The public rely on the police to enforce the law, and the police rely on the public to report crime and assist them with their enquiries. Police action or inaction can also impact on public willingness to informally intervene in community problems. In this paper we examine the formal-informal control nexus in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on a survey sample of 1,595 Australians during COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, we examine the relationship between police effectiveness, collective efficacy, and public willingness to intervene when others violate lockdown restrictions. We find that perceptions of police effectiveness in handling the COVID-19 crisis has a positive impact on the public’s willingness to intervene when others violate lockdown restrictions.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. Norton & Co.
2.
BennettR. R.WeigandR. B. (1994). Observations on crime reporting in a developing nation. Criminology, 32(1), 135–148.
3.
BlackD. (1984). Toward a general theory of social control. Academic Press Inc.
4.
BlackD. (1998). The social structure of right and wrong. Academic Press.
5.
BoatengF. D. (2018). Crime reporting behavior: Do attitudes toward the police matter?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(18), 2891–2916.
6.
BrowningC. R.CagneyK. A. (2002). Neighborhood structural disadvantage, collective efficacy, and self-rated physical health in an urban setting. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 43(4), 383–399.
7.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.
DrakulichK. M.CrutchfieldR. D. (2013). The role of perceptions of the police in informal social control: Implications for the racial stratification of crime and control. Social Problems, 60(3), 383–407.
FergusonK. M.MindelC. H. (2007). Modelling fear of crime in Dallas neighborhoods: A test of social capital theory. Crime & Delinquency, 53(2), 322–349.
12.
FishmanG. (1979). Patterns of victimization and notification. British Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 146–157.
13.
FranziniL.CaughyM.SpearsW.EsquerM. E. F. (2005). Neighborhood economic conditions, social processes and self-rated health in low-income neighborhoods in Texas: A multilevel latent variables model. Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1135–1150.
14.
GoudriaanH.WittebroodK.NieuwbeertaP. (2006). Neighbourhood characteristics and reporting crime: Effects of social cohesion, confidence in police effectiveness and socio-economic disadvantage. British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 719–742.
15.
KochelT. R. (2012). Can police legitimacy promote collective efficacy? Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 384–419.
16.
KochelT. R. (2018). Applying police legitimacy, cooperation, and collective security hypotheses to explain collective efficacy and violence across neighbourhoods. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(4), 253–272.
17.
KochelT.GauJ. M. (2019). Examining police presence, tactics, and engagement as facilitators of informal social control in high-crime areas. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1632917
18.
KornhauserR. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. University of Chicago Press.
19.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402.
20.
MazerolleL. M.WickesR.McBroomJ. (2010) Community variations in violence: The role of social ties and collective efficacy in comparative context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(1), 3–30.
21.
MurphyK.HindsL.FlemingJ. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing & Society, 18(2), 136–155.
22.
McCarthyM.MurphyK.SargeantE.WilliamsonH. (In press). Policing COVID-19 physical distancing measures: Managing defiance and fostering compliance among individuals least likely to comply. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1869235>
23.
MurphyK.WiliamsonH.SargeantE.McCarthyM. (2020a). The attitudes to authority during COVID-19 survey technical report. Criminology Research Institute, Griffith University.
24.
MurphyK.WilliamsonH.SargeantE.McCarthyM. (2020b). Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: Self-interest or duty?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 477–496.
25.
OdgersC. L.MoffittT.TachL. M.SampsonR. J.TaylorA.MatthewsC. L.CapsiA. (2009). The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on British children growing up in deprivation: A developmental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 942–957.
26.
PickettJ. T.NixJ.RocheS. P. (2018). Testing a social schematic model of police procedural justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(2), 97–125.
27.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. The University of Chicago Press.
28.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
29.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5329), 918–924.
30.
SampsonR. J.WikstromP. O. (2008). The social order of violence in Chicago and Stockholm neighborhoods: A comparative inquiry. In ShapiroI.KalyvasS. N.MasoudT. (Eds.), Order, conflict, and violence (pp. 97–119). Cambridge University Press.
31.
SargeantE. (2017). Policing and collective efficacy: The relative importance of police effectiveness, procedural justice and the obligation to obey police. Policing & Society, 27(8), 927–940.
32.
SargeantE.WickesR.MazerolleL. (2013). Policing community problems: Exploring the role of formal social control in shaping collective efficacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 70–87.
33.
SargeantE.WickesR.MurphyK.MazerolleL. (2018). Surrounded by violence: How do individual perceptions and community context shape views about violence?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 355–371.
34.
ShawC.McKayH. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.
35.
SilverE.MillerL. L. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighbourhoods. Criminology, 42(3), 551–583.
36.
SunI. Y.TriplettR. A.GaineyR. R. (2004). Social organization, legitimacy of local institutions and neighborhood crime: An exploratory study of perceptions of the police and local government. Journal of Crime and Justice, 27(1), 33–60.
37.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
38.
TylerT. R.FaganJ. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–276.
39.
WarnerB. D. (2007). Directly intervene or call the authorities? A study of forms of neighborhood social control within a social disorganization framework. Criminology, 45(1), 99–129.
40.
WarnerB. D.BurchfieldK. (2011). Misperceived neighborhood values and informal social control. Justice Quarterly, 28(4), 606–630.
41.
WatkinsA. M. (2005). Examining the disparity between juvenile and adult victims in notifying the police: A study of mediating variables. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(3), 333–353.
42.
WickesR.HippJ.SargeantE.MazerolleL. (2017). Neighbourhood social ties and shared expectations for informal social control: Do they influence informal social control actions?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 101–129.
