Neighborhood Effects on Crime: The Concentration of Racial/Ethnic Groups and the Heterogeneity Among Such Groups

Abstract

It is not entirely clear what attribute of neighborhoods’ race/ethnicity affects crime rates over time. Drawing on a sample of block groups in Baltimore (MD) we therefore estimate negative binomial regression models to test the concentration of specific ethnic groups in neighborhoods (% Black, % White, % Latino, % Asian, and % other race) as well as the level of heterogeneity among these groups. The results show that ethnic heterogeneity is associated with higher rates of both violent and property crime years later, whereas the measures of nonwhite ethnic groups are not significant. We also determine that concentrated disadvantage moderates the effect of ethnic heterogeneity on property crime. The implications of these findings for criminology and urban sociology are discussed.

Keywords

neighborhood effects crime ethnic heterogeneity social disorganization urban sociology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. SAS Institute Inc.

Anderson

(1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. Norton.

Andresen

M. A.

(2020). Environmental criminology: Evolution, theory, and practice. Routledge.

Been

(1994). Siting of locally undesirable land uses: Directions for further research. Maryland Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 5, 105–114.

Boessen

Chamberlain

A. W.

(2017). Neighborhood crime, the housing crisis, and geographic space: Disentangling the consequences of foreclosure and vacancy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39, 1122–1137.

Boggess

L. N.

(2017). Disentangling the reciprocal relationship between change in crime and racial/ethnic change. Social Science Research, 68, 30–42.

Browning

C. R.

Byron

R. A.

Calder

C. A.

Krivo

L. J.

Kwan

M.-P.

Lee

J.-Y.

Peterson

R. D.

(2010). Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 329–357.

Bursik

R. J.

Grasmick

H. G.

(1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.

Caplan

J. M.

Kennedy

L. W.

Miller

(2011). Risk terrain modeling: Brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Quarterly, 28, 360–381.

10.

Chaskin

R. J.

Brown

Venkatesh

S. A.

Vidal

(2001). Building community capacity. Aldine de Gruyter.

11.

Clarke

R. V.

(1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.

12.

Clarke

R. V. G.

(1980). “Situational” crime prevention: Theory and practice. The British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.

13.

Corcoran

Zahnow

Wickes

Hipp

(2018). Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions. Urban Studies, 55, 2372–2390.

14.

Felson

Boba

(2010). Crime and everyday life. SAGE Publications, Inc.

15.

Gibbs

J. P.

Martin

W. T.

(1962). Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: International patterns. American Sociological Review, 27, 667–677.

16.

Hipp

J. R.

(2010). A dynamic view of neighborhoods: The reciprocal relationship between crime and neighborhood structural characteristics. Social Problems, 57, 205–230.

17.

Kim

Y.-A.

Hipp

J. R.

(2018). Physical boundaries and city boundaries: Consequences for crime patterns on street segments? Crime and Delinquency, 64, 227–254.

18.

Kim

Y.-A.

J. C.

(2021). Topography and crime in place: The effects of elevation, slope, and betweenness in San Francisco street segments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07352166.2021.1901591

19.

Krivo

L. J.

Peterson

R. D.

(1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75, 619–648.

20.

Kubrin

C. E.

Hipp

J. R.

(2016). Do fringe banks create fringe neighborhoods? Examining the spatial relationship between Fringe Banking and neighborhood crime rates. Justice Quarterly, 33, 755–784.

21.

Kubrin

C. E.

J. C.

(2015). Social disorganization theory’s greatest challenge: Linking structural characteristics to crime in socially disorganized communities. In Piquero

A. R.

(Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 121–136). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

22.

Logan

J. R.

Molotch

H. L.

(2007). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.

23.

Long

J. S.

Freese

(2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.

24.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

25.

Merry

S. E.

(1981). Urban danger: Life in a neighborhood of strangers. Temple University Press.

26.

Osgood

D. W.

(2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.

27.

Papachristos

A. V.

Smith

C. M.

Scherer

M. L.

Fugiero

M. A.

(2011). More coffee, less crime? The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City and Community, 10, 215–240.

28.

Peterson

R. D.

Krivo

L. J.

(2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell SAGE Foundation.

29.

Peterson

R. D.

Krivo

L. J.

Harris

M. A.

(2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 31–63.

30.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

(2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450.

31.

Pridemore

W. A.

Grubesic

T. H.

(2013). Alcohol outlets and community levels of interpersonal violence: Spatial density, outlet type, and seriousness of assault. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 132–159.

32.

Ramey

D. M.

Shrider

E. A.

(2014). New parochialism, sources of community investment, and the control of street crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 193–216.

33.

Rios

V. M.

(2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. NYU Press.

34.

Sampson

R. J.

(2012). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. The University of Chicago Press.

35.

Sampson

R. J.

Graif

(2009). Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization resident and leadership dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1579–1605.

36.

Sampson

R. J.

Groves

W. B.

(1989). Community Structure and crime: Testing Social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.

37.

Shaw

C. R.

McKay

H. D.

(1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.

38.

Slocum

L. A.

Rengifo

A. F.

Choi

Herrmann

C. R.

(2013). The elusive relationship between community organizations and Crime: An assessment across disadvantaged areas of the South Bronx. Criminology, 51, 167–216.

39.

Small

M. L.

(2006). Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor. Social Problems, 53, 274–292.

40.

Song

Andresen

M. A.

Brantingham

P. L.

Spicer

(2017). Crime on the edges: Patterns of crime and land use change. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44, 51–61.

41.

Squires

G. D.

Kubrin

C. E.

(2006). Privileged places: Race, residence, and the structure of opportunity. Rienner.

42.

Stucky

T. D.

Ottensmann

J. R.

(2009). Land use and violent crime. Criminology, 47, 1223–1264.

43.

Taylor

R. B.

Ratcliffe

J. H.

Perenzin

(2015). Can we predict long-term community crime problems? The estimation of ecological continuity to model risk heterogeneity. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 635–657.

44.

Vélez

M. B.

(2001). The role of public social control in urban neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of victimization risk. Criminology, 39, 837–864.

45.

Vélez

M. B.

Lyons

C. J.

(2014). Making or breaking neighborhoods: Public social control and the political economy of urban crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 225–235.

46.

Vélez

M. B.

Lyons

C. J.

Boursaw

(2012). Neighborhood housing investments and violent crime in Seattle, 1981-2007. Criminology, 50, 1025–1056.

47.

Warner

B. D.

Rountree

P. W.

(1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control. Social Problems, 44, 520–536.

48.

Warner

B. D.

Swartz

Hawk

S. R.

(2015). Racially homophilous social ties and informal social control. Criminology, 53, 204–230.

49.

Wilson

W. J.

(1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. The University of Chicago Press.

50.

J. C.

(2019). Mixed land use and neighborhood crime. Social Science Research, 78, 170–186.

51.

J. C.

Kim

Y.-A.

(2020a). A longitudinal examination of building demolitions on neighbourhood crime rates. The British Journal of Criminology, 61, 710–732.

52.

J. C.

Kim

Y.-A.

(2020b). Neighborhood effects on crime in San Francisco: An examination of residential, nonresidential, and “mixed” land uses. Deviant Behavior, 43, 61–78.

53.

Wooldredge

(2002). Examining the (Ir)Relevance of aggregation bias for multilevel studies of neighborhoods and crime with an example comparing census tracts to official neighborhoods in Cincinnati. Criminology, 40, 681–710.

54.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning.

55.

Zahnow

(2018). Mixed land use: Implications for violence and property crime. City and Community, 17, 1119–1142.