Adolescents tend to increase their offending after police contact, contrary to predictions of choice-based theories. This may be due to police contact altering their view of their future prospects, leading them to prioritize the present. Preregistered fixed effects analyses of longitudinal data collected from Zurich public school students provide no support for an association between police contact and a change in impulsivity, sensation-seeking, or future orientation. Exploratory analyses find evidence that first-time and especially early contact with the police is associated with an increase in sensation-seeking and a reduction in future orientation. We conclude that certain types of police contact may increase young adolescents’ preference for the present. Future research should test whether this relationship is causal and generalizable.
AgnewR.ScheuermanH.GrosholzJ.IsomD.WatsonL.ThaxtonS. (2011). Does victimization reduce self-control? A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 169–174.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage.
3.
AndersonA. Y.WeissD. B.OselinS. S. (2020). When I grow up: Exploring the link between future expectations and criminal trajectories. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6, 43–66.
4.
AnwarS.LoughranT. A. (2011). Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 49(3), 667–698.
5.
BeccariaC. (1764[1985]). On crimes and punishments (PaolucciH., trans.) Macmillan. (Originally published 1764).
6.
BeckerG. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.
7.
BeckerH. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
8.
BernburgJ. G. (2019). Labeling theory. In KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.HallG. P. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 179–196). Springer.
9.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology41(4), 1287–1318.
10.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D.RiveraC. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88.
11.
BernheimB. D.RayD.YeltekinŞ. (2015). Poverty and self-control. Econometrica, 83(5), 1877–1911.
12.
BersaniB. E.JacobsenW. C.DohertyE. E. (2022). Does early adolescent arrest alter the developmental course of offending into young adulthood?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(4), 724–745.
13.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BurgessJ.CorbettaM.CrawfordK.DufloE.FogartyL.GopnikA.HanafiS.HerreroM.HongY. Y.KameyamaY.LeeT. M. C.LeungG. M.NaginD. S.NobreA. C.NordentoftM.OkbayA.PerforsA.RivalL. M.. . . WagnerC. (2022). The future of human behaviour research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 15–24.
14.
BrayneS. (2014). Surveillance and system avoidance: Criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 367–391.
15.
BrezinaT.TekinE.TopalliV. (2009). “Might not be a tomorrow”: A multimethods approach to anticipated early death and youth crime. Criminology, 47(4), 1091–1129.
16.
BurtC. H. (2020). Self-control and crime: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 43–73.
17.
BurtC. H.SweetenG.SimonsR. L. (2014). Self-control through emerging adulthood: Instability, multidimensionality, and criminological significance. Criminology, 52(3), 450–487.
18.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A.JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253.
19.
CaldwellR. M.WiebeR. P.ClevelandH. H. (2006). The influence of future certainty and contextual factors on delinquent behavior and school adjustment among African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(4), 587–598.
20.
ChiricosT.BarrickK.BalesW.BontragerS. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45(3), 547–581.
21.
ClarkeR. V.CornishD. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6, pp. 147–185). University of Chicago Press.
DalyM.WilsonM. (2005). Carpe diem: Adaptation and devaluing the future. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(1), 55–60.
24.
DavisJ. P.DumasT. M.BereyB. L.MerrinG. J.CimpianJ. R.RobertsB. W. (2017). Effect of victimization on impulse control and binge drinking among serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1515–1532.
25.
Del ToroJ.LloydT.BuchananK. S.RobinsS. J.BencharitL. Z.SmiedtM. G.ReddyK. S.PougetE. R.KerrisonE. M.GoffP. A. (2019). The criminogenic and psychological effects of police stops on adolescent black and Latino boys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(17), 8261–8268.
26.
FrankenhuisW. E.NettleD. (2018). Open science is liberating and can foster creativity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 439–447.
27.
FrankenhuisW. E.NettleD. (2020). The strengths of people in poverty. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 16–21.
28.
FrankenhuisW. E.PanchanathanK.NettleD. (2016). Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7(1), 76–80.
29.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635.
30.
GeX.DonnellanM. B.WenkE. (2003). Differences in personality and patterns of recidivism between early starters and other serious male offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 31(1), 68–77.
31.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990[2022]). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
32.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.
33.
GrinshteynE.HemenwayD. (2019). Violent death rates in the US compared to those of the other high-income countries, 2015. Preventive Medicine, 123, 20–26.
34.
HaushoferJ.FehrE. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862–867.
35.
HayC. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707–736.
36.
HellerS. B.ShahA. K.GuryanJ.LudwigJ.MullainathanS.PollackH. A. (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Some field experiments to reduce crime and dropout in Chicago. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(1), 1–54.
37.
HipwellA. E.BeeneyJ.YeF.GebreselassieS. H.StalterM. R.GaneshD.KeenanK.SteppS. D. (2018). Police contacts, arrests and decreasing self-control and personal responsibility among female adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(12), 1252–1260.
38.
HoebenE. M.ThomasK. J. (2019). Peers and offender decision-making. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(4), 759–784.
39.
IselinA. M. R.MulveyE. P.LoughranT. A.ChungH. L.SchubertC. A. (2012). A longitudinal examination of serious adolescent offenders’ perceptions of chances for success and engagement in behaviors accomplishing goals. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(2), 237–249.
40.
JacobsenW. C.RaganD. T.YangM.NadelE. L.FeinbergM. E. (2022). Arrested friendships? Justice involvement and interpersonal exclusion among rural youth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(3), 365–409.
41.
JanssenH. J.BruinsmaG. J.DekovićM.EichelsheimV. I. (2018). A between-and within-person analysis of parenting and time spent in criminogenic settings during adolescence: The role of self-control and delinquent attitudes. Youth & Society, 50(2), 229–254.
42.
JanssenH. J.EichelsheimV. I.DekovićM.BruinsmaG. J. (2016). How is parenting related to adolescent delinquency? A between-and within-person analysis of the mediating role of self-control, delinquent attitudes, peer delinquency, and time spent in criminogenic settings. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 169–194.
43.
JaynesC. M.MouleR. K.HubbellJ. T.SantosM. R. (2021). Impulsivity or discounting? Evaluating the influence of individual differences in temporal orientation on offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38, 831–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09518-5
44.
KirkD. S.SampsonR. J. (2013). Juvenile arrest and collateral educational damage in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 36–62.
45.
KübelS.DeitzerJ. R.FrankenhuisW. E.RibeaudD.EisnerMvan GelderJ. L. (2023). The shortsighted victim: Short-term mindsets mediate the link between victimization and later offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 86, 102062.
46.
KübelS.DeitzerJ.FrankenhuisW. E.RibeaudD.EisnerMvan GelderJ. L. (2024). Beyond the situation: Hanging out with peers now is associated with short-term mindsets later. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 10, 51–72.
47.
LemertE. (1951[1961]). Social pathology. McGraw-Hill
48.
LibermanA. M.KirkD. S.KimK. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52(3), 345–370.
49.
LopesG.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SchmidtN. M.VasquezB. E.BernburgJ. G. (2012). Labeling and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of formal police intervention on life chances and crime during emerging adulthood. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 456–488.
50.
MahlerA.FineA.FrickP. J.SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (2018). Expecting the unexpected? Expectations for future success among adolescent first-time offenders. Child Development, 89(6), e535–e551.
51.
MamayekC.PaternosterR.LoughranT. A. (2017). Temporal discounting, present orientation, and criminal deterrence. In BernascoW.ElffersH.van GelderJ. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of offender decision making (pp. 209–227). Oxford University Press.
52.
McGloinJ. M.ThomasK. J. (2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 241–264.
53.
MeldrumR. C.HayC. (2012). Do peers matter in the development of self-control? Evidence from a longitudinal study of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(6), 691–703.
54.
MeldrumR. C.YoungJ. T.WeermanF. M. (2012). Changes in self-control during adolescence: Investigating the influence of the adolescent peer network. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(6), 452–462.
55.
MonahanK. C.KingK. M.ShulmanE. P.CauffmanE.ChassinL. (2015). The effects of violence exposure on the development of impulse control and future orientation across adolescence and early adulthood: Time-specific and generalized effects in a sample of juvenile offenders. Development and Psychopathology, 27(4), 1267–1283.
56.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 27, 467–496.
57.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32(4), 581–606.
58.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39(4), 865–892.
59.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2004). Time and punishment: Delayed consequences and criminal behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 295–317.
60.
NivetteA.BechtigerL.RibeaudD.ShanahanL.EisnerM. (2024). Assessing the Effect of First-time Police Contact on Internalizing Problems Among Youth in Zurich, Switzerland: A Quasi-experimental Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-01986-9
61.
NosekB. A.EbersoleC. R.DeHavenA. C.MellorD. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115(11), 2600–2606.
62.
O’BrienL.AlbertD.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(4), 747–753.
63.
PaternosterR.IovanniL. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 359–394.
64.
PepperG. V.NettleD. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 45–66.
65.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.
66.
RaganD. T.OsgoodD. W.RamirezN. G.MoodyJ.GestS. D. (2022). A comparison of peer influence estimates from SIENA stochastic actor–based models and from conventional regression approaches. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(1): 357–395.
RestivoE.LanierM. M. (2015). Measuring the contextual effects and mitigating factors of labeling theory. Justice Quarterly, 32, 116–141.
69.
RibeaudD.MurrayA.ShanahanL.ShanahanM.EisnerM. (2022). Cohort profile: The Zurich project on the social development from childhood to adulthood (z-proso). Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology8, 151–171.
70.
RowanZ. R.FineA.SteinbergL.FrickP. J.CauffmanE. (2023). Labeling effects of initial juvenile justice system processing decision on youth interpersonal ties. Criminology, 61(4), 731–757.
71.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.
72.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency, 7, 133–161.
SchmidtN. M.LopesG.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J. (2015). Getting caught and getting hitched: An assessment of the relationship between police intervention, life chances, and romantic unions. Justice Quarterly, 32(6), 976–1005.
75.
SchurE. M. (1980). The politics of deviance: Stigma contests and the uses of power. Prentice Hall.
76.
SheltonK. K.FrickP. J.WoottonJ. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(3), 317–329.
77.
StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.
78.
SteinbergL.AlbertD.CauffmanE.BanichM.GrahamS.WoolardJ. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778.
79.
SteinbergL.GrahamS.O’BrienL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.BanichM. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44.
80.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543.
TannenbaumF. (1938). Crime and the Community. Ginn.
83.
TestaA.TurneyK.JacksonD. B.JaynesC. M. (2022). Police contact and future orientation from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from the Pathways to Desistance Study. Criminology, 60(2), 263–290.
84.
ThomasK. J.BaumerE. P.LoughranT. A. (2022). Structural predictors of choice: Testing a multilevel rational choice theory of crime. Criminology, 60, 606–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12314
85.
ThomasK. J.O’NeillJ.LoughranT. A. (2023). Estimating latent preferences for crime: Implications for rational choice, identity, and desistance theories. Justice Quarterly, 40, 613–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2051586
86.
ThomasK. J.VogelM. (2019). Testing a rational choice model of “desistance:” Decomposing changing expectations and changing utilities. Criminology, 57(4), 687-714.
87.
TonryM. (2023). Why Americans are a people of exceptional violence. Crime and Justice, 52(1): 233–264.
88.
TravisJ.WesternB.RedburnF. S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences (National Research Council Report). National Research Council.
89.
TriplettR.UptonL. (2015). Labeling theory: Past, present, and future. In PiqueroA. R. (Ed.), Handbook of criminological theory (pp. 271–289). John Wiley & Sons.
90.
TurneyK.TestaA.JacksonD. B. (2022). Police stops and the erosion of positive future orientation among urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.02.015
91.
VaiseyS.MilesA. (2017). What you can—and can’t—do with three-wave panel data. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(1), 44–67.
92.
van GelderJ.-L.AverdijkM.RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2018). Punitive parenting and delinquency: The mediating role of short-term mindsets. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(3), 644–666.
93.
van GelderJ. L.AverdijkM.RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2020). Sanctions, short-term mindsets, and delinquency: Reverse causality in a sample of high school youth. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25(2), 199–218.
94.
van GelderJ. L.CornetL. J.ZwaluaN. P.MertensE. C.van der SchalkJ. (2022). Interaction with the future self in virtual reality reduces self-defeating behavior in a sample of convicted offenders. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–9.
95.
van GelderJ.-L.HershfieldH. E.NordgrenL. F. (2013). Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science, 24(6), 974–980.
96.
van GelderJ.-L.LucianoE. C.KranenbargM. W.HershfieldH. E. (2015). Friends with my future self: Longitudinal vividness intervention reduces delinquency. Criminology, 53(2), 158–179.
97.
van’t VeerA. E.Giner-SorollaR. (2016). Pre-registration in social psychology: A discussion and suggested template. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 2–12.
98.
WaltersG. D. (2016). Crime continuity and psychological inertia: Testing the cognitive mediation and additive postulates with male adjudicated delinquents. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 237–252.
99.
WardJ. T.KrohnM. D.GibsonC. L. (2013). The effects of police contact on trajectories of violence: A group-based, propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 440–475.
100.
WellfordC.TriplettR. (1993). The future of labeling theory: Foundations and promises. In AdlerF.LauferW.S. (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–22). Transaction.
101.
WetzelsP.EnzmannD.MecklenburgE.PfeifferC. (2001). Jugend und Gewalt: Eine repräsentative Dunkelfeldanalyse in München und acht anderen deutschen Städten [Youth and violence. A representative dark number study in Munich and eight other German cities]. Nomos.
102.
WileyS. A. (2015). Arrested development: Does the grade level at which juveniles experience arrest matter?Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(4), 411–433.
103.
WileyS. A.EsbensenF. A. (2016). The effect of police contact: Does official intervention result in deviance amplification?Crime & Delinquency, 62(3), 283–307.
104.
WileyS. A.SlocumL. A.EsbensenF. A. (2013). The unintended consequences of being stopped or arrested: An exploration of the labeling mechanisms through which police contact leads to subsequent delinquency. Criminology, 51(4), 927–966.
105.
WilsonT.PaternosterR.LoughranT. (2017). Direct and indirect experiential effects in an updating model of deterrence: A research note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 63–77.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
