Research on the concentration and stability of crime patterns at micro-places primarily examines years as the temporal unit of observation. This study examines temporal patterns between months to explore the impact of the modifiable temporal unit problem (MTUP). We analyzed 26,555 violent crime incidents reported to the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department from a 60-month observation period and geocoded these incidents to 14,106 street segments. Street segments with crime experienced these incidents across a small number of months and there is much variability in which locations are hot spots between months. Only a small number of street segments experienced a seasonal pattern between months with most locations having complete instability or unpredictability in the months when crime does occur.
AndresenM. A. (2009). Testing for similarity in area-based spatial patterns: A nonparametric Monte Carlo approach. Applied Geography, 29, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.004
2.
AndresenM. A.CurmanA. S.LinningS. J. (2017). The trajectories of crime at places: Understanding the patterns of disaggregated crime types. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9301-1
AndresenM. A.LinningS. J.MallesonN. (2017). Crime at places and spatial concentrations: Exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver BC, 2003–2013. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9295-8
5.
AndresenM. A.MallesonN. (2011). Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810384136
6.
AshbyM. P. J.BowersK. J. (2013). A comparison of methods for temporal analysis of aoristic crime. Crime Science, 2, 1–16.
7.
BernascoW.SteenbeekW. (2017). More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9324-7
8.
BlockC. R. (1984). Is crime seasonal?Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
9.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2011). The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: A longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and Block faces in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810384137
10.
BragaA. A.PapachristosA. V.HureauD. M. (2010). The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9082-x
11.
BrantinghamP.BrantinghamP. (1995). Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26.
12.
CalińskiT.HarabaszJ. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361092740882710
13.
ChalfinA.KaplanJ.CuellarM. (2021). Measuring marginal crime concentration: A new solution to an old problem. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820984213
14.
ChengT.AdepejuM. (2014). Modifiable temporal unit problem (MTUP) and its effect on space-time cluster detection. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e100465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100465
ÇöltekinA.De SabbataS.WilliC.VontobeI.PfisterS.KuhnM.LacayoM. (2011). Modifiable temporal unit problem [Paper presentation]. ISPRS/ICA workshop “Persistent problems in geographic visualization” (ICC2011).
17.
CurmanA. S. N.AndresenM. A.BrantinghamP. J. (2015). Crime and place: A longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9228-3
18.
DorlingD.OpenshawS. (1992). Using computer animation to visualize space-time patterns. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 19, 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1068/b190639
19.
FarrellG.PeaseK. (1994). Crime Seasonality. The British Journal of Criminology, 34, 487–498.
20.
GenoliniC.AlacoqueX.SentenacM.ArnaudC. (2015). kml and kml3d: R packages to cluster longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Software, 65, 1–34.
GillC. E.WooditchA.WeisburdD. L. (2017). Testing the “law of crime concentration at place” in a suburban setting: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9304-y
23.
GorrW. L.LeeY. (2017). Chronic and temporary crime hot spots. In WeisburdD.EckJ. (Eds.), Connecting crime to place: New directions for theory and policy (pp. 41–63). Transaction Press.
24.
GorrW. L.LeeY. (2012). Longitudinal study of crime hot spots: Dynamics and impact on part 1 violent crime. Proceedings of the32nd international symposium on forecasting, Boston, 24–27.
25.
GriffithsE.ChavezJ. M. (2004). Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: Merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology, 42(4), 941–978.
26.
GroffE. R.RatcliffeJ. H.HabermanC. P.SorgE. T.JoyceN. M.TaylorR. B. (2015). Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia policing tactics experiment*. Criminology, 53, 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12055
27.
GroffE. R.WeisburdD. L.YangS-M. (2010). Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level? A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9081-y
28.
HabermanC. P.RatcliffeJ. H. (2012). The predictive policing challenges of near repeat armed street robberies. Policing, 6, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pas012
29.
HabermanC. P.RatcliffeJ. H. (2015). Testing for temporally differentiated relationships among potentially criminogenic places and census Block street robbery counts. Criminology, 53, 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12076
30.
HabermanC. P.SorgE. T.RatcliffeJ. H. (2017). Assessing the validity of the law of crime concentration across different temporal scales. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9327-4
31.
HattenD.PizaE. L. (2021). Measuring the temporal stability of near-repeat crime patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 67(4), 498–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720922545
32.
HigginsonA.MazerolleL. G. (2014). Legitimacy policing of places: The impact on crime and disorder. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9215-6
33.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2352-1_93
34.
HippJ. R.BoessenA. (2013). Egohoods as waves washing across the city: A new measure of “neighborhoods”. Criminology, 51(2), 287–327https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12006
35.
HippJ. R.KimY.-A. (2017). Measuring crime concentration across cities of varying sizes: Complications based on the spatial and temporal scale employed. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9328-3
36.
HopeT. (2015). The two criminologies of place: Problems of inference in understanding crime concentration [Conference session]. Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology, Porto.
37.
HuntJ. M. (2016). Do crime hot spots move? Exploring the effects of the modifiable areal unit problem and modifiable temporal unit problem on crim hot spot stability. American University.
38.
JelinskiD. E.WuJ. (1996). The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447512
39.
JohnsonS. D.BernascoW.BowersK. J.ElffersH.RatcliffeJ.RengertG.TownsleyM. (2007). Space–time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(3), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-007-9025-3
40.
LevinA.RosenfeldR.DeckardM. J. (2017). The law of crime concentration: An application and recommendations for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9332-7
41.
McDowallD.LoftinC.PateM. (2011). Seasonal cycles in crime, and their variability. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9145-7
42.
NaginD. S.KennethC. L.1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31(3), 327–362.
43.
OpenshawS. (1984). Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 16, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/a160017
44.
OpenshawS.TaylorP. J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients, three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In WrigleyN. (Ed.), Statistical applications in social sciences (pp. 127–144). Springer.
45.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2004). Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810310001596076
46.
Rinehart KochelT. (2010). Constructing hot spots policing: Unexamined consequences for disadvantaged populations and for police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403410376233
47.
RosenfeldR.DeckardM. J.BlackburnE. (2014). The effects of directed patrol and self-initiated enforcement on firearm violence: A randomized controlled study of hot spot policing. Criminology, 52, 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12043
48.
SchnellC.McManusH. D. (2020). The Influence of Temporal Specification on the Identification of Crime Hot Spots for Program Evaluations: A Test of Longitudinal Stability in Crime Patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1–24.
49.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–55.
50.
TelepC. W.MitchellR. J.WeisburdD. L. (2012). How much time should the police spend at crime hot spots? Answers from a police agency directed randomized field trial in Sacramento, California. Justice Quarterly, 31, 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.710645
51.
TompsonL.BowersK. (2013). A stab in the dark? A research note on temporal patterns of street robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812469114
WeisburdD. L. (2000). Randomized experiments in criminal justice policy: Prospects and problems. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 181–193.
54.
WeisburdD. L. (2005). Hot spots policing experiments and criminal justice research: Lessons from the field. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 599, 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205274597
WeisburdD. L.AmramS. (2014). The law of concentrations of crime at place: The case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Practice and Research, 15, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.874169
57.
WeisburdD. L.BushwayS.LumC.YangS-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00521.x
58.
WeisburdD. L.EckJ. E.BragaA. A.TelepC. W.CaveB.BowersK.BruinsmaG.GillC.GroffE. R.HibdonJ.HinkleJ. C.JohnsonS. D.LawtonB.LumC.RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG.TaniguchiT.YangS.-M. (2016). Place matters: Criminology for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.
59.
WeisburdD. L.GroffE. R.YangS.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press.
60.
WeisburdD. L.HinkleJ. C.FamegaC. N.ReadyJ. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9130-z
61.
WeisburdD. L.MastrofskiS. D.GreenspanR.WillisJ. J. (2004). The growth of compstat in american policing. U.S. Department of Justice.
62.
WeisburdD. L.MastrofskiS. D.McnallyA. M.GreenspanR.WillisJ. J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American Policing*. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00006.x
63.
WeisburdD. L.WyckoffL. A.ReadyJ.EckJ. E.HinkleJ. C.GajewskiF. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.
64.
WheelerA. P.WordenR. E.McLeanS. J. (2015). Replicating group-based trajectory models of crime at micro-places in Albany, NY. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9268-3
