Violence can result in insurmountable losses for victim-survivors. Restitutive and compensatory measures have been historically and contemporarily implemented to address these harms. Crime victim compensation (CVC) is a means by which the state reimburses victim-survivors of violent harm without relying on offender restitution. Overall, the current study argues that CVC laws and regulations may marginalize victim-survivors by regulating the body through crime-reporting and application time limits, as well as through wait times for compensation receipt. With this argument, the current study aims to use a content analysis and quantitative analysis to examine the intricacies of crime-reporting and application time limits detailed within statutes and administrative regulations across the 50 United States, as well as benefit receipt wait times.
BhattacharjeeA. (2002). Private fists and public force: Race, gender, and surveillance. In SillimanJ.BhattacharjeeA. (Eds.), Policing the national body: Sex, race, and criminalization (pp. 1–54). South End Press.
2.
CaresA. C.HaynesS. H.RubackR. B. (2015). Reducing the harm of criminal victimization: The role of restitution. Violence & Victims, 30(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00049
3.
CarsonS.CarterS. K. (2023). Abortion as public health risk in Covid-19 anti-abortion legislation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10449950
DanisF. S. (2003). Domestic violence and crime victim compensation: A research agenda. Violence Against Women, 9(3), 374–390.
7.
DonleyA. M.WrightJ. D. (2008). For richer or for poorer: The impact of state-level legislation on marriage, divorce, and other outcomes. Sociological Spectrum, 28(2), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170701796239
8.
EvansD. (2014). Compensating victims of crime. Research & Evaluation Center, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.
9.
FangX.BrownD. S.FlorenceC. S.MercyJ. A. (2012, February). The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(2), 156–165.
10.
HawkinsA. J.AmatoP. R.KinghornA. (2013). Are government-supported healthy marriage initiatives affecting family demographics? A state-level analysis. Family Relations, 62(3), 501–513.
11.
JosephsonJ. (2002). The intersectionality of domestic violence and welfare in the lives of poor women. Journal of Poverty, 6(1), 1–20.
12.
LeemisR. W.KhatiwadaF. N.ChenM.S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017: Report on intimate partner violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
13.
LevineJ. R.RussellK. L. (2023). Crime pays the victim: Criminal fines, the state, and victim compensation law 1964-1984. American Journal of Sociology, 128(4), 1158–1205.
14.
LiG.WalterS. D.ThabaneL. (2021). Shifting the focus away from binary thinking of statistical significance and towards education for key stakeholders: Revisiting the debate on whether it’s time to de-emphasize or get rid of statistical significance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 137, 104–112.
15.
MontanezJ.DonleyA.ReckdenwaldA. (2022). Between systems and violence: State-level policy targeting intimate partner violence in immigrant and refugee lives. Routledge.
16.
NewmarkL.BondermanJ.SmithB.LinerB. (2003). National evaluation of state Victims of Crime Act assistance and compensation programs: Trends and strategies for the future. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center. https://ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/203198.pdf
17.
Office for Victims of Crime. (2022a). Alabama: Annual performance measures report, 2021. [PDF file].
18.
Office for Victims of Crime. (2022b). Illinois: Annual performance measures report, 2021. [PDF file].
19.
Office for Victims of Crime. (2022c). Vermont: Annual performance measures report, 2021. [PDF file].
20.
PetersonC.DeGueS.FlorenceC.LokeyC. N. (2017). Lifetime economic burden of rape among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(6), 691–701.
21.
PetersonC.KearnsM. C.McIntoshW. L.EstefaL. F.NicolaidisC.McCollisterK. E.GordonA.FlorenceC. (2018). Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 433–444.
22.
PillemerK.FinkelhorD. (1988, February). The prevalence of elder abuse: A random sample survey. The Gerontologist, 28(1), 51–57.
23.
PoorE. (In press). Disentangling the civil-carceral state: An abolitionist framework for the non-criminal response to intimate partner violence. New York University Review of Law and Social Change. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4186152
24.
ReidM. (2013). Social policy, “deservingness,” and sociotemporal marginalization: Katrina survivors and FEMA. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 742–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12051
25.
RosenthalR.RubinD. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 166.
26.
SeefeldtK. S. (2017). Waiting it out: Time, action, and the process of obtaining social benefits. Qualitative Sociology, 16(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/1010.1177/1473325015606188
27.
TatumK. M.ClementK. (2007). An exploratory analysis of florida law enforcement domestic violence policies. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-007-9009-8
28.
ThompsonA.TappS. N. (2023). Criminal victimization, 2022. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
29.
WassersteinR. L.SchirmA. L.LazarN. A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond “p< 0.05”. The American Statistician, 73(1), 1–19.
ZerubavelE. (1976). Timetables and scheduling: On the social organization of time. Sociological Inquiry, 46(2), 87–94.
32.
ZerubavelE. (2020). The sociology of time. In ReineckeJ. R.SuddabyR.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Time, temporality, and history in the process of organization. (pp. 44–49) Oxford University Press.
