Violence interrupters (VI) operate as mediators after gang-involved shootings to stop retributory shootings. While some cities, like Chicago, have seen initial success, other cities, such as Boston, Newark, and Phoenix have seen little or mixed effects. This is the first evaluation of the Washington DC intervention. I use an interrupted time series model to measure the impact the intervention had on the rates of assaults with a gun using DC Crime Incident data. Recognizing that the Covid-19 pandemic is an important confounding event, I also run two time-series control models, a location control, and an outcome control. My findings indicate that the program was not effective in reducing gun violence.
AltheimerI.Duda-BanwarJ.SchreckC. J. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on community-based violence interventions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 810–819.
2.
BarnaM. (2021). Violence interrupters using tested methods to save lives. The Nations Health
3.
BernalJ.CumminsS.GasparriniA. (2018). The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions. International Journal of Epidemiology, 47(6), 2082–2093.
4.
BernalJ. L.CumminsS.GasparriniA. (2017). Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(1), 348–355.
BoyleD.LantermanJ.PascarellaJ.ChengC. (2010). Impact of Newark’s operation ceasefire. Violence Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.
7.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD.TurchanB. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250.
8.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), 323–358.
9.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006a). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 613–640.
10.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006b). Gender, race, and urban policing: The experience of African American youths. Gender & Society, 20(4), 531–552.
11.
BrunsonR. K.WadeB. A. (2019). Oh hell no, we don't talk to police” Insights on the lack of cooperation in police investigations of urban gun violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(3), 623–648.
12.
ButtsJ. A.RomanC. G.BostwickL.PorterJ. R. (2015). Cure violence: A public health model to reduce gun violence. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 39–53.
13.
ByrdsongT. R.DevanA.YamataniH. (2016). A ground-up model for gun violence reduction: A community-based public health approach. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(1), 76–86.
CircoG.KrupaJ. M.McGarrellE.DeBiasiA. (2020). The individual-level deterrent effect of “call-in” meetings on time to re-arrest. Crime & Delinquency, 66(11), 1630–1651.
Coalitionto Stop Gun Violence. (2021). A public health crisis decades in the making: A review of 2019 CDC gun mortality data. Retrieved September 15, 2021, from https://efsgv.org/wp-content/uploads/2019CDCdata.pdf
19.
CorburnJ.BogganD.MuttaqiK. (2021). Urban safety, community healing & gun violence reduction: The advance peace model. Urban Transformations, 3(1), 1–12.
20.
CorsaroN.EngelR. S. (2015). Most challenging of contexts: Assessing the impact of focused deterrence on serious violence in New Orleans. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(3), 471–505.
Dedios SanguinetiM. C.Yepes FialloV.Valencia GarzónM. J.Noy RobayoA.PughJ. D.Vecino OrtizA.I. (2023). Social norms and interventions on peer violence: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Adolescent Research Review, 8, 63–73.
24.
DelgadoS. A.AlsabahiL.WolffK.AlexanderN.CobarP.ButtsJ. A. (2017). The effects of cure violence in the South Bronx and East New York, Brooklyn. John Jay School of Criminal Justice. Retrieved March 2, 2022, from https://johnjayrec.nyc/2017/10/02/cvinsobronxeastny/
FoxA. M.KatzC. M.ChoateD. E.HedbergE. C. (2015). Evaluation of the Phoenix TRUCE Project: A replication of Chicago CeaseFire. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 85–115.
27.
GauJ. M.BrunsonR. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279.
28.
JohnsonB. T.SistiA.BernsteinM.ChenK.HennessyE. A.AcabchukR. L.MatosM. (2021). Community-level factors and incidence of gun violence in the United States, 2014–2017. Social Science & Medicine, 280, 113969.
29.
KoppelS.CapellanJ. A.SharpJ. (2022). Disentangling the impact of covid-19: An interrupted time series analysis of crime in New York City. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(6), 1–27.
30.
LindenA. (2015). Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 15, 480–500.
31.
MaguireE. (2012). Chicago’s Ceasefire and the community-based violence interruption movement. Unpublished manuscript.
32.
MakariosM. D.PrattT. C. (2012). The effectiveness of policies and programs that attempt to reduce firearm violence: A meta-analysis. Crime and Delinquency, 58(2), 222–244.
33.
McDowallD.LoftinC.PateM. (2012). Seasonal cycles in crime, and their variability. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 389–410.
34.
NaginD. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty first century: A review of the evidence. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp.199–263). University of Chicago Press.
Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. (2021b). AG Racine Announces Expansion of Cure the Streets Violence Reduction Program to Four New Neighborhoods. Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://oag.dc.gov/release/ag-racine-announces-expansion-cure-streets
38.
Open Data DC. (2023). DC Crime Incident Data. Retrieved March 16, 2023, 24, 2021, from https://opendata.dc.gov/
39.
PapachristosA. V. (2011). Too big to fail: The science and politics of violence prevention. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 1053–1061.
Picard-FritscheS.CernigliaL. (2013). Testing a public health approach to gun violence: An evaluation of crown heights save our streets, a replication of the cure violence model. Cent. Court Innov.
42.
RansfordC.JohnsonT.DeckerB.PayneM.SlutkinG. (2016). The relationship between the Cure Violence model and citywide increases and decreases in killings in Chicago (2000–2016). Cure Violence Report.
43.
ReichertJ.SmithV.AdamsS.GleicherL.HillL.EscamillaJ. (2018). Focused deterrence: A policing strategy to combat gun violence. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
44.
RiemannM. (2019). Problematizing the medicalization of violence: A critical discourse analysis of the ‘Cure Violence ‘initiative. Critical Public Health, 29(2), 146–155.
45.
RoehlJ.RosenbaumD. P.CostelloS. K.ColdrenJ. R.SchuckA. M.KunardL.FordeD. R. (2005). Strategic approaches to Community Safety Initiative (SACSI) in 10 U.S. cities: The building blocks for Project Safe Neighborhoods (Final Report No. 212866). National Institute of Justice.
46.
Sierra-ArevaloM.CharetteY.PapachristosA. V. (2017). Evaluating the effect of project longevity on group-involved shootings and homicides in New Haven, Connecticut. Crime & Delinquency, 63(4), 446–467.
TillyerM. S.EngelR. S.LovinsB. (2012). Beyond Boston: Applying theory to understand and address sustainability issues in focused deterrence initiatives for violence reduction. Crime and Delinquency, 58(6), 973–997.
50.
WebsterD. W.WhitehillJ.VernickJ. S.ParkerE. M. (2012). Evaluation of Baltimore’s safe streets program: Effects on attitudes, participants’ experiences, and gun violence. Johns Hopkins Cent. Prev. Youth Violence.
51.
WeitzerR. (2015). American policing under fire: Misconduct and reform. Society, 52, 475–480.
52.
WhitehillJ. M.WebsterD. W.FrattaroliS.ParkerE. M. (2014). Interrupting violence: how the CeaseFire program prevents imminent gun violence through conflict mediation. Journal of Urban Health, 91(1), 84–95.
53.
WilsonJ. M.ChermakS.McGarrellE. F. (2011). Community-based violence prevention: An assessment of Pittsburgh’s one vision one life program. RAND.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
