The Influence of Formal and Informal Sanctions on Offending: The Moderating Role of Legal Cynicism

Abstract

Work on deterrence demonstrates that high perceptions of formal sanctions (e.g., arrest) and informal sanctions (e.g., negative reactions from others) both relate to decreased offending behaviors. However, there are numerous contextual factors that influence the strength of formal and informal sanctions on crime. The current study uses the Pathways to Desistance data to explore how formal and informal sanctions relate to offending, and how legal cynicism moderates this process. Findings from a series of longitudinal models show that higher perceptions of both formal and informal sanctions are related to decreased offending, while higher legal cynicism is linked to increased offending. Legal cynicism moderates the relationship between formal—but not informal—sanctions and offending. Policy implications are explored.

Keywords

offending deterrence juvenile delinquency arrest

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(1991). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. SAS Institute.

Anderson

(1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W. W. Norton.

Anderson

L. S.

Chiricos

T. G.

Waldo

G. P.

(1977). Formal and informal sanctions: A comparison of deterrent effects. Social Problems, 25(1), 103–114.

Augustyn

M. B.

(2015). The (ir)relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 388–401.

Augustyn

M. B.

(2016). Updating perceptions of (in)justice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(2), 255–286.

Azur

M. J.

Stuart

E. A.

Frangakis

Leaf

P. J.

(2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(1), 40–49.

Beccaria

(1963). On crimes and punishments. Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1764)

Bernburg

J. G.

Krohn

M. D.

(2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.

Bossler

A. M.

(2021). Perceived formal and informal sanctions in deterring cybercrime in a college sample. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(3), 452–470.

10.

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119–170.

11.

Braithwaite

(1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.

12.

Brown

S. L.

(1998). Associations between peer drink driving, peer attitudes towards drink driving, and personal drink driving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 423–436.

13.

Carr

P. J.

Napolitano

Keating

(2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45(2), 445–480.

14.

Cauffman

Steinberg

(2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(6), 741–760.

15.

Cochran

J. K.

Chamlin

M. B.

Wood

P. B.

Sellers

C. S.

(1999). Shame, embarrassment, and formal sanction threats: Extending the deterrence/rational choice model to academic dishonesty. Sociological Inquiry, 69(1), 91–105.

16.

Dölling

Entorf

Hermann

Rupp

(2009). Is deterrence effective? Results of a meta-analysis of punishment. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 201–224.

17.

Emery

C. R.

Jolley

J. M.

(2011). Desistance from intimate partner violence: The role of legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and social disorganization in Chicago neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 373–383.

18.

Fagan

Piquero

A. R.

(2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748.

19.

Fagan

Tyler

T. R.

(2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217–241.

20.

Foglia

W. D.

Sandys

(2017). The capital jury and sentencing: Neither guided nor individualized. In Bohm

R. M.

Lee

(Eds.), Routledge handbook on capital punishment (pp. 364–384). Routledge.

21.

Gibbs

J. P.

(1968). Crime, punishment and deterrence. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48, 515–530.

22.

Glassner

Ksander

Berg

Johnson

B. D.

(1983). A note on the deterrent effect of juvenile vs. adult jurisdiction. Social Problems, 31, 219–221.

23.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

24.

Grasmick

H. G.

Bursik

R. J.

Jr. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24(3), 837–862.

25.

Hirschi

(1969). The causes of delinquency. University of California Press.

26.

Hofer

M. S.

Womack

S. R.

Wilson

M. N.

(2020). An examination of the influence of procedurally just strategies on legal cynicism among urban youth experiencing police contact. Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 104–123.

27.

Huizinga

Esbensen

Weihar

(1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118.

28.

Kaiser

Reisig

M. D.

(2019). Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: The role of procedural justice and legal orientations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35, 135–154.

29.

Kaviani

Young

K. L.

Robards

Koppel

(2020). Understanding the deterrent impact formal and informal sanctions have on illegal smartphone use while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 145, 105706.

30.

Kirk

D. S.

(2016). Prisoner reentry and the reproduction of legal cynicism. Social Problems, 63(2), 222–243.

31.

Kirk

D. S.

Matsuda

(2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49(2), 443–472.

32.

Kirk

D. S.

Papachristos

A. V.

(2011). Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1190–1233.

33.

Kirk

D. S.

Papachristos

A. V.

Fagan

Tyler

T. R.

(2012). The paradox of law enforcement in immigrant communities: Does tough immigration enforcement undermine public safety? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641, 79–98.

34.

Loughran

T. A.

Wilson

Nagin

D. S.

Piquero

A. R.

(2015). Evolutionary regression? Assessing the problem of hidden biases in criminal justice applications using propensity scores. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 631–652.

35.

Meier

R. F.

Johnson

W. T.

(1977). Deterrence as social control: The legal and extralegal production of conformity. American Sociological Review, 42(2), 292–304.

36.

Morris

(1966). Impediments to penal reform. The University of Chicago Law Review, 33, 627–656.

37.

Mowen

T. J.

Boman

J. H.

(2018). Deterrence’s element of sanction certainty: Friendships, vicarious experiences, and underage alcohol use. Substance Use & Misuse, 53(9), 1529–1538.

38.

Mowen

T. J.

Brent

J. J.

Bares

K. J.

(2018). How arrest impacts delinquency over time between and within individuals. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 16(4), 358–377.

39.

Mulvey

E. P.

Schubert

C. A.

Piquero

(2014). Pathways to desistance: Final technical report. National Institute of Justice.

40.

Mulvey

E. P.

Steinberg

Fagan

Cauffman

Piquero

A. R.

Chassin

Knight

G. P.

Brame

Schubert

C. A.

Hecker

Losoya

S. H.

(2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adult offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 213–236.

41.

Nivette

A. E.

Eisner

Malti

Ribeaud

(2015). The social and developmental antecedents of legal cynicism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 270–298.

42.

Paccagnella

(2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66–85.

43.

Paternoster

(1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 173–217.

44.

Paternoster

(2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 765–823.

45.

Pathways to Desistance. (2004a). Indices of personal and social costs and rewards – Subject follow-up. Accessed July 2022, from http://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook/personal-and-social-costs-and-rewards-sf.html

46.

Pathways to Desistance. (2004b). Neighborhood conditions – Subject baseline. Accessed July 2022, from http://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook/neighborhood-conditions-sb.html

47.

Pathways to Desistance. (2004c). Pathways to desistance – Codebook. Accessed July 2022, from http://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook.html

48.

Pathways to Desistance. (2004d). Self-reported offending – Subject follow-up. Accessed July 2022, from http://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook/docs/Question%20text_Self%20Reported%20Offending_followup.pdf

49.

Pathways to Desistance. (2004e). Weinberger Adjustment Inventory (WAI)—Subject follow-up. Accessed July 2022, from https://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook/wai-sf.html

50.

Piliavin

Gartner

Thornton

Matsueda

R. L.

(1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 101–119.

51.

Piquero

A. R.

Pogarsky

(2002). Beyond Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence: Personal and vicarious experiences, impulsivity, and offending behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 153–186.

52.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

Blevins

K. R.

Daigle

L. E.

Madensen

T. D.

(2017). In Cullen

Wright

J. P.

Blevins

K. R.

(Eds.), The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In Taking stock (pp. 367–395). Routledge.

53.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2008). Generalized linear mixed-effects models. In Fitzmaurice

Davidian

Verbeke

Molenberghs

(Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis (pp. 93–120). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

54.

Reisig

M. D.

Wolfe

S. E.

Holtfreter

(2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The non-confounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1265–1279.

55.

Salem

R. G.

Bowers

W. J.

(1970). Severity of formal sanctions as a deterrent to deviant behavior. Law & Society Review, 5(1), 21–40.

56.

Sampson

R. J.

(1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. Crime and Justice, 8, 271–311.

57.

Sampson

R. J.

Bartusch

D. J.

(1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 777–804.

58.

Sampson

R. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Raudenbush

(2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 224–232.

59.

Schubert

C. A.

Mulvey

E. P.

Pitzer

(2016). Differentiating serious adolescent offenders who exit the justice system from those who do not. Criminology, 54(1), 56–85.

60.

Schubert

C. A.

Mulvey

E. P.

Steinberg

Cauffman

Losoya

S. H.

Hecker

Chassin

Knight

G. P.

(2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 237–255.

61.

Sherman

L. W.

(1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(4), 445–473.

62.

Spivak

A. L.

Fukushima

Kelley

M. S.

Jenson

T. S.

(2011). Religiosity, delinquency, and the deterrent effects of informal sanctions. Deviant Behavior, 32(8), 677–711.

63.

Sunshine

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548.

64.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology. Lippincott.

65.

Tittle

C. R.

(1969). Crime rates and legal sanctions. Social Problems, 16, 409–423.

66.

Trinkner

Cohn

E. S.

(2014). Putting the “social” back in legal socialization: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 602–617.

67.

Tyler

(1990). Why people obey the law.Yale University Press.

68.

Tyler

(2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminology, 7, 307–359.

69.

Tyler

Fagan

(2008). Legitimacy, compliance, and cooperation: Procedural justice and citizen ties to the law. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

70.

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357.

71.

Tyler

T. R.

Jackson

(2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 20(1), 78–95.

72.

Von Hippel

P. T

. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117.

73.

Ward

J. T.

Krohn

M. D.

Gibson

C. L.

(2014). The effects of police contact on trajectories of violence: A group-based, propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 440–475.

74.

Williams

K. R.

Hawkins

(1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review, 20(4), 545–572.

75.

Wojciechowski

(2020). The relevance of the dual systems model of self-control for age-related deceleration in offending variety among juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice Journal, 70, 101716.

76.

Worrall

J. L.

Els

Piquero

A. R.

TenEyck

(2014). The moderating effects of informal social control in the sanctions-compliance nexus. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 341–357.

77.

Zimring

F. E.

Hawkins

(1986). Dangerousness and criminal justice. Michigan Law Review, 85, 481–509.