When Violence Is Not an Option: Perceived Choice Sets and Differential Deterrability Among Adolescents in Germany

Abstract

The idea that individuals differ in their perceived choice sets or repertoires has a long tradition in criminology and is a common ingredient of modern choice theories. We test this assumption in a large-scale school survey of seventh graders in Germany. Eliciting perceived action alternatives in a provocation scenario, we examine the frequency of purely non-violent, purely violent, and mixed repertoires. Our results confirm that a large share of adolescents does not perceive of violence as an option. In contrast, relatively few adolescents could only imagine to react with physical or verbal violence to a physical provocation. We also examine whether self-control and the perceived certainty and severity of sanctions are differentially associated with violent offending across types of repertoires.

Keywords

offender decision making repertoires provocation youth violence situational action theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

Peters

A. A. R.

(1986). The techniques of neutralization: An analysis of predisposing and situational factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854886013001005

Barnum

T. C.

Nagin

D. S.

Pogarsky

(2021). Sanction risk perceptions, coherence, and deterrence. Criminology, 59(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12266.

Bouhana

(2013). The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: Conceptual challenges for crime science. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00682

Brauer

J. R.

Tittle

C. R.

(2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226937.

Bruch

Feinberg

(2017). Decision-making processes in social contexts. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Cornish

D. B.

Clarke

R. V.

(2014). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Transaction Publishers.

Cressey

D. R.

(1954). Differential association theory and compulsive crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 45, 29–40.

Esser

Kroneberg

(2015). An integrative theory of action: The model of frame selection. In Lawler

E. J.

Yoon

Thye

S. R.

(Eds.), Order on the edge of chaos: Social psychology and the problem of social order (pp. 63–85) Cambridge University Press.

10.

Etzioni

(1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. The Free Press.

11.

Grasmick

H. G.

Tittle

C. R.

Bursik

R. J.

Jr. Arneklev

B. J.

(1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002

12.

Herman

Pogarsky

(2022). Morality, deterrability, and offender decision making. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1709884

13.

Hirtenlehner

Bacher

Leitgöb

Schartmueller

(2022). Do morality and self-control protect from criminogenic peer influence? Testing multidimensional person–environment interactions. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 78–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1903069

14.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

15.

Kammigan

(2023). Reflecting on the interaction of self-control and morality in situational action theory: Comparing absolute and relative effects of self-control in 28 countries. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 39(2), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-022-09541-0

16.

Kroneberg

Ernst

Gerth

(2016). “Das Projekt” Freundschaft und Gewalt im Jugendalter. In Neubacher

Bögelein

(Eds.), Krise-Kriminalität-Kriminologie (pp. 353–364). Forum Verlag Godesberg.

17.

Kroneberg

Heintze

Mehlkop

(2010). The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology, 48(1), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x

18.

Kroneberg

Kalter

(2012). Rational choice theory and empirical research: Methodological and theoretical contributions in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145441

19.

Kroneberg

Schulz

(2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189

20.

Matsueda

R. L.

(1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime & Delinquency, 34(3), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128788034003005

21.

Matsueda

R. L.

(2017). Toward an analytical criminology: The micro–macro problem, causal mechanisms, and public policy. Criminology, 55(3), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12149

22.

Matza

(1964). Delinquency and drift. John Wiley and Sons.

23.

McCarthy

(2002). New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140752

24.

Messner

S. F.

(2012). Morality, markets, and the Asc: 2011 presidential address to the American society of criminology. Criminology, 50(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00264.x

25.

Minor

W. W.

(1980). The neutralization of criminal offense. Criminology, 18(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1980.tb01351.x

26.

Minor

W. W.

(1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788101800206

27.

Nagin

D. S.

(2007). Moving choice to center stage in criminological research and theory: The American society of criminology 2006 Sutherland address. Criminology, 45(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00078.x

28.

Oberwittler

Gerstner

(2014). Die Modellierung von Interaktionseffekten in Erklärungsmodellen selbstberichteter Delinquenz – Ein empirischer Vergleich von linearer OLS-Regression und negativer Binomialregression anhand der Wechselwirkungen von Risikoorientierung und Scham. In Eifler

Pollich

(Eds.), Empirische Forschung über Kriminalität (pp. 275–301). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

29.

Osgood

D. W.

Finken

L. L.

McMorris

B. J.

(2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021198509929

30.

Paternoster

Pogarsky

(2009). Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9065-y

31.

Paternoster

Pogarsky

Zimmerman

(2011). Thoughtfully reflective decision making and the accumulation of capital: Bringing choice back in. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5

32.

Paternoster

Simpson

(1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 30(3), 549. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054128

33.

Pauwels

L. J. R.

Svensson

(2017). How robust is the moderating effect of extremist beliefs on the relationship between self-control and violent extremism? Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1000–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687757

34.

Pauwels

L. J. R.

Svensson

Hirtenlehner

(2018). Testing situational action theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732185

35.

Pickett

J. T.

Barnes

J. C.

Wilson

Roche

S. P.

(2020). Prospect theory and criminal choice: Experiments testing framing, reference dependence, and decision weights. Justice Quarterly, 37(6), 1140–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1531142

36.

Piquero

A. R.

Paternoster

Pogarsky

Loughran

(2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7(1), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404

37.

Pogarsky

(2002). Identifying ‘deterrable’ offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095301

38.

Rohrer

J. M.

Arslan

R. C.

(2021). Precise answers to vague questions: Issues with interactions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 251524592110073. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007368

39.

Stock

J. H.

Watson

M. W.

(2018). Introduction to econometrics (Updated 3rd ed.). Pearson.

40.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.

41.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1988). The professional thief. University of Chicago Press.

42.

Thomas

K. J.

(2018). Revisiting delinquent attitudes: Measurement, dimensionality and behavioral effects. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9336-3

43.

Thomas

K. J.

(2019). Rationalizing delinquency: Understanding the person-situation interaction through item response theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818789752

44.

Thomas

K. J.

McGloin

J. M.

(2013). A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51(2), 435–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12010

45.

Thomas

Znaniecki

(1927). The polish peasant in Europe and America. Alfred A. Knopf.

46.

Van Gelder

J.-L

. (2013). Beyond rational choice: The hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(9), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153

47.

van Gelder

J.-L.

De Vries

R. E

. (2012). Traits and states: Integrating personality and affect into a model of criminal decision making. Criminology, 50(3), 637–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.x

48.

van Gelder

J.-L.

De Vries

R. E

. (2013). Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8

49.

Weisburd

Wilson

D. B.

Wooditch

Britt

(2022). Count-based regression models. In Weisburd

Wilson

D. B.

Wooditch

Britt

(Eds.), Advanced statistics in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 233–271). Springer International Publishing.

50.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

(2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In Wikström

P.-O. H.

Sampson

R. J.

(Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development, pathways in crime (pp. 61–107). Cambridge University Press.

51.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Kroneberg

(2022). Analytic criminology: Mechanisms and methods in the explanation of crime and its causes. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-091320

52.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Oberwittler

Treiber

Hardie

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Oberwittler

Treiber

Hardie

(2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press.

53.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Svensson

(2010). When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810372132

54.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Treiber

K. H.

(2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2794

55.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

6.44 MB