We examine the narratives of parents and stepparents who used methamphetamine to uncover how they talk about parenting decisions relating to their children using drugs. We find that parents draw on themes of protecting children from harm to justify their decisions and to frame themselves as responsible parents. Whereas most said that they would not use with their children, those who did justified their choices by saying they were protecting their children. Regardless of whether they used with their children or not, parents narratively framed their decisions in ways that they believed reflected parenting beliefs common in their social setting. Our findings suggest that one’s ability to frame parenting decisions in culturally accepted practices can facilitate intergenerational drug use.
BachmanR.KerrisonE. M.PaternosterR.SmithL.O’ConnellD. (2016). The complex relationship between motherhood and desistance. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(3), 212–231.
2.
BaileyJ. A.HillK. G.OesterleS.HawkinsJ. D. (2009). Parenting practices and problem behavior across three generations: Monitoring, harsh discipline, and drug use in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1214–1226.
3.
BakerP. L.CarsonA. (1999). “I take care of my kids” mothering practices of substance-abusing women. Gender & Society, 13(3), 347–363.
4.
BenoitC.MagnusS. (2017). “Depends on the father” defining problematic paternal substance use during pregnancy and early parenthood. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 42(4), 379–402.
5.
CooleyC. H. (1992). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
6.
CopesH. (2016). A narrative approach to studying symbolic boundaries among drug users: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 193–213.
7.
CopesH.HochstetlerA.RaglandJ. (2019). The stories in pictures: The value of the visual for narrative criminology. In FleetwoodJ.PresserL.SandbergS.UgelvikT. (Eds.), Emerald handbook of narrative criminology (pp. 175–196). Emerald Publishing.
8.
CopesH.HochstetlerA.WilliamsJ. P. (2008). “We weren’t like no regular dope fiends”: Negotiating hustler and crackhead identities. Social Problems, 55(2), 254–270.
9.
CopesH.LebanL.KerleyK. R.DeitzerJ. R. (2016). Identities, boundaries, and accounts of women methamphetamine users. Justice Quarterly, 33(1), 134–158.
10.
CopesH.LebanL.RaglandJ. (2021). Changing narratives of intimate partner violence: A longitudinal photo-ethnography. Conflict and Society.
11.
DiMaggioP. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.
12.
DunlapE.StürzenhofeckerG.SanabriaH.JohnsonB. D. (2004). Mothers and daughters: The intergenerational reproduction of violence and drug use in home and street life. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 3(2), 1–23.
13.
EllingsæterA. L.JensenA. M.LieM. (Eds.). (2013). The social meaning of children and fertility change in Europe. Routledge.
14.
GreenR.MooreD. (2013). “Meth circles” and “pipe pirates”: Crystal methamphetamine smoking and identity management among a social network of young adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 48, 691–701.
15.
GrundetjernH. (2018). Negotiating motherhood: Variations of maternal identities among women in the illegal drug economy. Gender & Society, 32(3), 395–416.
16.
GrundetjernH.CopesH.SandbergS. (2021). Dealing with fatherhood: Paternal identities among men in the illegal drug economy. European Journal of Criminology, 18, 643–659.
17.
HardestyM.BlackT. (1999). Mothering through addiction: A survival strategy among Puerto Rican addicts. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 602–619.
18.
HoganD. M. (2007). The impact of opiate dependence on parenting processes: Contextual, physiological and psychological factors. Addiction Research & Theory, 15(6), 617–635.
19.
KleeH. (1998). Drug-using parents: Analysing the stereotypes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 9(6), 437–448.
20.
LamontM.FournierM. (1992). Introduction. In LamontM.FournierM. (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 1–17). University of Chicago Press.
21.
LamontM.MolnárV. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.
22.
LinnemannT.WallT. (2013). “This is your face on meth”: The punitive spectacle of “white trash” in the rural war on drugs. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 315–334.
23.
LosekeD. R. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. Sociological Quarterly, 48(4), 661–688.
24.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good. American Psychological Association.
25.
McAdamsD. P.McLeanK. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238.
26.
McKeganeyN.BarnardM.McIntoshJ. (2002). Paying the price for their parents’ addiction: Meeting the needs of the children of drug-using parents. Drugs Education Prevention and Policy, 9(3), 233–246.
27.
PleckJ. H. (1998). American fathering in historical perspective. In HansenK. V.GareyA. I. (Eds.), Families in the US: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 351–361). Temple University Press.
28.
PresserL.SandbergS. (Eds.). (2015). Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (Vol. 17). NYU Press.
29.
RhodesT.BernaysS.HoumollerK. (2010). Parents who use drugs: Accounting for damage and its limitation. Social Science & Medicine, 71(8), 1489–1497.
30.
SempleS. J.StrathdeeS. A.ZiansJ.PattersonT. L. (2011). Methamphetamine-using parents: The relationship between parental role strain and depressive symptoms. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(6), 954–964.
31.
SkeggsB. (1997). Formations of class & gender: Becoming respectable. SAGE.
32.
WilkinsonD. L.MagoraA.GarciaM.KhuranaA. (2009). Fathering at the margins of society: Reflections from young, minority, crime-involved fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 30(7), 945–967.
33.
XuX.TungY. Y.DunawayR. G. (2000). Cultural, human, and social capital as determinants of corporal punishment: Toward an integrated theoretical model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(6), 603–630.
34.
ZerubavelE. (1996). Lumping and splitting: Notes on social classification. Sociological Forum, 11, 421–433.
