The Sexual Stratification Hypothesis and Prosecuting Sexual Assault: Is the Decision to File Charges Influenced by the Victim-Suspect Racial-Ethnic Dyad?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2021
The Sexual Stratification Hypothesis and Prosecuting Sexual Assault: Is the Decision to File Charges Influenced by the Victim-Suspect Racial-Ethnic Dyad?
The sexual stratification hypothesis (SSH) posits that criminal-legal responses to sexual victimization differ depending on the victim-suspect racial-ethnic dyad. Existing tests of the SSH have resulted in inconsistent findings. Using data from 389 sexual assault (SA) complaints reported to Los Angeles police and referred to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, this study examines whether the victim-suspect racial-ethnic dyad and extra-legal victim-related factors shape prosecutorial initial filing decisions. Notably, we build on previous SSH tests by rotating racial-ethnic dyad reference categories to catalog all possible pairwise differences within the set of dummy variables. Findings suggest that prosecutors consider the victim-suspect racial-ethnic dyad and victim-related factors during initial filing. Theoretical advancements, practical implications, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
AlbonettiC. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291–313.
2.
AlderdenM. A.UllmanS. E. (2012). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 18(5), 525–551.
3.
BachmanR. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(1), 8–29.
4.
BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(4), 461–498.
5.
BouffardJ. A. (2000). Predicting type of sexual assault case closure from victim, suspect, and case characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(6), 527–542.
6.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Fawcett Columbine.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140(1), 139–167.
9.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241.
10.
EstrichS. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.
11.
FrazierP. A.HaneyB. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20(6), 607–628.
12.
FrohmannL. (1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–226.
13.
FrohmannL. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. Law & Society Review, 31(3), 531–556.
14.
HarrisA. P. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 581–616.
15.
HawkinsD. F. (1986). Race, crime type and imprisonment. Justice Quarterly, 3(3), 251–269.
16.
HenryT. K. S.JurekA. L. (2020). Identification, corroboration, and charging: Examining the use of DNA evidence by prosecutors in sexual assault cases. Feminist Criminology, 15(5), 634–658.
17.
HolleranD.BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2010). Examining charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases. Crime & Delinquency, 56(3), 385–413.
18.
HorneyJ.SpohnC. (1996). The influence of blame and believability factors on the processing of simple versus aggravated rape cases. Criminology, 34(2), 135–162.
19.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (1980). Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 9(10), 1043–1069.
20.
KennedyR. (1997). How are we doing with loving: Race, law, and intermarriage. Boston University Law Review, 77(4), 815–824.
21.
KennedyR. (2001). Racial trends in the administration of criminal justice. In SmelserN.WilsonW.MitchellF. (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). National Academy Press.
22.
KerstetterW. A. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 81, 267.
23.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C.WentworthJ. (1999). Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Quarterly, 16(2), 275–302.
24.
LaFreeG. (1989). Rape and criminal justice. Wadsworth.
25.
LaFreeG. D. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45(5), 842–854.
26.
La MorteW. W., (2016, June16). Confidence intervals and p-values. Boston University School of Public Health.
27.
La MorteW. W.MenzoianJ. O. (1997). Abdominal wall hernias with abdominal aortic aneurysmal versus aortoiliac occlusive disease. The American Journal of Surgery, 173(5), 457–457.
28.
MeekerK. A.O’NealE. N.HayesB. E. (2019). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: An examination of arrest and initial filing decisions in cases involving adolescent complainants. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1679863
29.
MillerL. L. (2008). The perils of federalism: Race, poverty, and the politics of crime control. Oxford University Press.
30.
MorabitoM. S.PattavinaA.WilliamsL. M. (2019). It all just piles up: Challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processing. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15), 3151–3170.
31.
O’NealE. N. (2017). Victim cooperation in intimate partner sexual assault cases: A mixed methods examination. Justice Quarterly, 34(6), 1014–1043.
32.
O’NealE. N. (2019). “Victim is not credible”: The influence of rape culture on police perceptions of sexual assault complainants. Justice Quarterly, 36(1), 127–160.
33.
O’NealE. N.BeckmanL. O.SpohnC. (2019). The sexual stratification hypothesis: Is the decision to arrest influenced by the victim/suspect racial/ethnic dyad?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(6), 1287–1310.
34.
O’NealE. N.HayesB. E. (2020). “Most [false reports] involve teens”: Officer attitudes toward teenage sexual assault complainants—A qualitative analysis. Violence Against Women, 26(1), 24–45.
35.
O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women, 23(6), 707–729.
36.
O’NealE. N.TellisK.SpohnC. (2015). Prosecuting intimate partner sexual assault: Legal and extra-legal factors that influence charging decisions. Violence Against Women, 21(10), 1237–1258.
37.
PattonT. O.Snyder-YulyJ. (2007). Any four black men will do: Rape, race, and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37(6), 859–895.
38.
PiperA. (1992). Passing for white, passing for black. Transition, 58, 4–32.
39.
PokorakJ. J. (2006). Rape as a badge of slavery: The legal history of, and remedies for, prosecutorial race-of-victim charging disparities. Nevada Law Journal, 7, 54.
40.
SauroJ.LewisJ. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Elsevier.
41.
SpohnC. (2020). Sexual assault case processing: The more things change, the more they stay the same. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy; Brisbane, 9(1), 86–94.
42.
SpohnC.BeichnerD.Davis-FrenzelE. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice”. Social Problems, 48(2), 206–235.
43.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 651–688.
44.
SpohnC.HorneyJ. (1993). Rape law reform and the effect of victim characteristics on case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(4), 383–409.
45.
SpohnC.SpearsJ. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 649–679.
46.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault in Los Angeles City and County: A collaborative study in partnership with the Los Angeles police department, the Los Angeles County sheriff’s department, and the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office (NIJ 2009-WG-BX-009). National Institute of Justice (US).
47.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2014). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Lynne Rienner.
48.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2019). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly, 36(3), 383–411.
49.
SteikerC. S.SteikerJ. M. (2010). Capital punishment: A century of discontinuous debate. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100, 643.
50.
TellisK. M.SpohnC. C. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(3), 252–261.
51.
UnterhalterB. (1975). Changing attitudes to ‘passing for white’ in an urban coloured community. Social Dynamics, 1(1), 53–62.
52.
WalshA. (1987). The sexual stratification hypothesis and sexual assault in light of the changing conceptions of race. Criminology, 25(1), 153–174.
