Differential Effects of Procedural Justice? Examining Heterogeneity in the Perceptions and Effects of Procedural Justice Across First-Time and Recurrent Detainees

Abstract

Several scholars have suggested that perceptions of procedural justice matter less for legitimacy beliefs and compliant behavior among serious offenders, but it remains unknown to what extent this also holds true for male detainees interacting with multiple criminal justice authorities. Using longitudinal data from the Prison Project on adult detainees entering Dutch pre-trial detention centers, the current study examines whether effects of procedural justice—arising from encounters with police officers, prison staff, and judges—on felt obligation to obey and recidivism operate in a different manner for first-time detainees and recurrent detainees. Our findings support the idea that procedural justice exerts differential effects on beneficial outcomes depending on detainees’ prior detention experience.

Keywords

procedural justice obligation to obey reoffending police prison staff judge detainees first-time detainees recurrent detainees

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aebi

M. F.

Berger-Kolopp

Burkhardt

Tiago

M. M.

(2019). Prisons in Europe: 2005-2015. Volume 1: Country Profiles. Council of Europe.

Alward

L. M.

Baker

Gordon

J. A.

(2021). Procedural justice and incarcerated people’s obligation to obey institutional rules: An examination of current, former, and never-gang members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73, 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101757

Augustyn

M. B.

(2015). The (ir)relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000122

Baker

(2017). Exploring the relationship of shared race/ethnicity with court actors, perceptions of court procedural justice, and obligation to obey among male offenders. Race and Justice, 7(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716650728

Baker

Gau

J. M.

(2018). Female offenders’ perceptions of police procedural justice and their obligation to obey the law. Crime & Delinquency, 64(6), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717719418

Baker

Pickett

J. T.

Amin

D. M.

Golden

Dhungana

Gertz

Bedard

(2015). Shared race/ethnicity, court procedural justice, and self-regulating beliefs: A study of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 49(2), 433–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12137

Barkworth

J. M.

Murphy

(2021). Procedural justice, posturing and defiant action: Exploring prisoner reactions to prison authority. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1666905

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Eichelsheim

V. I.

Van der Laan

P. H.

Nieuwbeerta

(2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550710

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Nieuwbeerta

(2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609643

10.

Bolger

P. C.

Walters

G. D.

(2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001

11.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2016). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

12.

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

13.

Chen

(2007). Sensitivity goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.

14.

Dervan

L. E.

(2011). American prison culture in an international context: An examination of prisons in America, The Netherlands, and Israel. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22(2), 413–428.

15.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Nieuwbeerta

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Bosma

A. Q.

de Cuyper

Doekhie

Eichelsheim

de Goede

van der Laan

P. H.

Lamet

Palmen

Raaijmakers

Ramakers

Reef

van der Stelt

Wensveen

Wermink

(2018). Cohort profile: The prison project—a study of criminal behavior and life circumstances before, during, and after imprisonment in the Netherlands. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0077-2

16.

Fagan

Piquero

A. R.

(2007). Rational choice and dvelopmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 715–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00105.x

17.

Fox

Moule

R. K.

Jaynes

C. M.

Parry

M. M.

(2021). Are the effects of legitimacy and its components invariant? Operationalization and the generality of Sunshine and Tyler’s empowerment hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820926228

18.

Hough

Jackson

Bradford

Myhill

Quinton

(2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq027

19.

Jackson

Bradford

Hough

Myhill

Quinton

Tyler

T. R.

(2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032

20.

Jackson

Oliveira

T. R.

Bradford

Mendes

S. M.

Lima Natal

Zanetic

(2022). Fear and legitimacy in São Paulo, Brazil: Police-citizen relations in a high violence, high fear city. Law & Society Review, 56(1), 122-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12589

21.

Jackson

Tyler

T. R.

Bradford

Taylor

Shiner

(2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10.

22.

Jaynes

C. M.

Loughran

T. A.

(2019). Social preferences as an individual difference in offender decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 129–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818798684

23.

Kaiser

Reisig

M. D.

(2019). Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: The role of procedural justice and legal orientations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4

24.

Lickens

De Looff

(2013). Gevangeniswezen in getal 2007-2011. Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen.

25.

Liebling

Arnold

(2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford University Press.

26.

Lind

E. A.

Van den Bos

(2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In Staw

B. M.

Kramer

R. M.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical review (pp. 181–223). Elsevier Science/JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X

27.

Maguire

E. R.

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

Wells

(2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38(6), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753

28.

McGloin

J. M.

Piquero

A. R.

(2010). On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427809348905

29.

Murphy

Bradford

Jackson

(2016). Motivating compliance behavior among offenders: Procedural justice or deterrence? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815611166

30.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus users’ guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

31.

Papachristos

A. V.

Meares

T. L.

Fagan

(2012). Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(2), 397–440.

32.

Paternoster

Brame

Mazerolle

Piquero

A. R.

(1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x

33.

Penner

E. K.

Viljoen

J. L.

Douglas

K. S.

Roesch

(2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000055

34.

Pina-Sánchez

Brunton-Smith

(2021). Are we equally persuaded by procedural justice? Re-examining the invariance thesis using longitudinal data and random effects. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 7, 449–480.

35.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J. Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

36.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

37.

Savigar-Shaw

Radburn

Stott

Kyprianides

Tallent

(2021). Procedural justice as a reward to the compliant: An ethnography of police-citizen interaction in police custody. Policing & Society, 32(6), 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1960332

38.

Skinns

(2011). Police custody governance, legitimacy and reform in the criminal justice process. Routledge.

39.

Sparks

Bottoms

Hay

(1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Clarendon Press.

40.

Sprott

J. B.

Greene

(2010). Trust and confidence in the courts: Does the quality of treatment young offenders receive affect their views of the courts? Crime & Delinquency, 56(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308176

41.

Tangney

J. P.

Baumeister

R. F.

Luzio-Boone

(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

42.

Tankebe

(2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x

43.

Tonry

Bijleveld

(2007). Crime, criminal justice, and criminology in the Netherlands. In Tonry

Bijleveld

(Eds.), Crime and justice in the Netherlands. Crime and justice: Review of research (pp. 1–30). University of Chicago Press.

44.

Trinkner

(2019). Clarifying the contours of the police legitimacy measurement debate: A response to Cao and Graham. Asian Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09300-4

45.

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In Tonry

(Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 431–505). University of Chicago Press.

46.

Tyler

T. R.

(2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

47.

Tyler

T. R.

Jackson

(2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In Tankebe

Liebling

A. E.

(Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford University Press.

48.

Tyler

T. R.

Lind

E. A.

(1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115–191). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X

49.

Van de Schoot

Lugtig

Hox

(2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740

50.

Van den Bos

Wilke

H. A. M.

Lind

E. A

. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449

51.

Walmsley

(2018). World prison population list (12th ed.). International Centre for Prison Studies.

52.

Walters

G. D.

Bolger

P. C.

(2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2

53.

Wartna

B. S. J.

Blom

Tollenaar

(2011). The Dutch recidivism monitor. Research and Documentation Centre.

54.

Wolfe

S. E.

Nix

Kaminski

Rojek

(2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB