Prior research measures immigration by only accounting for where immigrants live. We argue that this approach misses the activity spaces of immigrants, which also impact crime but are not always located in their residential communities. The present study uses an alternative definition of immigration—immigrant-ethnic activity space (IEAS)—that accounts for both the residential location and routine activities of immigrants. Additionally, given the crime-reducing effects associated with immigration, including for high-risk populations, we consider whether IEAS protects against reoffending for ex-inmates. Using Cox hazards models, we examine the relationship between IEAS and recidivism across the communities of five ethnic groups. Results show that the IEAS of all groups are inversely associated with recidivism. However, ex-prisoner concentration amplifies the risk for recidivism in the IEAS of some groups.
AllisonP. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.
2.
AzoulayP.JonesB. F.KimJ. D.MirandaJ. (2022). Immigration and entrepreneurship in the United States. American Economic Review: Insights, 4(1), 71–88.
3.
BellairP. E.KowalskiB. R. (2011). Low-skill employment opportunity and African American-white difference in recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 176–208.
4.
BergM. T.HuebnerB. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410.
5.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press.
6.
BrieschR. A.ChintaguntaP. K.FoxE. J. (2009). How does assortment affect grocery store choice?Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 176–189.
7.
BrowningC. R.SollerB. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape, 16(1), 165–196.
8.
BursikB.GrasmickH. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime. Lexington Books.
9.
ChamberlainA. W.WallaceD. (2016). Mass reentry, neighborhood context and recidivism: Examining how the distribution of parolees within and across neighborhoods impacts recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 33(5), 912–941.
10.
ClearT. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press.
11.
DesmondS. A.KubrinC. E. (2009). The power of place: Immigrant communities and adolescent violence. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(4), 581–607.
12.
DiPietroS. M.BursikR. J.Jr. (2012). Studies of the new immigration: The dangers of pan-ethnic classifications. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641(1), 247–267.
13.
GutierrezC. M.KirkD. S. (2017). Silence speaks: The relationship between immigration and the underreporting of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 926–950.
14.
HippJ. R.PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48(4), 947–979.
15.
HippJ. R.YatesD. K. (2009). Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology, 47(3), 619–656.
16.
HosmerD.LemeshowS. (1999). Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data. Wiley.
17.
HouserK.McCordE. S.NicholsonJ. (2018). The influence of neighborhood risk factors on parolee recidivism in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Prison Journal, 98(3), 255–276.
18.
JacksonA. L.BrowningC. R.KrivoL. J.KwanM.WashingtonH. M. (2016). The role of immigrant concentration within and beyond residential neighborhoods in adolescent alcohol use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 17–34.
19.
KimS. (2009). Immigrants and transportation: An analysis of immigrant workers’ work trips. Cityscape, 11(3), 155–169.
20.
KimY.-A.HippJ. R. (2022). Small local versus non-local: Examining the relationship between locally owned small businesses and spatial patterns of crime. Justice Quarterly, 39(5), 983–1008.
21.
KimY.-A.HippJ. R.KubrinC. E. (2019). Where they live and go: Immigrant ethnic activity space and neighborhood crime in Southern California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 64, 1–12.
22.
KirkD. S. (2015). A natural experiment of the consequences of concentrating former prisoners in the same neighborhoods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 112(22), 6943–6948.
23.
KubrinC. E. (2013). Immigration and crime (CullenF. T.WilcoxP., Eds.). Oxford University Press.
24.
KubrinC. E.HippJ. R.KimY.-A. (2018). Different than the sum of its parts: Examining the unique impacts of immigrant groups on neighborhood crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 1–36.
25.
KubrinC. E.KimY.-A.HippJ. R. (2019). Institutional completeness and crime rates in immigrant neighborhoods. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(2), 175–212.
26.
KubrinC. E.StewartE. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165–197.
27.
LeeM. T.MartinezR. (2009). Immigration reduces crime: An emerging scholarly consensus. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 13, 3–16.
28.
LeyD. (2008). The immigrant church as an urban service hub. Urban Studies, 45(10), 2057–2074.
LoganJ. R.AlbaR. D.StultsB. J. (2003). Enclaves and entrepreneurs: Assessing the payoff for immigrants and minorities. International Migration Review, 37(2), 344–388.
31.
LyonsC. J.VélezM. B.SantoroW. A. (2013). Neighborhood immigration, violence, and city-level immigrant political opportunities. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 604–632.
32.
MartinezR.LeeM. T.NielsenA. L. (2004). Segmented assimilation, local context and determinants of drug violence in Miami and San Diego: Does ethnicity and immigration matter?The International Migration Review, 38(1), 131–157.
33.
Martínez-SchuldtR. D.MartínezD. E. (2021). Immigrant sanctuary policies and crime- reporting behavior: A multilevel analysis of reports of crime victimization to law enforcement, 1980 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 86(1), 154–185.
34.
MorenoffJ. D.HardingD. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 411–429.
35.
OuseyG. C.KubrinC. E. (2009). Exploring the connection between immigration and violent crime rates in U.S. cities, 1980–2000. Social Problems, 56(3), 447–473.
36.
OuseyG. C.KubrinC. E. (2018). Immigration and crime: Assessing a contentious issue. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 63–84.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.
39.
PapachristosV. A.SmithM. C.SchererL. M.FugieroA. M. (2011). More coffee, less crime? The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City & Community, 10(3), 215–240.
40.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
41.
PiatkowskaS. J.CamachoJ. (2022). Foreign-born arrestees and recidivism: Multilevel analysis of arrest data from a Florida county sheriff’s office. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 77, 479–501.
42.
PortesA.JensenL. (1992). Disproving the enclave hypothesis: Reply. American Sociological Review, 57, 418–420.
43.
PortesA.StepickA. (1993). City on the edge: The transformation of Miami. University of California Press.
44.
RameyD. M. (2013). Immigrant revitalization and neighborhood violent crime in established and new destination cities. Social Forces, 92(2), 597–629.
45.
RamiroM.LeeM. T. (2000). On Immigration and Crime. In LafreeG.BursikR. J.Sr.ShortJ.TaylorR. B. (Eds.), In criminal justice 2000: the Nature of crime: Continuity and change (Vol.1, pp. 485–524). U.S. Department of Justice.
46.
RamosJ. (2023). Immigration in era of mass reentry: Does immigrant concentration reduce prisoner recidivism?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 60(2), 213–254.
47.
RamosJ.HernandezC.ShelferD. (2023). Illuminating the immigration–crime nexus: A test of the immigration revitalization perspective. Societies, 13(6), 137.
48.
RamosJ.WengerM. R. (2020). Immigration and recidivism: What is the link?Justice Quarterly, 37(3), 436–460.
49.
RoseD. R.ClearT. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36(3), 441–480.
50.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley.
51.
SampsonR. J. (2015). Immigration and America’s Urban Revival. American Prospect , 20–24.
52.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.RaudenbushS. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224–232.
53.
SandersJ. M.NeeV. (1987). Limits of ethnic solidarity in the enclave economy. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 745–773.
54.
StahlerG. J.MennisJ.BelenkoS.WelshW. N.HillerM. L.ZajacG. (2013). Predicting recidivism for released state prison offenders: Examining the influence of individual and neighborhood characteristics and spatial contagion on the likelihood of reincarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(6), 690–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812469609
55.
StansfieldR. (2014). Safer cities: A macro-level analysis of recent immigration, Hispanic- owned businesses, and crime rates in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(3), 503–518.
56.
StataCorp. (2021). Stata statistical software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC.
57.
TonryM. (1997). Ethnicity, crime, and immigration. Crime and Justice, 21, 1–29.
58.
TillyerM. S.VoseB. (2011). Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 452–459.
59.
VélezM. B. (2001). The role of public social control in urban neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of victimization risk. Criminology, 39(4), 837–864.
60.
VélezM. B. (2009). Contextualizing the immigration and crime effect: An analysis of homicide in Chicago neighborhoods. Homicide Studies, 13(3), 325–335.
61.
VigdorJ. L. (2013). Immigration and the revival of American cities: From preserving manufacturing jobs to strengthening the housing market. New American Economy, 1–34.
WangX.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2010). Race-specific employment contexts and recidivism. Criminology, 48(4), 1171–1211.
64.
WengerM. R. (2021). Omitted level bias in multilevel research: An empirical test distinguishing block group, tract, and city effects of disadvantage on crime. Justice Quarterly, 38(5), 792–826.
65.
WilsonK. L.PortesA. (1980). Immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami. American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1086/227240
66.
WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.IntraviaJ.PiqueroA. R. (2015). The protective impact of immigrant concentration on juvenile recidivism: A statewide analysis of youth offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 522–531.
67.
WrightE. M.BensonM. L. (2010). Immigration and intimate partner violence: Exploring the immigrant paradox. Social Problems, 57(3), 480–503.
68.
XieM.BaumerE. P. (2018). Reassessing the breadth of the protective benefit of immigrant neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of violence risk by race, ethnicity, and labor market stratification. Criminology, 56(2), 302–332.
69.
ZhouM. (2004). Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: Convergences, controversies, and conceptual advancements. International Migration Review, 38, 1040–1074.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
