journal, 76(2), 165–179.

36.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Latessa

E. J.

(2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. Topics in Community Corrections, 2004, 3–8.

37.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Latessa

E. J.

(2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 263–290.

38.

Martin

W. G.

(2016). Decarceration and justice disinvestment: Evidence from New York state. Punishment & Society, 18(4), 479–504.

39.

Mears

D. P.

Pesta

G. B.

Aranda-Hughes

(2021). Views from the inside: Insights about restrictive housing from prison system officials, officers, and staff. The Prison Journal, 101(6), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211060308

40.

Ostermann

(2022). Recidivism of low-risk people that receive residential community-based correctional programs: The role of risk contamination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(5), 659–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221078020

41.

Pettus-Davis

Epperson

M. W.

(2015). From mass incarceration to smart decarceration. American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare.

42.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

Sellers

C. S.

Thomas Winfree

Madensen

T. D.

Daigle

L. E.

Fearn

N. E.

Gau

J. M.

(2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610

43.

Prendergast

M. L.

Pearson

F. S.

Podus

Hamilton

Z. K.

Greenwell

(2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 275–300.

44.

Reisig

M. D.

Mesko

(2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802089768

45.

Rocheleau

A. M.

(2013). An empirical exploration of the “pains of imprisonment” and the level of prison misconduct and violence. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016813494764

46.

Skarbek

(2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford University Press.

47.

Steiner

Butler

H. D.

Ellison

J. M.

(2014). Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.001

48.

Steiner

Wooldredge

(2008). Inmate versus environmental effects on prison rule violations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 438–456.

49.

Tahamont

(2019). The effect of facility security classification on serious rules violation reports in california prisons: A regression discontinuity design. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(4), 767–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09405-0

50.

Toch

(1977). Living in prison: The ecology of survival. Free Press.

51.

Wooldredge

(2020). Prison culture, management, and in-prison violence. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041359

52.

Wooldredge

Griffin

Pratt

(2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 203–231.

53.

Wormith

J. S.

(1984). Attitude and behavior change of correctional clientele: A three year follow-up. Criminology, 22(4), 595–618.

54.

Worrall

J. L.

Morris

R. G.

(2011). Inmate custody levels and prison rule violations. The Prison Journal, 91(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511404380