Situational crime prevention (SCP) is one of criminology’s more misunderstood theoretical perspectives, despite it being widely implemented in the practice of criminal justice. Since its introduction some critics have alleged that SCP is theoretically weak, oppositional to traditional criminology (TC), ideologically conservative and a tool of the powerful. The repercussions of these beliefs can be seen across different dimensions of academia, from basic criminological pedagogy to theory critique and development. We argue that these allegations are misperceptions stemming from core misunderstandings of SCP, and the related rational choice perspective (RCP). Rather than being fundamentally different from TC, SCP, and the RCP are well-positioned for rich theoretical integration with an array of traditional theories, including learning, control, strain, and other theories.
AkersR. (1990). Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 653–676.
2.
AndresenM. A.FelsonM. (2010). The impact of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 66–81.
3.
BacharachS. B. (1989). Organization theories: Some criteria for evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–151.
4.
BanduraA. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall.
5.
BarrR.PeaseK. (1990). Crime placement, displacement, and deflection. Crime and Justice, 12, 277–318.
6.
BouffardJ. (2013). The role of sexual arousal and perceived consequences in men’s and women’s decisions to engage in sexually coercive behaviors. In Van GelderJ. L.ElffersH.ReynaldD.NaginD. (Eds.), Affect and cognitions in criminal decision making (pp. 77–96). Routledge.
7.
BowersK.JohnsonS. (2005). Using publicity for preventive purposes. In TilleyN. (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 329–354). Willan Publishing.
8.
BragaA.ClarkeR. V. (2014). Explaining high-risk concentrations of crime in the city: Social disorganization, crime opportunities and important next steps. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 480–498.
9.
BursikR. J.Jr. (2009). The Dead Sea Scrawls and criminological knowledge: 2008 Presidential address to the American Society of Criminology. Criminology, 47(1), 5–16.
10.
CavalloA.DrummondA. (1994). Evaluation of the Victorian random breath testing initiative. In SouthD.CavalloA. (Eds.), Australian drunk driving conference 1993, Conference proceedings (pp. 9–19). Vicroads.
11.
ChiuY. N.LeclercB.ReynaldD. M.WortleyR. (2021). Situational crime prevention in offenses against women: Offenders tell us what works and what doesn’t. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(9), 1055–1076.
12.
ClarkeR. V. (2005). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention. In TilleyN. (Ed.) Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 39–70). Willan Publishing.
13.
ClarkeR. V. (2014). Affect and the reasoning criminal: Past and future. In van GelderJ. L.ElffersH.ReynaldD.NaginD. (Eds.), Affect and cognition in criminal decision making (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
14.
ClarkeR. V. (2018). Regulating crime: The birth of the idea, its nurture and the implications for contemporary criminology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 679(1), 20–35.
15.
ClarkeR. V. G. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.
16.
ClarkeR. V. G. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Criminal Justice Press.
17.
ClarkeR. V. G. (2000). Situational prevention, criminology, and social values. In von HirschA.GarlandD.WakefieldA. (Eds.), Ethical and social perspectives on situational crime prevention (pp. 97–112). Hart Publishing.
18.
ClarkeR. V. G. (2012). Opportunity makes the thief. Really? And so what?Crime Science, 1, 3.
19.
ClarkeR. V. G.CornishD. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 6, pp. 147–185). University of Chicago Press.
20.
ClarkeR. V. G.HomelR. (1997). A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques. In LabS. P. (Ed.), Crime prevention at a crossroads (pp. 17–30). Anderson Publishing.
21.
ClarkeR. V.MayhewP. (1988). The British gas suicide story and its criminological implications. Crime and Justice, 10, 79–116.
22.
ClarkeR. V.NewmanG. R. (2006). Outsmarting the terrorists. Praeger Security International.
23.
ClowardR.OhlinL. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. Free Press.
24.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
25.
CornishD. (1993). Theories of action in criminology: Learning theory and rational choices approaches. In ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 5, pp. 351–382). Transaction Press.
26.
CornishD. (1994). The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 3, 151–196.
27.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. G. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer-Verlag.
28.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (1989). Crime specialisation, crime displacement and rational choice theory. In WegenerH.LöselF.HaischJ. (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system. Research in criminology (pp. 103–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_7
29.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. G. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators, and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 41–96.
30.
CornishD.ClarkeR. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933–948.
31.
CullenF. (2011). Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our future—The American Society of Criminology Sutherland 2010 address. Criminology, 49(2), 287–330.
32.
EckJ. (1993). The threat of crime displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 253, 527–546.
33.
EckJ.MadensenT. (2018). Place management, guardianship and the establishment of order. In NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (Eds.), Deterrence, choice and crime: Contemporary perspectives. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 23, p. 107). Routledge.
34.
EkblomP. (1994). Proximal circumstances: A mechanism-based classification of crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 185–232.
35.
EkblomP. (2008). Designing products against crime. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 195–220). Willan Publishing.
36.
EkblomP.TilleyN. (2000). Going equipped: Criminology, situational crime prevention and the resourceful offender. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 376–398.
37.
ElffersH.ReynaldD. M. (2017). Another look at person-situation interaction. What offenders are sensitive to situational crime prevention measures? In ReynaldD. M.LeclercB. (Eds.), The future of rational choice for crime prevention (pp. 87–111). Routledge.
38.
FarrellG.PeaseK. (1993). Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Unit Series, Paper 46. Police Research Group. Home Office.
39.
FawcettE. (2020). Conservatism: The fight for a tradition. Princeton University Press.
40.
FelsonM. (1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 119–128). Springer-Verlag.
41.
FelsonM. (1997). Reconciling Hirschi’s 1969 control theory with the general theory of crime. In LabS. (Ed.), Crime prevention at a crossroads (pp. 31–40). Anderson Publishing Co.
42.
FelsonM. (2003). The process of co-offending. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 149–168.
43.
FelsonM. (2008). Routine activity approach. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 70–77). Willan Publishing.
44.
FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.). (1993). Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5). Transaction Press.
45.
FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (1997). The ethics of situational crime prevention. In NewmanG. R.ClarkeR. V.ShohamS. G. (Eds.), Rational choice and situational crime prevention (pp. 197–218). Ashgate Press.
46.
FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police Research Series, Paper No 98, WebbB. (Ed.)). Home Office.
47.
FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (2010). Routine precautions, criminology and crime prevention. In BarlowH.DeckerS. (Eds.), Crime and public policy: Putting theory to work (2nd ed., pp. 106–20). Temple University Press.
48.
FreilichJ. D. (2015). Beccaria and situational crime prevention. Criminal Justice Review, 40(2), 131–150.
49.
FreilichJ. D.ChermakS. M. (2009). Preventing deadly encounters between law enforcement and American far-rightists. Crime Prevention Studies, 25, 141–172.
50.
FreilichJ. D.GruenewaldJ.MandalaM. (2019). Situational crime prevention and terrorism: An assessment of 10 years of research. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(9), 1283–1311.
51.
FreilichJ. D.NewmanG. R. (2014). Providing opportunities: A sixth column for the techniques of situational crime prevention. In CaneppeleS.CalderoniF. (Eds.), Organized crime, corruption, and crime prevention: Essays in honor of Ernesto Savona (pp. 33–42). Springer.
52.
FreilichJ. D.NewmanG. R. (2015). Transforming piecemeal social engineering into “grand” crime prevention policy: Toward a new criminology of social control. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(1), 203–232.
53.
FreilichJ. D.NewmanG. R. (2017). Situational crime prevention. In PontellH. (Ed.), Oxford research Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.3. Online)
54.
FreilichJ. D.NewmanG. R. (2018). Regulating crime: The new criminology of crime control: An overview. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 679, 8–18.
55.
GaborT. (1990). Crime displacement and situational prevention: Toward the development of some principles. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 41–74.
56.
GarlandD. (2002). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.
57.
GarlandD. (2000). Ideas, institutions and SCP. In von HirschA.GarlandD.WakefieldA. (Eds.), Ethical and social perspectives on situational crime prevention (pp. 1–16). Hart Publishing.
58.
GillM. (2005). Reducing the capacity to offend: Restricting resources for offending. In TilleyN. (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 306–328). Willan.
59.
GottfredsonM. (2013). A note on the role of basic theory in thinking about crime prevention. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 19, 91–97.
60.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
61.
GraboskyP. N. (1996). Unintended consequences of crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 5, 25–56.
62.
Greene-ColozziE. A.FreilichJ. D. (2024). Situational Crime Prevention as a harm mitigation policy for active shooter incidents. Paper under second review (RR).
63.
GroffE. R. (2015). Informal social control and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 90–106.
64.
GueretteR. T. (2007). Migrant death: Border safety and situational crime prevention on the U.S. Mexico divide. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
65.
GueretteR. T.BowersK. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47, 1331–1368.
66.
HalpernD. (1995). Mental health and the built environment. Taylor and Francis.
67.
HaywardK. (2007). Situational crime prevention and its discontents: Rational choice theory versus the “culture of now.”Social Policy & Administration, 41, 232–250.
HesselingR. (1994). Displacement: A review of the empirical literature. Crime Prevention Studies, 3, 197–230.
70.
HirschiT. (1986). On the compatibility of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 105–118). Springer-Verlag.
71.
HirschiT. (1989). Exploring alternatives to integrated theory. In LiskaA. E.KrohnM. D.MessnerS. F. (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 37–49). SUNY Press.
72.
HoH.KoR.MazerolleL. (2022). Situational Crime Prevention (SCP) techniques to prevent and control cybercrimes: A focused systematic review. Computers & Security, 115, 102611.
73.
KleinigJ. (2000). The burdens of Situational Crime Prevention: An ethical commentary. In von HirschA.GarlandD.WakefieldA. (Eds.), Ethical and social perspectives on situational crime prevention (pp. 37–58). Hart Publishing.
74.
KlofasJ. (2010). Teaching the new criminal justice. In KlofasJ.HippleN. K.McGarrellE. (Eds.), The new criminal justice (pp. 147–155). Routledge.
75.
KnepperP. (2009). How situational crime prevention contributes to social welfare. Liverpool law Review, 30, 57–75.
76.
LaycockG. (2005). Deciding what to do: Adopting a problem-oriented approach. In TilleyN. (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 674–698). Willan.
77.
LeclercB.ReynaldD. M. (2017). What could be the future of rational choice for crime prevention? In ReynaldD. M.LeclercB. (Eds.), The future of rational choice for crime prevention (pp. 1–7). Routledge.
78.
LillyJ. R.CullenF. T.BallR. A. (2019). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Sage Publications.
79.
LowensteinG.NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1997). The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 443–473.
80.
MarongiuP.ClarkeR. V. (1993). Ransom kidnapping in Sardinia, subcultural theory and rational choice. In ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5, pp. 179–200). Transaction Press.
81.
MarongiuP.NewmanG. R. (1997). Situational crime prevention and the Utilitarian tradition. In NewmanG.ClarkeR. V.ShohamS. G. (Eds.), Rational choice and situational crime prevention (pp. 115–135). Ashgate Publishing.
82.
MatzaD. (1964). Delinquency and drift. Wiley.
83.
MayhewP.ClarkeR. V.HoughM.SturmanA. (1976). Crime as opportunity. Home Office Research Study No. 34. HMSO.
84.
McCordJ. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16–30.
85.
MertonR. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
86.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
87.
NewmanG. R. (1997). Introduction: Toward a theory of situational crime prevention. In NewmanG.ClarkeR. V.ShohamS. G. (Eds.), Rational choice and situational crime prevention (pp. 1–23). Ashgate Publishing.
88.
NewmanG. R.ClarkeR. V. (2013). Superhighway robbery: Preventing e-commerce crime. Willan.
89.
NewmanG. R.FreilichJ. D. (2012). Extending the reach of Situational Crime Prevention. In FarrellG.TilleyN. (Eds.), The reasoning criminologist: Essays in honor of Ronald V. Clarke (pp. 212–225). Routledge.
90.
PeaseK.FarrellG. (2014). What have criminologists done for us lately? In GillM. (Ed.), The handbook of security (pp. 65–88). Palgrave Macmillan.
91.
PetrossianG. A. (2019). The last fish swimming: The global crime of illegal fishing. Global Crime and Justice Series. ABC-CLIO, LLC. Praeger Imprint.
92.
PetrossianG. A.van UhmD. (2023). Introduction to empirical approaches to wildlife crime prevention. Frontiers in Conservation Sciences, 4, Article 1215912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1215912
93.
ReppettoT. A. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime & Delinquency, 22(2), 166–177.
94.
RiceK. J.SmithW. R. (2002). Socioecological models of automotive theft: Integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 304–336.
95.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
96.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2016). Turning points and the future of life course criminology: Reflections on the 1986 criminal careers report. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(3), 321–335.
97.
ScottM.EckJ.KnutssonJ.GoldsteinH. (2008). Problem oriented policing and environmental criminology. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 221–246). Willan Publishing.
98.
ShaneJ. M.PizaE.MandalaM. (2015). Situational crime prevention and worldwide piracy: A cross-continent analysis. Crime Science, 4(21), 1–13.
99.
ShearingC. (1999). Remarks of Professor Clifford shearing. Criminal Law Bulletin, 35(4), 378–383.
100.
SiegelL. (2022). Criminology: The core. Thomson Wadsworth.
101.
SmithM. J. (1998). Regulating opportunities: Multiple roles for civil remedies in situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 9, 67–88.
102.
SmithM. J.ClarkeR. V. G.PeaseK. (2002). Anticipatory benefits in crime reduction. Crime Prevention Studies, 13, 71–88.
103.
SnipesJ. B.BernardT. J.GerouldA. L. (2019). Vold’s theoretical criminology. Oxford University Press.
104.
TaylorI.WaltonP.YoungJ. (1973). The new criminology: For a social theory of deviance. Routledge.
105.
TaylorM. (1993). Rational choice, behavior analysis and political violence. In FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5, pp. 159–177). Transaction Press.
106.
TillyerM. S. (2015). General multilevel opportunity and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 107–121.
107.
TraslerG. (1993). Conscience, opportunity, rational choice and crime. In FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5, pp. 305–322). Transaction Press.
Van GelderJ. L. (2017). Hot criminology or what Homer’s Odyssea can teach criminologists about decision-making. In ReynaldD. M.LeclercB. (Eds.), The future of rational choice for crime prevention (pp. 30–49). Routledge.
110.
VitoG. F.MaahsJ. R. (2021). Criminology: Theory, research and policy. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
111.
WeisburdD.GroffE. R.YangS. M. (2014). The importance of both opportunity and social disorganization theory in a future research agenda to advance criminological theory and crime prevention at places. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 499–508.
112.
WeisburdD.WycoffL. A.ReadyJ.EckJ. E.HinkleJ. C. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.
113.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (2010). Effective programmes to prevent delinquency. In AdlerJ. R.GrayJ. M. (Eds.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates and practice (2nd ed., pp. 378–403). Willan.
114.
WilcoxP.CullenF. T. (2018). Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 123–148.
115.
WilcoxP.GialopsosB. M. (2015). Crime-event criminology: An overview. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 4–11.
116.
WilcoxP.LandK. C. (2015). Social disorganization and criminal opportunity. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP.SampsonR. J.DooleyB. D. (Eds.), Challenging criminological theory: The legacy of Ruth Rossner Kornhauser. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 19, pp. 237–257). Transaction Publishers.
117.
WolfgangM. E.FerracutiF. (1967). Subculture of violence: Toward an integrated theory of criminology. Associated Book Publishers Limited.
118.
WortleyR. K. (1996). Guilt, shame and situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 5, 115–132.
119.
WortleyR. K. (2002). Situational prison control: Crime prevention in correctional institutions. Cambridge University Press.
120.
WortleyR. K.TilleyN. (2017). Does situational crime prevention require a rational offender? In ReynaldD. M.LeclercB. (Eds.), The future of rational choice for crime prevention (pp. 8–29). Routledge.
121.
WortleyR. K.TownsleyM. (2016). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In WortleyR.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–26). Routledge.
122.
YoungJ. (2003). Searching for a new criminology of everyday life: Book review article of Garland, D. 2002. The culture of control. British Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 228–242.
