Estimating the Size of the Human Trafficking Problem: MSE and Other Strategies

Abstract

The prevalence of human trafficking has remained as elusive as the method of producing its estimation is contested. There are significant variations in the way prevalence estimation is produced, with some methods garnering more attention than others. To complicate the issue further, the hidden nature of human trafficking makes it difficult to apply conventional probability-based sampling strategies, without which for reference purposes one cannot easily assess the merits of alternative estimation techniques. This special issue represents the most recent development and applications of one particular method, the multiple systems estimation (MSE) method. Although we remain biased towards primary data for prevalence estimation, MSE represents a cost-effective alternative for the purposes of advocacy, policymaking, and victim services.

Keywords

prevalence estimation respondent-driven sampling multiple systems estimation mark-and-recapture link tracing sampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdul-Quader

A. S.

Heckathorn

D. D.

Sabin

Saidel

(2006). Implementation and analysis of respondent driven sampling: Lessons learned from the field. Journal of Urban Health, 83(S1), 1–5.

Bales

Hesketh

Silverman

(2015). Human trafficking in the UK: How many victims? Significance, 12, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00824.x

Bernard

H. R.

Killworth

P. D.

Johnsen

E. C.

Robinson

(1991). Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation: Some empirical results. Social Science Research, 20, 109–121.

Cruyff

Jan van Dijk

van der Heijden

(2017). The challenge of counting victims of human trafficking: Not on the record: A multiple systems estimation of the numbers of human trafficking victims in the Netherlands in 2010–2015 by year, age, gender, and type of exploitation. Chance, 30(3), 41–49.

De Cock

(2007). Directions for national and international data collection on forced labor (Working Paper No.30). International Labor Organization.

Farrell

Dank

Kafafian

Lockwood

Pfeffer

Hughes

Vincent

(2019). Capturing human trafficking victimization through crime reporting (Final summary report for NIJ Project 2015-VF-GX-0105). Northeastern University. Retrieved January 15, 2020, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9bb7/3400e837bbedc58f770632f221ac334d1f6a.pdf

Fedina

(2015). Use and misuse of research in books on sex trafficking: Implications for interdisciplinary researchers, practitioners, and advocates. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 16(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014523337

Feehan

D. M.

Salganik

M. J.

(2016). Generalizing the network scale-up method: A new estimator for the size of hidden populations. Sociological Methodology, 46(1), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175016665425

Felix-Medina

M. H.

Thompson

S. K.

(2004). Combining link-tracing sampling and cluster sampling to estimate the size of hidden populations. Journal of Official Statistics, 20, 19–38.

10.

Frank

Snijders

(1994). Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 10(1), 53–67.

11.

Gleason

Cockayne

(2019). Official development assistance and SDG Target 8.7: Measuring aid to address forced labor, modern slavery, human trafficking and child labor, United Nations University Centre for Policy Research, September 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2021, from http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6612/Development_Assistance_and_SDG_Target_8.7_FINAL_WEB_7_.pdf

12.

Gozdziak

Collett

E. A.

(2005). Research on human trafficking in North America: A review of literature. International Migration, 43(1/2), 99–128.

13.

Gupta

Reed

Kershaw

Blankenship

K. M.

(2011). History of sex trafficking, recent experiences of violence, and HIV vulnerability among female sex workers in coastal Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 114(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.005

14.

Heckathorn

D. D.

(1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.

15.

Heckathorn

D. D.

(2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11–34.

16.

International Labor Organization. (2011). Hard to see, harder to count: Survey guidelines to estimate forced labor of adults and children. Author.

17.

International Labor Organization. (2012). ILO global estimate of forced labor: Results and methodology. Special Action Program to Combat Forced Labor (SAP-FL), International Labor Organization.

18.

International labor Organization (ILO). (2018). Guidelines concerning the measurement of forced labor. Endorsed by the 20th International Conference of Labor Statisticians Geneva, 10-19 October 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office. Retrieved July 3, 2021, from https://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/meetings-and-events/international-conference-of-labour-statisticians/20/WCMS_648619/lang—en/index.htm

19.

Killworth

P. D.

Johnsen

E. C.

Bernard

H. R.

Shelley

G. A.

McCarty

(1990). Estimating the size of personal networks. Social Networks, 23, 289–312.

20.

Laczko

Gozdziak

(2005). Data and research on human trafficking: A global survey. International Migration, 43(1/2), 5–16.

21.

Laczko

Gramegna

(2003). Developing better indicators of human trafficking. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(1), 179–194.

22.

Lyneham

Dowling

Bricknell

(2019). Estimating the dark figure of human trafficking and slavery victimisation in Australia. Statistical Bulletin 16. Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved January 15, 2020, from https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/sb_human_trafficking_050219.pdf

23.

Maltiel

Raftery

A. E.

McCormick

T. H.

Baraff

A. J.

(2015). Estimating population size using the network scale up method. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(3), 1247–1277. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS827

24.

Okech

Choi

Y. J.

Elkins

Burns

A. C.

(2018). Seventeen years of human trafficking research in social work: A review of the literature. Journal Of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1415177

25.

Owens

Dank

Farrell

Breaux

Banuelos

Pfeffer

Bright

McDevitt

(2014). Understanding the organization, operation, and victimization process of labor trafficking in the United States. The Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/publications/413249.html

26.

Petersen

(1896). The yearly immigration of young plaice into the limfjord from the german sea. Report of the Danish Biological Station, 6, 5–84.

27.

Robinson

W. T.

Risser

J. M. H.

McGoy

Becker

A. B.

Rehman

Jefferson

Griffin

Wolverton

Tortu

(2006). Recruiting injection drug users: A three-site comparison of results and experiences with respondent-driven and targeted sampling procedures. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 29–38.

28.

Salganik

M. J.

Mello

M. B.

Abdo

A. H.

Bertoni

Fazito

Bastos

F. I.

(2011). The game of contacts: Estimating the social visibility of groups. Social Networks, 33(1), 70–78.

29.

Sarma

(1981). Bonded labour in India. Biblia Impex.

30.

Silverman

(2014). Human trafficking: An application of multiple systems estimation. Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-slavery-an-application-of-multiple-systems-estimation

31.

Steinfatt

T. M.

Baker

(2011). Measuring the extent of sex trafficking in Cambodia: 2008. United Nations Interagency Project on Human Trafficking. Retrieved January 15, 2020, from https://com.miami.edu/projects/measuring-the-extent-of-sex-trafficking-in-cambodia/

32.

Thompson

S. K.

Seber

G. A. F.

(1996). Adaptive sampling. Wiley Series in Probability Statistics.

33.

Tyldum

Brunovskis

(2005). Describing the unobserved: Methodological challenges in empirical studies on human trafficking. International Migration, 43(1–2), 17–34.

34.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2016). Global report on trafficking in persons 2016 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16.IV.6). United Nations Office on Crime and Delinquency.

35.

Vincent

(2019). Recent advances in estimating population size with link-tracing sampling. arxiv preprint: arXiv: 1709.07556.

36.

Vincent

Thompson

S. K.

(2017). Estimating population size with link-tracing sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112(519), 1286–1295.

37.

Weitzer

(2011). Sex trafficking and the sex industry: The need for evidence-based theory and legislation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 1337–1370.

38.

Weitzer

(2014). New directions in research on human trafficking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 6–24.

39.

Zhang

S. X.

(2009). Beyond the “Natasha” story: A review and critique of current research on sex trafficking. Global Crime, 10, 178–195.

40.

Zhang

S. X.

(2012). Measuring labor trafficking: A research note. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 58, 469–482.

41.

Zhang

S. X.

Dank

Vincent

Narayanan

Bharadwaj

(2019). Estimating the prevalence of forced and bonded labor in the Indian State of Bihar. San Diego State University Research Foundation. https://delta87.org/2020/06/human-trafficking-indian-state-bihar-prevalence-characteristics/

42.

Zhang

S. X.

Dank

Vincent

Narayanan

Bharadwaj

Balasubramaniam

S. M.

(2019). Victims without a voice: Measuring worst forms of child labor in the Indian State of Bihar. Victims & Offenders, 14(7), 832–858.

43.

Zhang

S. X.

Spiller

M. W.

Finch

B. C.

Qin

(2014). Estimating labor trafficking among unauthorized migrant workers in San Diego. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 65–86.