Using the theoretical framework of General Strain Theory, this study examines how each of Agnew’s categorizations of strain are associated with people in prison’s anger and self-reported charges for misconduct. The strains explored include dehumanization (negative stimuli), loss of social ties (removal of positive stimuli), and unfair pay for labor (unjust outcomes). Surveys of 3,531 men and women incarcerated in five different facilities were examined. Each strain is significantly and positively associated with anger. Anger is significantly and positively associated with misconduct. Dehumanization and loss of social ties are significantly and indirectly associated with misconduct through anger in the theoretically expected direction. In sum, strains may foment anger among people in prison resulting in rule breaking.
AbderhaldenF.BakerT.GordonJ. (2020). Futurelessness, risk perceptions, and commitment to institutional rules among a sample of incarcerated men and women. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64, 591–608.
2.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.
3.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361.
4.
AgnewR. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Roxbury Publishing Company.
5.
AgnewR.WhiteH. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(4), 475–500.
6.
AlwardL.BakerT.GordonJ. (2021). Procedural justice and incarcerated people’s obligation to obey institutional rules: An examination of current, former, and never-gang members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73, 101757.
7.
AutyK. M.CopeA.LieblingA. (2017). Psychoeducational programs for reducing prison violence: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 126–143.
8.
BairA. (2007). Prison labor in the United States: An economic analysis. Routledge.
9.
BakerT. (2018). Shared race/ethnicity with police and male offenders’ self-regulating beliefs: Exploring the salience of instrumental and normative factors for securing obedience. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 1918–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818794228
10.
BakerT.AbderhaldenF.AlwardL.BedardL. (2021). Exploring the association between procedural justice in jails and incarcerated people’s commitment to institutional rules. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 6, 189–202.
11.
BakerT.MitchellM. M.GordonJ. A. (2022). Prison visitation and concerns about reentry: Variations in frequency and quality of visits are associated with reentry concerns among people incarcerated in prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66, 1263–1284.
12.
BakerT.PelfreyW. V.Jr. (2016). Bullying victimization, social network usage, and delinquent coping in a sample of urban youth: Examining the predictions of general strain theory. Violence and Victims, 31(6), 1021–1043.
13.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J.EichelsheimV. I.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 196–218.
14.
BlevinsK. R.Johnson ListwanS.CullenF. T.Lero JonsonC. (2010). A general strain theory of prison violence and misconduct: An integrated model of inmate behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 148–166.
15.
BradyC. M.BakerT.PelfreyW. V.Jr. (2020). Comparing the impact of bullying victimization on drug use and weapon carrying among male and female middle and high school students: A partial test of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 41(12), 1601–1615.
16.
BroidyL. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39(1), 9–36.
17.
CaoL.ZhaoJ.Van DineS. (1997). Prison disciplinary tickets: A test of the deprivation and importation models. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25(2), 103–113.
18.
ClowardR. A.OhlinL. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. Free Press.
19.
CochranJ. C. (2014). Breaches in the wall: Imprisonment, social support, and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(2), 200–229.
20.
CohenA. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Free Press
21.
CreweB. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 455–468.
DelisiM.TruslsonC.MarquartJ.DruryA.KosloskiA. (2011). Inside the prison black box: Toward a life course importation model of inmate behavior. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 1186–1207.
24.
DiIulioJ. (1987). Governing prison: A comparative study of correctional management. The Free Press.
25.
EndersC. K. (2001) The performance of full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 713–740.
26.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.
27.
GendreauP.GogginC. E.LawM. A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(4), 414–431.
28.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums. Random House.
29.
GrewalR.Baumgartner, (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23, 519–529.
30.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
31.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
32.
HepburnJ. R. (1987). The prison control structure and its effects on work attitudes: The perceptions and attitudes of prison guards. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15, 49–64.
33.
IrwinJ.CresseyD. (1962). Thieves, convicts, and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142–155.
34.
JangS. (2020). Prison strains, negative emotions, and deviance among prisoners in South Korea: A latent-variable modeling test of general strain theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(15), 1607–1636.
35.
JiangS.Fisher-GiorlandoM. (2002). Inmate misconduct: A test of the deprivation, importation, and situational models. The Prison Journal, 82, 335–358.
36.
LebanL.CardwellS. M.CopesH.BrezinaT. (2016). Adapting to prison life: A qualitative examination of the coping process among incarcerated offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 943–969.
37.
LieblingA. (2000). Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 333–357.
38.
ListwanS. J.SullivanC. J.AgnewR.CullenF. T.ColvinM. (2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 144–168.
39.
LiuS.PickettJ.BakerT. (2016). Inside the black box: Prison visitation, the costs of offending, and inmate social capital. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27, 766–790.
40.
ManciniC.BakerT.SainjuK. D.GoldenK.BedardL. E.GertzM. (2016). Examining external support received in prison and concerns about reentry among incarcerated women. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 163–190.
41.
MazerolleP.BurtonV. S.Jr.CullenF. T.EvansT. D.PayneG. L. (2000). Strain, anger, and delinquent adaptations specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(2), 89–101.
42.
MertonR. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
43.
MorrisR. G.CarriagaM. L.DiamondB.PiqueroN. L.PiqueroA. R. (2012). Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 194–201.
44.
NoviskyM. A.PeraltaR. L. (2020). Gladiator school: Returning citizens’ experiences with secondary violence exposure in prison. Victims & Offenders, 15, 594–618.
45.
PaternosterR.MazerolleP. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(3), 235–263.
46.
PeckJ. H.ChildsK. K.JenningsW. G.BradyC. M. (2018). General strain theory, depression, and substance use: Results from a nationally representative, longitudinal sample of White, African-American, and Hispanic adolescents and young adults. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 27(1), 11–28.
47.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2000). Generalizing general strain theory: An examination of an offending population. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 449–484.
48.
RobisonM.BakerT.AbderhaldenF. P.GordonJ. A.JoinerT. E. (2024). Development and validation of a self-report measure of perceived dehumanization from officers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 80, 1065–1078
49.
SchenkA. M.FremouwW. J. (2012). Individual characteristics related to prison violence: A critical review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 430–442.
50.
SteinerB.ButlerH. D.EllisonJ. M. (2014). Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 462–470.
51.
SykesG. (1958). The Society of Captives. Princeton Univesity Press.
52.
TascaM.MulveyP.RodriguezN. (2016). Families coming together in prison: An examination of visitation encounters. Punishment & Society, 18(4), 459–478.
53.
TochH. (1992). Living in prison: The ecology of survival. APA Press.
54.
TochH. (1997). Corrections: A humanistic approach. Harrow and Heston.
55.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press.
56.
Van HallM.DirkzwagerA., J., E.van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2024). Procedural justice and legitimacy of the law in the criminal justice system: A longitudinal study among Dutch detainees. Psychology, Crime & Law, 30, 101–124.
57.
WeissR. P. (2001). “Repatriating” low-wage work: The political economy of prison labor reprivatization in the postindustrial United States. Criminology, 39, 253–292.
58.
Wulf-LuddenT. L. (2013). Pseudo-families and institutional misconduct in a women’s prison: A test of General Strain Theory. University of Nebraska at Omaha.
59.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.Jr.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.
60.
ZinkT. M. (1957). Are prison troublemakers different?The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 433–434.
