The idea that individuals differ in their perceived choice sets or repertoires has a long tradition in criminology and is a common ingredient of modern choice theories. We test this assumption in a large-scale school survey of seventh graders in Germany. Eliciting perceived action alternatives in a provocation scenario, we examine the frequency of purely non-violent, purely violent, and mixed repertoires. Our results confirm that a large share of adolescents does not perceive of violence as an option. In contrast, relatively few adolescents could only imagine to react with physical or verbal violence to a physical provocation. We also examine whether self-control and the perceived certainty and severity of sanctions are differentially associated with violent offending across types of repertoires.
AgnewR.PetersA. A. R. (1986). The techniques of neutralization: An analysis of predisposing and situational factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854886013001005
BouhanaN. (2013). The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: Conceptual challenges for crime science. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00682
4.
BrauerJ. R.TittleC. R. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226937.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
7.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2014). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Transaction Publishers.
8.
CresseyD. R. (1954). Differential association theory and compulsive crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 45, 29–40.
9.
EsserH.KronebergC. (2015). An integrative theory of action: The model of frame selection. In LawlerE. J.YoonJ.ThyeS. R. (Eds.), Order on the edge of chaos: Social psychology and the problem of social order (pp. 63–85) Cambridge University Press.
10.
EtzioniA. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. The Free Press.
11.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
HirtenlehnerH.BacherJ.LeitgöbH.SchartmuellerD. (2022). Do morality and self-control protect from criminogenic peer influence? Testing multidimensional person–environment interactions. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 78–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1903069
14.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15.
KammiganI. (2023). Reflecting on the interaction of self-control and morality in situational action theory: Comparing absolute and relative effects of self-control in 28 countries. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 39(2), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-022-09541-0
16.
KronebergC.ErnstA.GerthM. (2016). “Das Projekt” Freundschaft und Gewalt im Jugendalter. In NeubacherF.BögeleinN. (Eds.), Krise-Kriminalität-Kriminologie (pp. 353–364). Forum Verlag Godesberg.
17.
KronebergC.HeintzeI.MehlkopG. (2010). The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology, 48(1), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x
18.
KronebergC.KalterF. (2012). Rational choice theory and empirical research: Methodological and theoretical contributions in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145441
19.
KronebergC.SchulzS. (2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189
MatsuedaR. L. (2017). Toward an analytical criminology: The micro–macro problem, causal mechanisms, and public policy. Criminology, 55(3), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12149
22.
MatzaD. (1964). Delinquency and drift. John Wiley and Sons.
MessnerS. F. (2012). Morality, markets, and the Asc: 2011 presidential address to the American society of criminology. Criminology, 50(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00264.x
MinorW. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788101800206
27.
NaginD. S. (2007). Moving choice to center stage in criminological research and theory: The American society of criminology 2006 Sutherland address. Criminology, 45(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00078.x
28.
OberwittlerD.GerstnerD. (2014). Die Modellierung von Interaktionseffekten in Erklärungsmodellen selbstberichteter Delinquenz – Ein empirischer Vergleich von linearer OLS-Regression und negativer Binomialregression anhand der Wechselwirkungen von Risikoorientierung und Scham. In EiflerS.PollichD. (Eds.), Empirische Forschung über Kriminalität (pp. 275–301). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
29.
OsgoodD. W.FinkenL. L.McMorrisB. J. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021198509929
30.
PaternosterR.PogarskyG. (2009). Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9065-y
31.
PaternosterR.PogarskyG.ZimmermanG. (2011). Thoughtfully reflective decision making and the accumulation of capital: Bringing choice back in. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5
32.
PaternosterR.SimpsonS. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 30(3), 549. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054128
33.
PauwelsL. J. R.SvenssonR. (2017). How robust is the moderating effect of extremist beliefs on the relationship between self-control and violent extremism?Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1000–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687757
34.
PauwelsL. J. R.SvenssonR.HirtenlehnerH. (2018). Testing situational action theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732185
35.
PickettJ. T.BarnesJ. C.WilsonT.RocheS. P. (2020). Prospect theory and criminal choice: Experiments testing framing, reference dependence, and decision weights. Justice Quarterly, 37(6), 1140–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1531142
36.
PiqueroA. R.PaternosterRPogarskyG.LoughranT. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7(1), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404
37.
PogarskyG. (2002). Identifying ‘deterrable’ offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095301
38.
RohrerJ. M.ArslanR. C. (2021). Precise answers to vague questions: Issues with interactions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 251524592110073. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007368
39.
StockJ. H.WatsonM. W. (2018). Introduction to econometrics (Updated 3rd ed.). Pearson.
40.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.
41.
SutherlandE. H. (1988). The professional thief. University of Chicago Press.
42.
ThomasK. J. (2018). Revisiting delinquent attitudes: Measurement, dimensionality and behavioral effects. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9336-3
43.
ThomasK. J. (2019). Rationalizing delinquency: Understanding the person-situation interaction through item response theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818789752
44.
ThomasK. J.McGloinJ. M. (2013). A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51(2), 435–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12010
45.
ThomasW.ZnanieckiF. (1927). The polish peasant in Europe and America. Alfred A. Knopf.
46.
Van GelderJ.-L. (2013). Beyond rational choice: The hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(9), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153
47.
van GelderJ.-L.De VriesR. E. (2012). Traits and states: Integrating personality and affect into a model of criminal decision making. Criminology, 50(3), 637–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.x
48.
van GelderJ.-L.De VriesR. E. (2013). Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8
49.
WeisburdD.WilsonD. B.WooditchA.BrittC. (2022). Count-based regression models. In WeisburdD.WilsonD. B.WooditchA.BrittC. (Eds.), Advanced statistics in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 233–271). Springer International Publishing.
50.
WikströmP.-O. H. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In WikströmP.-O. H.SampsonR. J. (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development, pathways in crime (pp. 61–107). Cambridge University Press.
51.
WikströmP.-O. H.KronebergC. (2022). Analytic criminology: Mechanisms and methods in the explanation of crime and its causes. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-091320
52.
WikströmP.-O. H.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB.WikströmP.-O. H.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press.
53.
WikströmP.-O. H.SvenssonR. (2010). When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810372132
54.
WikströmP.-O. H.TreiberK. H. (2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2794
55.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
