Criminal thinking patterns—attitudes, beliefs, or values supportive of criminal behavior—represent modifiable clinical targets that can be influenced during treatment as a way of decreasing clients’ risk for recidivism. This study developed a revised measure of criminal thinking based on the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scales (TCU CTS). Using a sample of 797 people, results showed the revised instrument (TCU CTS 3.0) measured criminal thinking in five key areas: (1) Power Orientation, (2) Justification, (3) Insensitivity to Impact of Crime, (4) Grandiosity, and (5) Response Disinhibition. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 5-factor solution reasonably fit the data and measurement invariance was achieved for assigned sex at birth and race. Implications and future directions are discussed.
AdjorloloS.EgbenyaD. L. (2016). Executive functioning profiles of adult and juvenile male sexual offenders: A systematic review. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 27(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1141431
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
3.
AntonowiczD. H.RossR. R. (2005). Social problem-solving deficits in offenders. In McMurranM.McGuireJ. (Eds.), Social problem solving and offending: Evidence, evaluation, and evolution (pp. 91–102). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713488.ch5
4.
BestD.DayE.CampbellA.FlynnP. M.SimpsonD. D. (2009). Relationship between drug treatment engagement and criminal thinking style among drug-using offenders. European Addiction Research, 15(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1159/000189785
5.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
BourgonG.ArmstrongB. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270618
CalveteE. (2008). Justification of violence and grandiosity schemas as predictors of antisocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(7), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9229-5
10.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
11.
DemboR.TurnerC. W.JainchillN. (2007). An assessment of criminal thinking among incarcerated youths in three states. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(9), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807304348
12.
DeVonH. A.BlockM. E.Moyle-WrightP.ErnstD. M.HaydenS. J.LazzaraD. J.SavoyS. M.Kostas-PolstonE. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
13.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
FriendshipC.BludL.EriksonM.TraversR.ThorntonD. (2003). Cognitive-behavioural treatment for imprisoned offenders: An evaluation of HM Prison Service’s cognitive skills programmes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503762871273
16.
GuanM.LiaoY.RenH.WangX.YangQ.LiuX.WangW. (2015). Impaired response inhibition in juvenile delinquents with antisocial personality characteristics: A preliminary ERP study in a Go/Nogo task. Neuroscience Letters, 603, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.06.062
KrusemarkE. A.CampbellW. K.CroweM. L.MillerJ. D. (2018). Comparing self-report measures of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder in a male offender sample. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 984. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000579
19.
MandracchiaJ. T.MorganR. D. (2011). Understanding criminals’ thinking: Further examination of the measure of offender thinking styles–revised. Assessment, 18(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110377595
20.
MillsJ. F.KronerD. G.ForthA. E. (2002). Measures of criminal attitudes and associates (MCAA) development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment, 9(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102009003003
21.
MillsJ. F.KronerD. G.HemmatiT. (2004). The measures of criminal attitudes and associates (MCAA) the prediction of general and violent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(6), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804268755
22.
MitchellD.TafrateR. C. (2012). Conceptualization and measurement of criminal thinking: Initial validation of the Criminogenic Thinking Profile. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(7), 1080–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11416197
23.
MitchellD.TafrateR. C.HoganT.OlverM. E. (2013). An exploration of the association between criminal thinking and community program attrition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.09.003
24.
PincusA. L.CainN. M.WrightA. G. (2014). Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability in psychotherapy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000031
25.
PincusA. L.RocheM. J. (2011). Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. In CampbellK. W.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments, (pp. 31–40). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118093108.ch4
26.
PrateekshaS.RoopeshB. N.VijayasagarJ. K. (2014). Response inhibition in children with conduct disorder: A preliminary report. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(11), 1325–1330. https://tinyurl.com/44m8t59p
27.
RolffsJ. L.RoggeR. D.WilsonK. G. (2018). Disentangling components of flexibility via the hexaflex model: Development and validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 25(4), 458–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905
28.
RonningstamE. (2005). Identifying and understanding the narcissistic personality. Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/yeyhbapm
29.
SamejimaF. (2010). The general graded response model. In NeringM. L.OstiniR. (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 77–107). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
SimourdD. J. (1997). The criminal sentiments scale-modified and pride in delinquency scale: Psychometric properties and construct validity of two measures of criminal attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854897024001004
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
35.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.FurukawaE.KopelovichS.MeyerP. J.CosbyB. (2012). Reliability, validity, and predictive utility of the 25-item Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1340–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451092
36.
TaxmanF. S.Giuranna RhodesA.DumenciL. (2011). Construct and predictive validity of criminal thinking scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810389550
37.
VaterA.RitterK.Schröder-AbéM.SchützA.LammersC. H.BossonJ. K.RoepkeS. (2013). When grandiosity and vulnerability collide: Implicit and explicit self-esteem in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.001
38.
VedelagoL.AmlungM.MorrisV.PetkerT.BalodisI.McLachlanK.MamakM.MouldenH.ChaimowitzG.MacKillopJ. (2019). Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 37(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2420
WaltersG. D. (2002a). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles (PICTS): A review and meta-analysis. Assessment, 9(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102009003007
WaltersG. D. (2009). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles and psychopathy checklist: Screening version as incrementally valid predictors of recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 33(6), 497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9167-3
44.
WaltersG. D. (2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.010
45.
WeissB.MillerJ. D. (2018). Distinguishing between grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder. In HermannA. D.BrunellA. B.FosterJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 3–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_1
46.
YochelsonS.SamenowS. (1993). The criminal personality: A profile for change (Vol. 1). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. https://tinyurl.com/2p82mjfa
