Digital communication poses challenges for scholars interested in the link between peers and crime since youth are often less inhibited online and can more easily share their opinions and experiences with offline activities. Drawing on longitudinal data from middle and high school students, this study explores how online communication impacts the sharing of personal and peer delinquency. Criminogenic risk factors are largely unrelated to the digital disclosure of personal delinquency among those who offend; however, peer online disclosure is related to self-reported delinquency, independent of perceived peer delinquency. These findings suggest cyberspace may extend offline mechanisms of peer influence beyond providing a unique source of online influence.
AikenM. (2016). The cyber effect: A pioneering cyberpsychologist explains how human behavior changes online. Spiegel & Grau.
2.
AkersR. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Transaction Publishers.
3.
Amichai-HamburgerY.KingsburyM.SchneiderB. H. (2013). Friendship: An old concept with a new meaning?Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 33–39.
4.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
5.
BonettiL.CampbellM. A.GilmoreL. (2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with Children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 279–285.
6.
BrakeD. R. (2014). Sharing our lives online: Risks and exposure in social media. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BuhrmesterD.PragerK. (1995). Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In RotenbergK. J. (Ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 10–56). Cambridge University Press.
8.
BurgessR. L.AkersR. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147.
9.
CalvertS. L. (2002). Identity construction on the internet. In CalvertS. L.JordanA. B.CockingR. R. (Eds.), Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 57–70). Praeger.
10.
CumingS.RapeeR. M. (2010). Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(2), 87–96.
11.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. SAGE Publications, Inc.
12.
ElliottD. S.HuizingaD.AgetonS. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. SAGE Publications.
13.
ElliottD. S.MenardS. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). Cambridge University Press.
14.
EsbensenF. A.PetersonD.TaylorT.FrengA.(2010). Youth violence: Sex and race differences in offending, victimization, and gang membership. Temple University Press.
15.
GallupeO.McLeveyJ.BrownS. (2019). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313–335.
16.
GlueckS.GlueckE. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Harvard University Press.
17.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday and Co.
18.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
19.
GottfredsonG. D.GottfredsonD. C.PayneA. A.GottfredsonN. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 412–444.
20.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
21.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.
22.
HallinanM. T. (1978). The process of friendship formation. Social Networks, 1(2), 193–210.
23.
HayneS. C.RiceR. E. (1997). Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(3), 429–452.
24.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130.
25.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
26.
HowellJ. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. SAGE.
27.
HuangG. C.UngerJ. B.SotoD.FujimotoK.PentzM. A.Jordan-MarshM.ValenteT. W. (2014). Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), 508–514.
28.
JanssenH. J.EichelsheimV. I.DekovićM.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2016). How is parenting related to adolescent delinquency? A between- and within-person analysis of the mediating role of self-control, delinquent attitudes, peer delinquency, and time spent in criminogenic settings. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 169–194.
29.
JoinsonA. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192.
30.
KleinM. W. (1971). Street gangs and street workers. Prentice-Hall.
31.
LaneJ. (2019). The digital street. Oxford University Press.
32.
LenhartA. (2015). Teens, social media, and technology overview. PEW Research Center.
33.
MatsuedaR. L.AndersonK. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36(2), 269–308.
34.
McCuddyT. (2021). Peer delinquency among digital natives: The cyber context as a source of peer influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 306–342.
35.
McCuddyT.EsbensenF. A. (2020). The role of online communication among gang and non-gang youth. In MeldeC.WeermanF. (Eds.), Gangs in the era of internet and social media (pp. 81–104). Springer International Publishing.
36.
McCuddyT.VogelM. (2015). More than just friends: Online social networks and offending. Criminal Justice Review, 40(2), 169–189.
37.
McGloinJ. M.ThomasK. J. (2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 241–264.
38.
McKennaK. Y. A.GreenA. S.GleasonM. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31.
39.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
40.
MeldeC.WeermanF. (2020). Gangs in the Era of Internet and social media. Springer International Publishing.
41.
MeschG. S.TalmudI. (2006). Online friendship formation, communication channels, and social closeness. International Journal of Internet Science, 1(1), 29–44.
42.
MillerB.MorrisR. G. (2016). Virtual peer effects in social learning theory. Crime and Delinquency, 62(12), 1543–1569.
43.
MouleR. K.DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (2017). Technology and conflict: Group processes and collective violence in the Internet era. Crime Law and Social Change, 68(1–2), 47–73.
44.
MouleR. K.PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (2014). Internet adoption and online behaviour among American street gangs: Integrating gangs and organizational theory. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1186–1206.
45.
PattonD. U.PyroozD.DeckerS.FreyW. R.LeonardP. (2019). When twitter fingers turn to trigger fingers: A qualitative study of social media-related gang violence. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(3), 205–217.
46.
PedersenD. M. (1997). Psychological functions of privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 147–156.
47.
PennebakerJ. W.HughesC. F.O’HeeronR. C. (1987). The psychophysiology of confession: Linking inhibitory and psychosomatic processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 781–793.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.Thomas WinfreeL.MadensenT. D.DaigleL. E.FearnN. E.GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802.
50.
QuarantielloL. E. (1997). Cyber crime: How to protect yourself from computer criminals. Limelight Books.
51.
RosenbergM.SchoolerC.SchoenbachC. (1989). Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 54(6), 1004–1018.
52.
RubinZ. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233–260.
53.
Savin-WilliamsR. C.BerndtT. J. (1990). Friendship and peer relations. In FeldmanS. S.ElliotG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 292–315). Harvard University Press.
54.
SchoutenA. P.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” model. Media Psychology, 10(2), 292–315.
55.
ShawL. H.GantL. M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157–171.
56.
SkuesJ. L.WilliamsB.WiseL. (2012). The effects of personality traits, self-esteem, loneliness, and narcissism on Facebook use among university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2414–2419.
57.
SparrevohnR. M.RapeeR. M. (2009). Self-disclosure, emotional expression and intimacy within romantic relationships of people with social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(12), 1074–1078.
58.
StattinH.KerrM. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072–1085.
59.
StrykerS.BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
60.
StuartF. (2020). Code of the tweet: Urban gang violence in the social media age. Social Problems, 67(2), 191–207.
61.
SubrahmanyamK.ŠmahelD. (2010). Digital youth: The role of media in development. Springer Science & Business Media.
SulerJ. (2016). Psychology of the digital age: Humans become electric. Cambridge University Press.
64.
SutherlandE. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.
65.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
66.
ThrasherF. (1927). The gang: A study of one thousand three hundred thirteen groups in Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
67.
TidwellL. C.WaltherJ. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
68.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1182.
69.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 79–97.
70.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127.
71.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press.
72.
WeermanF. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49(1), 253–286.
73.
YoungJ. T. N.RebellonC. J.BarnesJ. C.WeermanF. M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
