The “gender gap” in offending is largest for violent crime types, and many theoretical perspectives have attempted to account for this gap. The current study provides unique insight into these issues by using a sample of men and women in prison to examine and explain intentions to be aggressive in response to a hypothetical scenario. Results show that similar factors (e.g., low self-control, prior aggression) predict aggressive responses to a hypothetical scenario for both men and women, but some evidence also emerged that different factors account for men’s and women’s behavior (e.g., education, family attachment).
ArcherJ. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.
2.
ArcherJ.Fernández-FuertesA. A.ThanzamiV. L. (2010). Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in two forms of aggression?Aggressive Behavior, 36, 292–304.
3.
ArcherJ.MehdikhaniM. (2003). Variability among males in sexually selected attributes. Review of General Psychology, 7, 219–236.
4.
BennettS.FarringtonD. P.HuesmanL. R. (2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(3), 263–288.
5.
BergM. T.FelsonR. (2020). A social interactionist approach to the victim-offender overlap. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 153–181.
6.
BettencourtB. A.MillerN. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 422–447.
7.
BouffardJ. A.PetkovsekM. A. (2014). Testing Hirschi’s integration of social control and rational choice: Are bonds considered in offender decisions?Journal of Crime and Justice, 37, 285–308.
8.
CampbellA. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 237–264.
9.
DalyK. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. Yale University Press.
10.
DalyK.Chesney-LindM. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497–538.
11.
El SayedS. A.PiqueroA. R.TenEyckM. (2017). Differentiating between Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy and Silverthorn and Frick’s delayed-onset models of female offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 631–650.
12.
FelsonR. B. (1993). Predatory and dispute-related violence: A social interactionist approach. In ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 103–125). Transaction.
13.
FitzgeraldR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. R.AnsaraD. L. (2012). Exploring sex differences among sentenced juvenile offenders in Australia. Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 420–447.
14.
GiordanoP. C.CoppJ. E. (2019). Girls’ and women’s violence: The question of general versus uniquely gendered causes. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 167–189.
15.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.
16.
GriffithsE.YuleC.GartnerR. (2011). Fighting over trivial things: Explaining the issue of contention in violent altercations. Criminology, 49(1), 61–94.
17.
HaynieD. L.DooganN. J.SollerB. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology, 52(4), 688–722.
18.
HaynieD. L.SteffensmeierD.BellK. E. (2007). Gender and serious violence: Untangling the role of friendship sex composition and peer violence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(3), 235–253.
19.
HeimerK.CosterS. D. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37(2), 277–318.
20.
JoosenK. J.PalmenH.KruttschnittC.BijleveldC.DirkzwagerA.NieuwbeertaP. (2016). How “gendered” are gendered pathways into prison?: A latent class analysis of the life experiences of male and female prisoners in the Netherlands. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2, 321–340.
21.
KruttschnittC. (2013). Gender and crime. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 291–308.
22.
LetendreJ. (2007). “Sugar and spice but not always nice”: Gender socialization and its impact on development and maintenance of aggression in adolescent girls. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(4), 353–368.
23.
LongshoreD.ChangE.HsiehS. C.MessinaN. (2004). Self-control and social bonds: A combined control perspective on deviance. Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 542–564.
24.
MarcosA. C.BahrS. J.JohnsonR. E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Social Forces, 65(1), 135–161.
25.
MasseyJ. L.KrohnM. D. (1986). A logitudinal examination of an integrated social process model of deviant behavior. Social Forces, 65(1), 106–134.
PiqueroA. R.BouffardJ. A.PiqueroN. L.CraigJ. (2016). Does morality condition the deterrent effect of perceived certainty among convicted felons?Crime and Delinquency, 62, 3–25.
28.
PiqueroA. R.BrameR.MoffittT. E. (2005). Extending the study of continuity and change: Gender differences in the linkage between adolescent and adult offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(2), 219–243.
29.
SullivanC. J.McGloinJ. M.RayJ. V.CaudyM. S. (2009). Detecting specialization in offending: Comparing analytic approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 419–441.
