There is limited research examining predictors of attrition in the Pathways to Desistance study. There is also a paucity of research examining time-varying effects of predictors of attrition. Changes in characteristics across a study period may lead to the emergence of increases/decreases in attrition risk across time. The Pathways to Desistance dataset (11 waves) was analyzed. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to examine effects of time-stable and time-varying predictors of attrition in four domains: sociodemographic, mental health, behavioral, and psychosocial. The proportional hazards assumption was tested to determine if effects of predictors varied. Results indicated that sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors were most relevant for understanding differential attrition. Effects of age, peers, and gender on attrition risk varied across time.
AdalbjarnardottirS.HafsteinssonL. G. (2001). Adolescents’ perceived parenting styles and their substance use: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(4), 401–423.
2.
AsendorpfJ. B.Van De SchootR.DenissenJ. J.HuttemanR. (2014). Reducing bias due to systematic attrition in longitudinal studies: The benefits of multiple imputation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(5), 453–460.
3.
BadawiM. A.EatonW. W.MyllyluomaJ.WeimerL. G.GalloJ. (1999). Psychopathology and attrition in the Baltimore ECA 15-year follow-up 1981–1996. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 91–98.
4.
BarryA. E. (2005). How attrition impacts the internal and external validity of longitudinal research. The Journal of School Health, 75(7), 267.
5.
BeckerK.BerryS. H.OrrN.PerlmanJ. (2014). Finding the hard to reach and keeping them engaged in research. In TourangeauR.EdwardsB.JohnsonT. P.WolterK. M.BatesN. (Eds.), Hard-to-survey populations (pp. 619–641). Cambridge University Press.
6.
BoykinD. M.LondonM. J.OrcuttH. K. (2016). Examining minority attrition among women in longitudinal trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 29(1), 26–32.
7.
BrameR.FaganJ.PiqueroA. R.SchubertC. A.SteinbergL. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 256–272.
8.
BrameR.PiqueroA. R. (2003). Selective attrition and the age-crime relationship. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 107–127.
9.
ButlerJ.III.QuinnS. C.FryerC. S.GarzaM. A.KimK. H.ThomasS. B. (2013). Characterizing researchers by strategies used for retaining minority participants: Results of a national survey. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 36(1), 61–67.
10.
ChangM. W.BrownR.NitzkeS. (2009). Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers. BMC Public Health, 9, 1–11.
11.
ChenY.ShaoZ.ChenW.XieH.WuZ.QinG.ZhaoN. (2017). A varying-coefficient cox model for the effect of CA19-9 kinetics on overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget, 8(18), 29925.
12.
ClarkK. J.MitchellM. M.FahmyC.PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (2020). What if they are all high-risk for attrition? Correlates of retention in a longitudinal study of reentry from prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20967934
13.
ClausR. E.KindlebergerL. R.DuganM. C. (2002). Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 34(1), 69–74.
14.
CotterR. B.BurkeJ. D.LoeberR.NavratilJ. L. (2002). Innovative retention methods in longitudinal research: A case study of the developmental trends study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 485–498.
15.
CotterR. B.BurkeJ. D.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR. (2005). Contacting participants for follow-up: How much effort is required to retain participants in longitudinal studies?Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(1), 15–21.
16.
CrisantiA. S.CaseB. F.IsaksonB. L.SteadmanH. J. (2014). Understanding study attrition in the evaluation of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness or co-occurring substance use disorders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(6), 772–790.
17.
DarengE. O.OlaniyanY.AdebamowoS. N.EseyinO. R.OdutolaM. K.ObiefunaE. M.OffiongR. A.PharoahP. P.AdebamowoC. A. (2018). Age, HIV status, and research context determined attrition in a longitudinal cohort in Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 100, 32–43.
18.
DavidovE.Yang-HansenK.GustafssonJ. E.SchmidtP.BambergS. (2006). Does money matter? A theory-driven growth mixture model to explain travel-mode choice with experimental data. Methodology, 2(3), 124–134.
19.
DerogatisL.MelisaratosN. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.
20.
GeorgeS.DuranN.NorrisK. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16–e31.
21.
GrapeA.RheeH.WicksM.Tumiel-BerhalterL.SloandE. (2018). Recruitment and retention strategies for an urban adolescent study: Lessons learned from a multi-center study of community-based asthma self-management intervention for adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 123–132.
22.
GreenS. M.NavratilJ. L.LoeberR.LaheyB. B. (1994). Potential dropouts in a longitudinal study: Prevalence, stability, and associated characteristics. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 69–87.
23.
GustavsonK.Von SoestT.KarevoldE.RoysambE. (2012). Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: Findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC Public Health, 12, 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-918
24.
HeidA. R.CartwrightF. P.Wilson-GendersonM.PruchnoR. (2021). Understanding attrition and bolstering retention in a longitudinal panel of older adults: ORANJ BOWL. Innovation in Aging, 5(2), igab010.
25.
HollingsheadA. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. Mimeo. Yale University.
26.
JacobsenE.RanX.LiuA.ChangC. C. H.GanguliM. (2021). Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal population-based study of aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 33(8), 767–778.
27.
KelfveS.ForsS.LennartssonC. (2017). Getting better all the time? Selective attrition and compositional changes in longitudinal and life-course studies. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8(1), 104–119.
28.
KijowskiM. C.WilsonT. (2022). Examining how conditioning on different wave lengths alters sample characteristics and results in a panel dataset of youth who have committed serious offenses. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 8(3), 481–515.
29.
LaphamS.BaumG.SkipperB.ChangI. (2000). Attrition in a follow-up study of driving while impaired offenders: Who is lost?Alcohol and Alcoholism, 35(5), 464–470.
30.
LugtigP. (2014). Panel attrition: Separating stayers, fast attriters, gradual attriters, and lurkers. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(4), 699–723.
31.
LynnP. (2018). Tackling panel attrition. In VannetteD. L.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 143–153). Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
MitchellM. M.FahmyC.ClarkK. J.PyroozD. C. (2022). Non-random study attrition: Assessing correction techniques and the magnitude of bias in a longitudinal study of reentry from prison. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38(3), 755–790.
33.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
34.
MulveyE. P. (2000–2010). Research on pathways to desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]: Subject measures, 2000-2010. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2
35.
NavratilJ. L.GreenS. M.LoeberR.LaheyB. B. (1994). Minimizing subject loss in a longitudinal study of deviant behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 89–106.
36.
NegriffS.JiJ.TrickettP. K. (2011). Exposure to peer delinquency as a mediator between self-report pubertal timing and delinquency: A longitudinal study of mediation. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 293–304.
37.
PichéG.FitzpatrickC.PaganiL. S. (2012). Kindergarten self-regulation as a predictor of body mass index and sports participation in fourth grade students. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), 19–26.
38.
RübsamenN.AkmatovM. K.CastellS.KarchA.MikolajczykR. T. (2017). Factors associated with attrition in a longitudinal online study: Results from the HaBIDS panel. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1–11.
39.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Crime & Delinquency, 39(3), 396–396.
40.
SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.LosoyaS. H.HeckerT.ChassinL.KnightG. P. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 237–255.
41.
Selner-O’HaganM.KindlonD.BukaS.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 215–224.
42.
SnowW. M.ConnettJ. E.SharmaS.MurrayR. P. (2007). Predictors of attendance and dropout at the Lung Health Study 11-year follow-up. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28(1), 25–32.
43.
SongX.WangL. (2017). Partially time-varying coefficient proportional hazards models with error-prone time-dependent covariates: An application to the AIDS Clinical Trial Group 175 data. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11, 274–296.
44.
SteinbergL. D.CauffmanE.MonahanK. (2015). Psychosocial maturity and desistance from crime in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
45.
ThornberryT. P.BjerregaardB.MilesW. (1993). The consequences of respondent attrition in panel studies: A simulation based on the Rochester Youth Development Study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 127–158.
46.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.
47.
UnderwoodL. A.WashingtonA. (2016). Mental illness and juvenile offenders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(2), 228.
48.
VaughnM. G.HowardM. O.FosterK. A.DaytonM. K.ZelnerJ. L. (2005). Substance use in a state population of incarcerated juvenile offenders. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 2(1–2), 155–173.
49.
WeinbergerD. A.SchwartzG. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 381–417.
50.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2018). The development of deviant peer association across the life-course and its relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4, 73–91.
51.
YoungA. F.PowersJ. R.BellS. L. (2006). Attrition in longitudinal studies: Who do you lose?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 30(4), 353–361.
52.
YuT.ChenJ.GuN. Y.HayJ. W.GongC. L. (2022). Predicting panel attrition in longitudinal HRQoL surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 104.
53.
ZethofD.NagelhoutG. E.de RooijM.DriezenP.FongG. T.van den PutteB.HummelK.de VriesH.ThompsonM. E.WillemsenM. C. (2016). Attrition analysed in five waves of a longitudinal yearly survey of smokers: Findings from the ITC Netherlands survey. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(4), 693–699.
54.
ZhangZ.ReinikainenJ.AdelekeK. A.PieterseM. E.Groothuis-OudshoornC. G. (2018). Time-varying covariates and coefficients in Cox regression models. Annals of Translational Medicine, 6(7), 121.
