Prior research on juvenile court processing indicates that legal and extralegal factors impact outcomes at judicial disposition. Less is known, however, if the combined effects of certain characteristics influence decision-making. Applying the liberation hypothesis, this study investigates the interactive effects of a juvenile’s age, race/ethnicity, and offense severity on dispositional outcomes. Using all adjudicated complaints from North Carolina between 2011 and 2018, results suggest that irrespective of a juvenile’s age, youth of color had greater odds of receiving residential placement than community-based sanctions. Regardless of offense severity, Black youth were treated more punitively than Hispanics and Whites. Findings underscore the importance of acknowledging disparities in case outcomes and creating programming options within juvenile justice to meet the needs of youth of color.
AalsmaM. C.TongY.LaneK.KatzB.RosenmanM. B. (2012). Use of outpatient care by juvenile detainees upon community reentry: effects of mental health screening and referral. Psychiatric Services, 63(10), 997–1003.
2.
BairdC.HealyT.JohnsonK.BogieA.DankertE. W.ScharenbrochC. (2013). A comparison of risk assessment instruments in juvenile justice. National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3.
Beaudry-CyrM.LeiberM.BrubakerS. J.JaynesC. (2020). The liberation hypothesis perspective and juvenile court outcomes: Implications for an understanding of the interplay between offender and offense characteristics. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 806–836.
4.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 392.
5.
BishopD. M.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 213–233.
6.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554–570.
7.
BruceM.BridgelandJ. (2014). The mentoring effect: Young people’s perspectives on the outcomes and availability of mentoring. A report for mentor: The national mentoring partnership. Civic Enterprises.
8.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.
9.
BrysonS. L.PeckJ. H. (2021). The effects of age, race, and offense type on receiving a ‘youth discount’ in juvenile court. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(3), 304–323.
10.
CassidyM.RydbergJ. (2020). Does sentence type and length matter? Interactions of age, race, ethnicity, and gender on jail and prison sentences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(1), 61–79.
11.
CaudillJ. W.MorrisR. G.SayedS. E.YunM.DeLisiM. (2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 183–195.
12.
CauffmanE.PiqueroA. R.KimonisE.SteinbergL.ChassinL.FaganJ. (2007). Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31(6), 519–535.
13.
ChampionD. (2001). The juvenile justice system: Delinquency, processing, and the law. Prentice-Hall.
14.
ChildsK. K.PeckJ. H.BradyC. M. (2022). Predictive bias in juvenile risk assessment: Considering race/ethnicity and sex. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221143936
15.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2015). Race, ethnic, and gender divides in juvenile court sanctioning and rehabilitative intervention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 181–212.
16.
ElligsonR. L.PeckJ. H.RayJ. V. (2021). Juvenile court outcomes for retail offenders: An examination of offense type, sex, and race/ethnicity. Crime & Delinquency, 68(9), 1427–1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211022621
17.
EngenR. L.SteenS.BridgesG. S. (2002). Racial disparities in the punishment of youth: A theoretical and empirical assessment of the literature. Social Problems, 49(2), 194–220.
18.
EpsteinR.BlakeJ.GonzálezT. (2017). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of black girls’ childhood. Center on Poverty and Inequality. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3000695
19.
EvangelistM.RyanJ. P.VictorB. G.MooreA.PerronB. E. (2017). Disparities at adjudication in the juvenile justice system: An examination of race, gender, and age. Social Work Research, 41(4), 199–212.
20.
FaderJ. J.KurlychekM. C.MorganK. A. (2014). The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions. Social Science Research, 44, 126–140.
21.
FarringtonD. P. (1986). Age and crime. Crime and Justice, 7, 189–250.
22.
FeldB. C. (1997). Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility, and sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88(1), 68–88.
23.
FeldB. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. NYU Press.
24.
GannS. M. (2019). Examining the relationship between race and juvenile court decision-making: A counterfactual approach. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(3), 269–287.
25.
GilmoreA. A.BettisP. J. (2021). Antiblackness and the adultification of Black children in a US prison nation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
26.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.Di LeoneB. A. L.CulottaC. M.DiTomassoN. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526.
27.
GrahamS.LoweryB. S. (2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 483–504.
28.
GuevaraL.BoydL. M.TaylorA. P.BrownR. A. (2011). Racial disparities in juvenile court outcomes: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 9(3), 200–217.
29.
GuevaraL.ShekarkharZ.FullerK. (2018). When does race matter in juvenile court outcomes? A test of the “type of offense” hypothesis. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 69(4), 5–24.
30.
HauserW.PeckJ. H. (2017). The intersection of crime seriousness, discretion, and race: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 166–192.
31.
HockenberryS. (2022). Juveniles in residential placement, 2019. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
32.
JordanK. L.BowmanR. (2022). Interacting race/ethnicity and legal factors on sentencing decisions: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Corrections, 7(2), 87–106.
33.
KalvenH.ZeiselH. (1966). The American jury. Little, Brown.
34.
LehmannP. S.MeldrumR. C.GreenwaldM. A. (2020). Upward departures from structured recommendations in juvenile court dispositions: The intersection of race, ethnicity, and gender. Justice Quarterly, 37(3), 514–540.
35.
LehmannP. S. (2021). Juvenile transfer status and the sentencing of violent offenders: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(4), 430–449.
36.
LeiberM. J. (2016). Race, prior offending, and juvenile court outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 88–106.
37.
LeiberM. J.FoxB.EscueM.KrupaJ. M.CochranJ. K. (2020). Race/ethnicity and the effects of prior case outcomes on current dispositions: Continuity and change in the dispositional careers of juvenile offenders. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 789–816.
38.
LeiberM. J.JohnsonJ. D. (2008). Being young and black: What are their effects on juvenile justice decision making?Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 560–581.
39.
LeiberM. J.MackK. Y. (2002). Race, age, and juvenile justice decision making. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25(2), 23–47.
40.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H. (2013). Probation violations and juvenile justice decision making: Implications for Blacks and Hispanics. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(1), 60–78.
41.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.Beaudry-CyrM. (2016). The likelihood of a “youth discount” in juvenile court sanctions: The influence of offender race, gender, and age. Race and Justice, 6(1), 5–34.
42.
LipseyM. W.DerzonJ. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Sage Publications, Inc.
43.
LoeberR. (2012). Does the study of the age-crime curve have a future? In LoeberR.WelshB. C. (Eds.), The Future of Criminology (pp. 11–19). Oxford Academic.
44.
MahomesA. (2021). You rolled your eyes at me: The effects of stereotypes and implicit bias on black girls and discipline in the classroom. Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty, 10(1), 21590.
45.
McCaffertyJ. T. (2018). Unjust disparities? The impact of race on juvenile risk assessment outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(5), 423–442.
46.
McGuireM. D. (2002). Cumulative disadvantage as an explanation for observed disproportionality within the juvenile justice system: An empirical test. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 53(1), 1–17.
47.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.StultsB. J.GreenmanS. J.BhatiA. S.GreenwaldM. A. (2014). The “true” juvenile offender: Age effects and juvenile court sanctioning. Criminology, 52(2), 169–194.
48.
MonahanK.SteinbergL.PiqueroA. R. (2015). Juvenile justice policy and practice: A developmental perspective. Crime and Justice, 44(1), 577–619.
49.
MooreL. D.PadavicI. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparities in girls’ sentencing in the juvenile justice system. Feminist Criminology, 5(3), 263–285.
50.
MooreL. D.PadavicI. (2011). Risk assessment tools and racial/ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. Sociology Compass, 5(10), 850–858.
51.
MorrowW. J.DarioL. M.RodriguezN. (2015). Examining the prevalence of a ‘youth discount’ in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(4), 473–490.
52.
PeckJ.H. (2018). The importance of evaluation and monitoring within the disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate: Future directions injuvenile justice research. Race & Justice, 8(4), 305–329.
53.
PeckJ. H.JenningsW. G. (2016). A critical examination of “being Black” in the juvenile justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 219.
54.
RaposaE. B.EricksonL. D.HaglerM.RhodesJ. E. (2018). How economic disadvantage affects the availability and nature of mentoring relationships during the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1–2), 191–203.
55.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 391–413.
56.
RovnerJ. (2021). Racial disparities in youth incarceration persists. United States Sentencing Commission.
57.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311–374.
58.
SchwalbeC. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: a meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 449–462.
59.
SeiterR. P.KadelaK. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49(3), 360–388.
60.
SpinneyE.YeideM.FeyerhermW.CohenM.StephensonR.ThomasC. (2016). Racial disparities in referrals to mental health and substance abuse services from the juvenile justice system: A review of the literature. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 153–173.
61.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, process, & decisions of the criminal justice system: Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 427–501). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
62.
SpohnC.CederblomJ. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8(3), 305–327.
63.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.
64.
Stepteau-WatsonD.WatsonJ.LawrenceS. K. (2014). Young African American males in reentry: An Afrocentric cultural approach. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(6), 658–665.
65.
SullivanC. J. (2019). Taking juvenile justice seriously: Developmental insights and system challenges. Temple University Press.
66.
TapiaM. (2010). Untangling race and class effects on juvenile arrests. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 255–265.
67.
TaylorA.GuevaraL.BoydL. M.BrownR. A. (2012). Race, geography, and juvenile justice: An exploration of the liberation hypothesis. Race and Justice, 2(2), 114–137.
ZaneS. N.CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2021). Deservingness and punishment in juvenile justice: Do black youth grow up “faster” in the eyes of the court?Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 20(1), 41–62.
70.
ZaneS. N.PupoJ. A. (2021). Disproportionate minority contact in the juvenile justice system: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1293–1318.
71.
ZaneS. N.WelshB. C.MearsD. P.ZimmermanG. M. (2022). Pathways through juvenile justice: A system-level assessment of cumulative disadvantage in the processing of juvenile offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38(2), 483–514.
