Drawing on theoretical propositions of general strain theory (GST), the current study aims to examine whether general victimization as a source of criminogenic strain predicts two different types of bullying, traditional and cyberbullying perpetrations, and whether negative emotionality, such as trait-based anger and depression, conditions the effects of general victimization on bullying. Using a Korean adolescent sample, we adopt cross-lagged dynamic panel models to investigate the longitudinal effects and interactions of strain and negative emotionality. The results indicate a significant influence of general victimization on both types of bullying perpetrations, as expected, while the conditioning effects of negative emotionality are found only for traditional bullying, which may reflect differences in the nature of the two different forms of bullying.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.
2.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361.
3.
AgnewR. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 101–123). Transaction.
4.
AgnewR. (2007). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Roxbury.
AgnewR.BrezinaT.WrightJ. P.CullenF. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00949.x
7.
AllisonP. D.WilliamsR.Moral-BenitoE. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578
8.
AseltineR. H.GoreS.GordonJ. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676320
BomanJ. H.MowenT. J. (2018). The role of turning points in establishing baseline differences between people in developmental and life-course criminology. Criminology, 56(1), 191–224.
11.
BotchkovarE.BroidyL. M. (2013). Accumulated strain, negative emotions, and crime: A test of general strain theory in Russia. Crime & Delinquency, 59(6), 837–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710382346
12.
BroidyL.AgnewR. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306.
13.
CarsonD. C.SullivanC. J.CochranJ. K.LerschK. M. (2009). General strain theory and the relationship between early victimization and drug use. Deviant Behavior, 30(1), 54–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620802050023
14.
ChanH. C. O.WongD. S. W. (2015). The overlap between school bullying perpetration and victimization: Assessing the psychological, familial, and school factors of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3224–3234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0125-7
15.
CiucciE.BaroncelliA. (2014). Emotion-related personality traits and peer social standing: Unique and interactive effects in cyberbullying behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(9), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0020
16.
CraigJ. M.CardwellS. M.PiqueroA. R. (2017). The effects of criminal propensity and strain on later offending. Crime & Delinquency, 63(13), 1655–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716665334
17.
De CosterS.ThompsonM. S. (2017). Race and general strain theory: Microaggressions as mundane extreme environmental stresses. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 903–930.
18.
DonnerC. M.JenningsW. G.BanfieldJ. (2015). The general nature of online and off-line offending among college students. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 663–679.
19.
EitleD. (2010). General strain theory, persistence, and desistance among young adult males. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.08.003
20.
EnglanderE. K. (2013). Understanding cyberbullying in 8-to-10 year olds: New research. In 2013 AAP National Conference and Exhibition. American Academy of Pediatrics.
21.
EspelageD. L.SwearerS. M. (2009). Contributions of three social theories to understanding bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth. In HarrisM. J. (Ed.), Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 151–170). Springer.
22.
FarringtonD. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 17, 381–458.
23.
FrancisK. A. (2014). General strain theory, gender, and the conditioning influence of negative internalizing emotions on youth risk behaviors. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(1), 58–76.
24.
GibbZ. G.DevereuxP. G. (2014). Who does that anyway? Predictors and personality correlates of cyberbullying in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.009
25.
GoldsteinN. E. S.GiallellaC. L.Haney-CaronE.PetersonL.SericoJ.KempK.RomaineC. R.ZelechoskiA. D.HollidayS. B.KalbeitzerR.KelleyS. M.HinzH.SalleeM.PennacchiaD.PrelicA.BurkardC.GrissoT.HeilbrunK.NúñezA.. . . LochmanJ. (2018). Juvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) treatment for girls: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Services, 15(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000184
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
28.
HanY.Grogan-KaylorA. (2013). Parenting and youth psychosocial well-being in South Korea using fixed-effects models. Journal of Family Issues, 34(5), 689–715.
29.
HayC.EvansM. M. (2006). Violent victimization and involvement in delinquency: Examining predictions from general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.03.005
30.
HayC.MeldrumR. (2010). Bullying victimization and adolescent self-harm: Testing hypotheses from general strain theory. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(5), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9502-0
31.
HayC.MeldrumR.MannK. (2010). Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359557
32.
HemphillS. A.KotevskiA.TollitM.SmithR.HerrenkohlT. I.ToumbourouJ. W.CatalanoR. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019
33.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2014). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying (2nd ed.). Corwin.
36.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of management, 24(5), 623–641.
37.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling : Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
38.
JangH.SongJ.KimR. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007
39.
JangS. J. (2007). Gender differences in strain, negative emotions, and coping behaviors: A general strain theory approach. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485486
40.
JangS. J.JohnsonB. R. (2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping among African Americans: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022570729068
41.
JenningsW. G.PiqueroN. L.GoverA. R.PérezD. M. (2009). Gender and general strain theory: A replication and exploration of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/strain hypothesis among a sample of southwestern Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(4), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.06.007
42.
JenningsW. G.SongH.KimJ.FenimoreD. M.PiqueroA. R. (2019). An examination of bullying and physical health problems in adolescence among South Korean youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2510–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0885-3
43.
KendrickK.JutengrenG.StattinH. (2012). The protective role of supportive friends against bullying perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 1069–1080.
44.
KimJ.LeeY. (2019). Does it take a school? Revisiting the tnfluence of first arrest on subsequent delinquency and educational attainment in a tolerant educational background. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(2), 254–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818801053
45.
KimJ.SongH.JenningsW. G. (2017). A distinct form of deviance or a variation of bullying? Examining the developmental pathways and motives of cyberbullying compared with traditional bullying in South Korea. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1600–1625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716675358
46.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
47.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. E.AgatstonP. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
48.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1 Suppl), S13–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
49.
KushnerM.BotchkovarE.AntonaccioO.HughesL. (2020). Exploring vulnerability to deviant coping among victims of crime in two Post-Soviet cities. Justice Quarterly, 1–28.
50.
LeeC. H. (2010). Personal and interpersonal correlates of bullying behaviors among Korean middle school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329124
51.
LeeY.KimJ. (2017). Examining the gendered effect of experienced and vicarious victimization: A general strain theory perspective. American Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9402-x
52.
LianosH.McGrathA. (2018). Can the general theory of crime and general strain theory explain cyberbullying perpetration?Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 674–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714204
53.
LonigroA.SchneiderB. H.LaghiF.BaioccoR.PalliniS.BrunnerT. (2014). Is cyberbullying related to trait or state anger?Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46(3), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0484-0
54.
MarcumC. D.HigginsG. E.FreiburgerT. L.RickettsM. L. (2014). Exploration of the cyberbullying victim/offender overlap by sex. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9217-3
55.
MatsuedaR. (1986). The dynamics of belief and delinquency [Paper presentation]. Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York, NY, United States.
56.
MazerolleP.BurtonV. S.CullenF. T.EvansT. D.PayneG. L. (2000). Strain, anger, and delinquent adaptations specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00041-0
57.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Linking exposure to strain with anger: An investigation of deviant adaptations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(97)00085-8
58.
MoonB.HwangH. W.McCluskeyJ. D. (2011). Causes of school bullying: Empirical test of a general theory of crime, differential association theory, and general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 57(6), 849–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708315740
59.
MoonB.JangS. J. (2014). A general strain approach to psychological and physical bullying: A study of interpersonal aggression at school. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2147–2171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513516863
60.
MoonB.MorashM. (2017). A test of general strain theory in South Korea: A focus on objective/subjective strains, negative emotions, and composite conditioning factors. Crime & Delinquency, 63(6), 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716686486
61.
MoonB.MorashM.McCluskeyJ. D. (2012). General strain theory and school bullying: An empirical test in South Korea. Crime & Delinquency, 58(6), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710364809
62.
MowenT. J.BomanJ. H.IVBrentJ. J. (2018). Assessing the within-person impact of social/behavioral programs, increased supervision, and jail time on polysubstance use during reentry. Corrections, 3(4), 266–287.
63.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanW. J.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094–2100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094
64.
OlweusD. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In PeplerD. J.RubinK. H. (Eds.), The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression (pp. 441–448). Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
OstrowskyM. K.MessnerS. F. (2005). Explaining crime for a young adult population: An application of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.06.004
66.
ParkY.MetcalfeC. (2020). Bullying victimization as a strain: Examining changes in bullying victimization and delinquency among Korean students from a developmental general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(1), 31–65.
67.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth and Society, 43(2), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10366951
68.
PaccagnellaO. (2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation review, 30(1), 66–85.
69.
PellegriniA. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00033-1
70.
PellegriniA. D.BartiniM.BrooksF. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.216
71.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2000). Generalizing general strain theory: An examination of an offending population. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 449–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094631
72.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of broidy and agnew’s gender/gst hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 125–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095761
73.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Vol. 1: Continuous responses. StataCorp LP.
74.
RieffeC.CamodecaM.PouwL. B. C.LangeA. M. C.StockmannL. (2012). Don’t anger me! Bullying, victimization, and emotion dysregulation in young adolescents with ASD. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.680302
75.
SchlichterK. J.HoranJ. J. (1981). Effects of stress inoculation on the anger and aggression management skills of institutionalized juvenile delinquents. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5(4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173687
76.
SharpS. F.Terling-WattT. L.AtkinsL. A.GilliamJ. T.SandersA. (2001). Purging behavior in a sample of college females: A research note on general strain theory and female deviance. Deviant Behavior, 22(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/016396201750065036
77.
SigfusdottirI. D.GudjonssonG. H.SigurdssonJ. F. (2010). Bullying and delinquency. The mediating role of anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 391–396.
78.
SigfusdottirI. D.KristjanssonA. L.AgnewR. (2012). A comparative analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.01.001
79.
SlonjeR.SmithP. K.FrisénA. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.
80.
SolbergM. E.OlweusD. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10047
81.
SongH.LeeY.KimJ. (2020). Gender differences in the link between cyberbullying and parental supervision trajectories. Crime & Delinquency, 66(13–14), 1914–1936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720912371
TanrikuluI.CampbellM. (2015). Correlates of traditional bullying and cyberbullying perpetration among Australian students. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.06.001
84.
Teijón-AlcaláM.BirkbeckC. (2019). Victimization, crime propensity, and deviance: A multinational test of general strain theory. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 35(4), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219870941
85.
ThaxtonS.AgnewR. (2018). When Criminal Coping is Likely: An Examination of Conditioning Effects in General Strain Theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 887–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9358-5
86.
ThomasH. J.ConnorJ. P.ScottJ. G. (2015). Integrating traditional bullying and cyberbullying: challenges of definition and measurement in adolescents–a review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 135–152.
TurnerH. A.FinkelhorD.OrmrodR. (2010). Poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(3), 323–330.
89.
TurnerM. G.ExumM. L.BrameR.HoltT. J. (2013). Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health: General and typological effects across sex. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 53–59.
90.
VaillancourtT.HymelS.McDougallP. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v19n02_10
91.
WaltersG. D. (2020). School-age bullying victimization and perpetration: A meta-analysis of prospective Studies and Research. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906513
92.
WaltersG. D.EspelageD. L. (2018). From victim to victimizer: Hostility, anger, and depression as mediators of the bullying victimization–bullying perpetration association. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.003
93.
WangJ.IannottiR. J.NanselT. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
94.
WangJ.NanselT. R.IannottiR. J. (2011). Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(4), 415–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012
95.
WemmersJ. A.CyrK.ChamberlandC.LessardG.Collin-VézinaD.ClementM. E. (2018). From victimization to criminalization: General strain theory and the relationship between poly-victimization and delinquency. Victims & Offenders, 13(4), 542–557.
96.
WilliamsR.AllisonP. D.Moral-BenitoE. (2018). Linear dynamic panel-data estimation using maximum likelihood and structural equation modeling. Stata Journal, 18(2), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1801800201
97.
WongD. S. W.ChanH. C.ChengC. H. K. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.006
98.
YangF.Nelson-GardellD.GuoY. (2018). The role of strains in negative emotions and bullying behaviors of school-aged children. Children and Youth Services Review, 94(June), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.016
99.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007
100.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005
