Studies show that residents from urban, high-risk neighborhoods fair worse on multiple behavioral and health outcomes than their counterparts from more socially and economically advantaged neighborhoods. However, few research efforts have been devoted to examining how formerly incarcerated individuals’ concerns over neighborhood environment are associated with reentry outcomes. Using longitudinal data that captured the reentry experiences of individuals released from prison, the present study quantifies how returning citizens’ concerns over neighborhood environment predict their social withdrawal and mental health deterioration. Findings suggest that when respondents’ post-release family bonds, financial difficulty, drug use, and past mental health histories are all taken into account, their concerns over neighborhood environment exert a significant and positive effect on social withdrawal, depression, and hostility. Returning citizens who believe it is hard to stay out of trouble and prison in their neighborhoods tend to avoid social interactions with others and experience depression and increased hostility and vigilance. Implications for reentry programing and interventions are discussed.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W. W. Norton and Company.
2.
BergM. T.HuebnerB. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410.
3.
BomanJ. H.IVMowenT. J. (2017). Building the ties that bind, breaking the ties that Don’t: Family support, criminal peers, and reentry success. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 753–774.
4.
BurdetteH. L.WaddenT. A.WhitakerR. C. (2006). Neighborhood safety, collective efficacy, and obesity in women with young children. Obesity, 14(3), 518–525.
5.
CohenD. A.MasonK.BedimoA.ScribnerR.BasoloV.FarleyT. A. (2003). Neighborhood physical conditions and health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 467–471.
6.
CrawfordA. M.ManassisK. (2011). Anxiety, social skills, friendship quality, and peer victimization: An integrated model. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(7), 924–931.
7.
DemeterL. A.SibandaN. (2017). Neighborhood risks and resources correlated with successful reentry of youth returning from Massachusetts detention centers. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 15.
8.
DerogatisL. R. (1977). SCL-90. Administration, scoring and procedures manual-i for the revised version. John Hopkins University School of Medicine.
9.
DiasJ. J.WhitakerR. C. (2013). Black mothers’ perceptions about urban neighborhood safety and outdoor play for their preadolescent daughters. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(1), 206–219.
10.
FaderJ. J. (2021). “I don’t have time for drama”: Managing risk and uncertainty through network avoidance. Criminology, 59, 291–317.
11.
FisherA. A.HattonD. C. (2010). A study of women prisoners’ use of co-payments for health care: Issues of access. Women’s Health Issues, 20(3), 185–192.
12.
GauJ. M.BrunsonR. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279.
13.
Hadley-IvesE.StiffmanA. R.ElzeD.JohnsonS. D.DoreP. (2000). Measuring neighborhood and school environments perceptual and aggregate approaches. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 3, 1–28.
14.
HaldipurJ. (2018). No place on the corner. New York University Press.
15.
HardingD. J. (2010). Living the drama: Community, conflict, and culture among inner-city boys. University of Chicago Press.
16.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ.WyseJ. (2019). On the outside, prisoner reentry and reintegration. University of Chicago Press.
17.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D.HerbertC. W. (2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647, 214–236.
18.
HerbertC. W.MorenoffJ. D.HardingD. J. (2015). Homelessness and housing insecurity among former prisoners. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1, 44–79.
19.
HippJ. R.YatesD. K. (2009). Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology, 47, 619–656.
20.
HochstetlerA.DeLisiM.Jones-JohnsonG.JohnsonW. R. (2014). The criminal victimization–depression sequela: Examining the effects of violent victimization on depression with a longitudinal propensity score design. Crime and Delinquency, 60(5), 785–806.
21.
KramerR.RemsterB. (2018). Stop, frisk, and assault? Racial disparities in police use of force during investigatory stops. Law & Society Review, 52(4), 960–993.
22.
KubrinC. E.StewartE. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165–197.
23.
LatkinC. A.CurryA. D. (2003). Stressful neighborhoods and depression: A prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 34–44.
24.
LattimoreP. K.SteffeyD. M. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Methodology and analytic approach. RTI International.
25.
LattimoreP. K.VisherC. A. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis. Urban Institute.
26.
LiuL. (2020). Family, parochial, and public levels of social control and recidivism: An extension of the systemic model of social disorganization. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 864–886.
27.
LiuL.BachmanR. (2021). Self-identity and persistent offending: A quantitative test of identity theory of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(5), 1–17.
28.
LiuL.VisherC. A.SunD. (2020). Do released prisoners’ perceptions of neighborhood condition affect reentry outcomes?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 0887403420980806.
29.
LiuL.VisherC. A. (2021a). Decomposition of the role of family in reentry: Family support, tension, gender, and reentry outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 67(6–7), 970–996.
30.
LiuL.VisherC. A. (2021b). The roles of family, community, and services in the prevention of illicit drug use: Findings from a sample of released prisoners. Journal of Drug Issues, 51(2), 358–375.
31.
LiuL.VisherC. A.O’ConnellD. J. (2021). Strain during reentry: A test of general strain theory using a sample of adult former prisoners. The Prison Journal, 101(4), 420–442.
32.
MaruschakL. M.MintonT. D. (2020). Correctional populations in the United States, 2017-2018: Prepared by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (Report no. NCJ252157), U.S. Department of Justice.
33.
MassogliaM.FirebaughG.WarnerC. (2013). Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 142–165.
34.
MathurS. R.ClarkH. G. (2014). Community engagement for reentry success of youth from juvenile justice: Challenges and opportunities. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 713–734.
35.
MearsD. P.WangX.HayC.BalesW. D. (2008). Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology, 46(2), 301–340.
MowenT. J.BomanJ. H. (2018). A developmental perspective on reentry: Understanding the causes and consequences of family conflict and peer delinquency during adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 275–289.
38.
MowenT. J.StansfieldR.BomanJ. H.IV. (2019). Family matters: Moving beyond “if” family support matters to “why” family support matters during reentry from prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(4), 483–523.
39.
O’ConnellD.VisherC.LiuL. (2019). Violent offending, desistance, and recidivism. Marquette Law Review, 103, 983.
40.
PoortingaW. (2006). Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 255–270.
41.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
42.
RobbinsC. A.MartinS. S.SurrattH. L. (2009). Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime & Delinquency, 55(3), 388–411.
43.
RossC. E. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 177–187.
44.
RossC. E.MirowskyJ. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 258–276.
45.
RoyK. (2004). Three-block fathers: Spatial perceptions and kin-work in low-income African American neighborhoods. Social Problems, 51(4), 528–548.
46.
SabolW. J.LynchJ. P. (2001). Sentencing and time served in the District of Columbia prior to “truth-in-sentencing” (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice). The Urban Institute.
47.
SemenzaD. C.LinkN. W. (2019). How does reentry get under the skin? Cumulative reintegration barriers and health in a sample of recently incarcerated men. Social Science & Medicine, 243, 112618.
48.
SherbourneC. D.StewartA. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.
49.
StansfieldR.MowenT. J.O’ConnorT. (2018). Religious and spiritual support, reentry, and risk. Justice Quarterly, 35(2), 254–279.
50.
StewartE. A.MartinezR.JrBaumerE. P.GertzM. (2015). The social context of Latino threat and punitive Latino sentiment. Social Problems, 62(1), 68–92.
51.
Troop-GordonW.LaddG. W. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development, 76(5), 1072–1091.
52.
VisherC. A.KachnowskiV. (2007). Finding work on the outside: Results from the “returning home” project in Chicago. In BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 80–114). Russell SAGE Foundation.
53.
VisherC. A.La VigneN.TravisJ. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Maryland pilot study: Findings from Baltimore. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
54.
VisherC. A.TravisJ. (2011). Life on the outside: Returning home after incarceration. The Prison Journal, 91, 102S–119S.
55.
VisherC.FarrellJ. (2005). Chicago communities and prisoners re-entry. Urban Institute.
56.
WallaceD.FahmyC.CottonL.JimmonsC.McKayR.StofferS.SyedS. (2016). Examining the role of familial support during prison and after release on post-incarceration mental health. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 3–20.
57.
WesternB. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
WilperA. P.WoolhandlerS.BoydJ. W.LasserK. E.McCormickD.BorD. H.HimmelsteinD. U. (2009). The health and health care of US prisoners: Results of a nationwide survey. American Journal of Public Health, 99(4), 666–672.
59.
WodahlE. J.MowenT. J.GarlandB. E. (2021). The effect of individual characteristics and supervision experiences on the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32, 523–545.
60.
YahnerJ.VisherC. A. (2008). Illinois prisoners’ reentry success three years after release. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
