The racial invariance thesis contends causes of offending are similar across race/ethnicity. Black Criminology perceives some tension with this claim, suggesting instead that Black people share a unique worldview due to the racial oppression they face. This worldview may make Black people more receptive to criminological explanations identifying race-specific pathways to committing crime. In the post-Civil Rights era, many white people explain social phenomena like crime in colorblind ways. This study used a random sample of Philadelphia area residents to explore whether Black people were less likely than white people to support the racial invariance thesis. Logistic regression analyses revealed the odds of Black Philadelphians agreeing with the racial invariance thesis were 85% higher than the odds for white Philadelphians.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
2.
AndersonC. (2020). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. Bloomsbury Publishing.
3.
AndersonE. (2015). The white space. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 10–21.
4.
BaumerE.MessnerS.RosenfeldR. (2003). Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 844–875.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2021). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
ButlerP. (1997). Affirmative action and the criminal law. University of Colorado Law Review, 68(4), 841–890.
7.
CampbellA.MuncerS. (1990). Causes of crime: Uncovering a lay model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(4), 410–419.
8.
CarllE. (2017). Disparate vantage points: Race, gender, county context, and attitudes about harsh punishments in the US. Social Science Research, 64, 137–153.
9.
CochranJ. K.BootsD. P.HeideK. M. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 65–93.
10.
CooperM. N.UpdegroveA. H.GabbidonS. L.JordanK. (2021). Pre-arrest perceptions of George Zimmerman’s guilt in the fatal Trayvon Martin shooting: Examining racial differences in the presumption of guilt. Crime and Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211022616
11.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331.
ErskineH. (1974). The polls: Causes of crime. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(2), 288–298.
15.
FalcoD. L.TurnerN. C. (2014). Examining causal attributions towards crime on support for offender rehabilitation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 630–641.
16.
FeaginJ. R. (2020). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
17.
FurnhamA.HendersonM. (1983). Lay theories of delinquency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 107–120.
18.
GabbidonS. L.BoisvertD. (2012). Public opinion on crime causation: An exploratory study of Philadelphia area residents. Criminal Justice Journal, 40, 50–59.
19.
GreenE. G. T.StaerkléC.SearsD. O. (2006). Symbolic racism and whites’ attitudes towards punitive and preventive crime policies. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 435–454.
20.
KrausM. W.OnyeadorI. N.DaumeyerN. M.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2019). The misperception of racial economic inequality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 899–921.
Lombroso-FerreroG. (1972). Criminal man (according to the classification of Cesare Lombroso). Patterson Smith Publishing.
23.
MearsD. P. (2001). Getting tough with juvenile offenders: Explaining support for sanctioning youths as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(2), 206–226.
24.
Onwuachi-WilligA. (2017). Policing the boundaries of whiteness: The tragedy of being “out of place” from Emmett till to Trayvon Martin. Iowa Law Review, 102(3), 1113–1185.
25.
OnwudiweI. D.LynchM. J. (2000). Reopening the debate: A reexamination of the need for a Black criminology. Social Pathology, 6(3), 182–198.
26.
OnyeadorI. N.DaumeyerN. M.RuckerJ. M.DukerA.KrausM. W.RichesonJ. A. (2021). Disrupting beliefs in racial progress: Reminders of persistent racism alter perceptions of past, but not current, racial economic equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 753–765.
ReutermanN. A. (1978). The public’s views of delinquency causation: A consideration in comprehensive juvenile justice planning. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 29(3), 39–45.
32.
RussellK. K. (1992). Development of a Black criminology and the role of the Black criminologist. Justice Quarterly, 9(4), 667–683.
33.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J.KatzH. (2018). Reassessing ‘toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality’. Du Bois Review, 15(1), 13–34.
34.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.
35.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1949). Rejoinder. The American Sociologist, 14, 614–617.
SimsB. (2003). The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review, 28(1), 1–25.
38.
SimsB.JohnstonE. (2004). Examining public opinion about crime and justice: A statewide study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 270–293.
39.
SmithJ. A.McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432–456.
TempletonL. J.HartnagelT. F. (2012). Causal attributions of crime and the public’s sentencing goals. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54(1), 45–65.
ThompsonV. R.BoboL. D. (2011). Thinking about crime: Race and lay accounts of lawbreaking behavior. Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Sciences, 634(1), 16–38.
44.
TochH.MaguireK. (2014). Public opinion regarding crime, criminal justice, and related topics: A retrospect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 424–444.
45.
UnneverJ. D.BarnesJ. C.CullenF. T. (2016). The racial invariance thesis revisited: Testing an African American theory of offending. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 7–26.
46.
UnneverJ. D.CochranJ. K.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K. (2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 431–457.
47.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.JonesJ. D. (2008). Public support for attacking the ‘root causes’ of crime: The impact of egalitarian and racial beliefs. Sociological Focus, 41(1), 1–33.
48.
UnneverJ. D.GabbidonS. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending: Race, racism, and crime. Routledge.
49.
UnneverJ. D.Owusu-BempahA. (2019). A Black criminology matters. In UnneverJ. D.GabbidonS. L.ChouhyC. (Eds.), Building a Black criminology: Race, theory, and crime (pp. 3–28). Routledge.
50.
UpdegroveA. H.BoisvertD. L.CooperM. N.GabbidonS. L. (2021). Criminological explanations, race, and biological attributions of crime as predictors of Philadelphia area residents’ support for criminal justice policies. Crime and Delinquency, 67(3), 319–343.
