A vast body of reentry research has investigated the role of family in facilitating reentry success. However, it is largely unknown whether family can both be a source of support and conflict and if so, whether these impacts are gender-specific. This study explores the heterogeneous elements that family brings to the reintegration process. Findings suggest that released prisoners’ families can bring either crime-inhibitory or criminogenic influences depending on the familial environment. Support from family members protects respondents from criminal recidivism, while strained family relationships are a significant predictor for drug use. Moreover, the detrimental effect of family tension is gender-sensitive: Females released from prison suffer an amplified risk of reentry failure under family tension. Implications for correctional programming are discussed.
Abeling-JudgeD. (2020). Social bonding experiences facilitating desistance in adolescence. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720940952
2.
AdlerF. (1975) Sisters in crime. McGraw-Hill.
3.
AgnewR. (2006). General strain theory: Recent developments and directions for further research. In CullenF. T.WrightJ.ColemanM. (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory, taking stock: The status of criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp.101–123). Transaction Publishers.
4.
ArdittiJ. A.FewA. L. (2006). Mothers’ reentry into family life following incarceration. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 103–123.
5.
BaronS. W. (2004). General strain, street youth and crime: A test of Agnew’s revised theory. Criminology, 42, 457–484.
6.
BeachS. R.FinchamF. D.KatzJ.BradburyT. N. (1996). Social support in marriage. In PierceG. R.SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.,) Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 43–65). Springer.
7.
BelknapJ. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Nelson Education.
8.
BelknapJ.HolsingerK. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48–71.
9.
BergM. T.HuebnerB. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28, 382–410.
10.
BersaniB. E.DohertyE. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: Examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51, 399–433.
11.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2002). A theoretical basis for gender-responsive strategies in criminal justice. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
12.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS.RaederM. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.
13.
BomanJ. H.IVMowenT. J. (2017). Building the ties that bind, breaking the ties that don’t: Family support, criminal peers, and reentry success. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 753–774.
14.
BowlesM. A.DeHartD.WebbJ. R. (2012). Family influences on female offenders’ substance use: The role of adverse childhood events among incarcerated women. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 681–686.
15.
BramanD. (2004). Families and the moral economy of incarceration. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 23, 27–50.
16.
BrankE.LaneJ.TurnerS.FainT.SehgalA. (2008). An experimental juvenile probation program: Effects on parent and peer relationships. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 193–224.
17.
BreeseJ. R.Ra’elK.GrantG. K. (2000). No place like home: A qualitative investigation of social support and its effects on recidivism. Sociological Practice, 2, 1–21.
18.
BroidyL.AgnewR. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 275–306.
19.
BrownT. L.HenggelerS. W.BrondinoM. J.PickrelS. G. (1999). Trauma exposure, protective factors, and mental health functioning of substance-abusing and dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 94–102.
20.
BushwayS. D. (2004). Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 276–291.
21.
CanterR. J. (1982). Sex differences in self–report delinquency. Criminology, 20, 373–394.
22.
CarsonE. A. (2014). Prisoners in 2013. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs. US Department of Justice.
23.
Chesney-LindM.IrwinK. (2013). Beyond bad girls: Gender, violence and hype. Routledge.
24.
Chesney-LindM.SheldonR. G. (2004). Young women, delinquency and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
25.
ClarkT. A. (2001). The relationship between inmate visitation and behavior: Implications for African American families. Journal of African American Men, 6, 43–58.
26.
CohnE. G.RottonJ. (2003). Even criminals take a holiday: Instrumental and expressive crimes on major and minor holidays. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 351–360.
27.
ConnellR. (2012) Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37, 857–881.
28.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19, 829–859.
29.
CovingtonS. (2002). Helping women recover: Creating gender-responsive treatment. In StraussnerS. L. A.BrownS. (Eds.), The handbook of addiction treatment for women: Theory and practice (pp. 52–72). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
30.
CovingtonS. (2003). A woman’s journey home: Challenges for female offenders. In TravisJ.WaulM. (Eds.), Prisoners once removed (pp. 67–103). Urban Institute.
31.
CovingtonS. (2007). Working with substance abusing mothers: A trauma-informed, gender-responsive approach. The Source, 16, 1–11.
32.
De CosterS.Cornell ZitoR. (2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 224–245.
33.
DillonF. R.PantinH.RobbinsM. S.SzapocznikJ. (2008). Exploring the role of parental monitoring of peers on the relationship between family functioning and delinquency in the lives of African American and Hispanic adolescents. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 65–94.
34.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 271–296.
35.
EloI. T.MykytaL.MargolisR.CulhaneJ. F. (2009). Perceptions of neighborhood disorder: The role of individual and neighborhood characteristics. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1298–1320.
36.
FritzS.WhiteacreK. (2016). Prison nurseries: Experiences of incarcerated women during pregnancy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55, 1–20.
37.
Garcia-HallettJ. (2019). “We’re Being Released to a Jungle”: The State of Prisoner Reentry and the Resilience of Women of Color. The Prison Journal, 99, 459–483.
38.
GideonL. (2007). Family role in the reintegration process of recovering drug addicts: A qualitative review of Israeli offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06287104
39.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
40.
GoldnerV. (1991). Toward a critical relational theory of gender. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 249–272.
41.
HerreraV. M.McCloskeyL. A. (2003). Sexual abuse, family violence, and female delinquency: Findings from a longitudinal study. Violence and victims, 18, 319–334.
42.
HerrerosF. (2015). Ties That Bind: Family Relationships and Social Trust. Rationality and Society, 27, 334–357.
43.
HippJ. R. (2016). Collective efficacy: How is it conceptualized, how is it measured, and does it really matter for understanding perceived neighborhood crime and disorder?Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 32–44.
44.
HirschiT. (1969). The causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
45.
HollistD. R.McBroomW. H. (2006). Family structure, family tension, and self-reported marijuana use: A research finding of risky behavior among youths. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 975–998.
46.
JoeK. A.Chesney-LindM. (1995). “Just every mother’s angel” An analysis of gender and ethnic variations in youth gang membership. Gender & society, 9, 408–431.
47.
KaebleD.MaruschakL. M.BonczarT. P. (2015). Probation and parole in the United States, 2014. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
48.
LairdL. (2013). Doing time extended: Ex-offenders face tens of thousands of legal restrictions, bias and limits on their rights. ABA Journal, 99, 50–55.
49.
LattimoreP. K.SteffeyD. M. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Methodology and analytic approach. RTI International.
50.
LattimoreP. K.VisherC. A. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis. Urban Institute.
51.
LiuL. (2020a). Family, parochial, and public levels of social control and recidivism: An extension of the systemic model of social disorganization. Crime & Delinquency, 66, 864–886.
52.
LiuL. (2020b). Parole, neighborhood and reentry outcomes: A contextualized analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20946928
53.
LiuL.MillerS. L.QiuJ.SunD. (2020c). An early adverse experience goes a long, criminogenic, gendered way: The nexus of early adversities, adult offending, and gender. Women & Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1805395
54.
LiuL.MillerS. L. (2019a). Intersectional Approach to top executive white-collar offenders’ discourses: A case study of the martha stewart and sam waksal insider trading scandal. Sociological Inquiry, 89(4), 600–623.
55.
LiuL.MillerS. L. (2019b). Protective factors against juvenile delinquency: Exploring gender with a nationally representative sample of youth. Social Science Research, 86, 102376.
56.
LiuL.MillerS. L.VisherC. A. (2019). The strain of procedural injustice in parole among former prisoners: A test with a mixed-gender sample. Justice Quarterly, 1–25.
57.
LiuL.VisherC. A. (2019). The crossover of negative emotions between former prisoners and their family members during reunion: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58, 567–591.
58.
LiuL.VisherC. A.SunD. (2020d). Do released prisoners’ perceptions of neighborhood condition affect reentry outcomes?Criminal Justice Policy Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420980806
59.
LiuL.VisherC. A.O’ConnellD. J. (2020). The strain from procedural injustice on parolees: Bridging procedural justice theory and general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 66, 250–276.
60.
LynchS. M.DeHartD. D.BelknapJ.GreenB. L. (2013). Women’s pathways to jail: Examining mental health, trauma, and substance use. BJA Policy Brief, NCJ241045.
61.
MallettS.RosenthalD.KeysD. (2005). Young people, drug use and family conflict: Pathways into homelessness. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 185–199.
62.
Mallik-KaneK.VisherC. A. (2008). Health and prisoner reentry: How physical, mental, and substance abuse conditions shape the process of reintegration (p. 82). Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
63.
MarkmanJ. A.DuroseM. R.RantalaR. R.TiedtA. D. (2016). Recidivism of offenders placed on federal community supervision in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1–16.
64.
MartinezD. J. (2006). Informal helping mechanisms: Conceptual issues in family support of reentry of former prisoners. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44, 23–37.
65.
MaruschakL. M.ParksE. (2012). Probation and parole in the United States, 2011. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
66.
McKiernanP.ShamblenS. R.CollinsD. A.StraderT. N.KokoskiC. (2013). Creating lasting family connections: Reducing recidivism with community-based family strengthening model. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 94–122.
67.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Rowman & Littlefield.
68.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (2009). “Doing Gender” the impact and future of a salient sociological concept. Gender & Society, 23, 85–88.
69.
MietheT. D.DrassK. A. (1999). Exploring the social context of instrumental and expressive homicides: An application of qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 1–21.
70.
MillerJ. (1998). Gender and victimization risk among young women in gangs. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 429–453.
71.
MillerJ. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? (Vol. 22). Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies, Wellesley College.
72.
MillerJ. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Beacon Press.
73.
MillerJ. B.JordanJ. V.KaplanA. G.StiverI. P.SurreyJ. L. (1997). Some misconceptions and reconceptions of a relational approach. Women’s growth in diversity: More writings from the Stone Center, 25–49.
74.
MowenT. J.BomanJ. HIV. (2018). The duality of the peer effect: The interplay between peer support and peer criminality on offending and substance use during reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 64(8), 1094–1116.
75.
MowenT. J.StansfieldR.BomanJ. H.IV (2019). Family matters: Moving beyond “if” family support matters to “why” family support matters during reentry from prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56, 483–523.
76.
MowenT. J.VisherC. A. (2015). Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 337–359.
77.
MowenT. J.VisherC. A. (2016). Changing the ties that bind: How incarceration impacts family relationships. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 503–528.
78.
NaserR. L.La VigneN. G. (2006). Family support in the prisoner reentry process: Expectations and realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 93–106.
79.
NaserR. L.VisherC. A. (2006). Family members’ experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review, 7, 20–31.
80.
NelsonM.DeessP.AllenC. (1999). The first month out: Post incarceration experiences in New York City. Vera Institute of Justice.
81.
NeterJ.NachsteinC.WassermanW. (1996). Applied linear regression models. Irwin.
82.
OrfordJ.TempletonL.VellemanR.CopelloA. (2005). Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: A set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction, 100, 1611–1624.
83.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman’s prison. State University of New York Press.
84.
OwenB.BloomB. (1995) Profiling the needs of California’s female prisoners. NIC.
85.
OwenB.BloomB. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 165–185.
86.
PhillipsL. A.LindsayM. (2011). Prison to society: A mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 136–154.
87.
PollockJ. (1998). Counseling women in prison. Sage.
88.
PollockJ. M. (2013). Prisons and prison life (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
89.
PrendergastM. L. (2009). Interventions to promote successful re-entry among drug-abusing parolees. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 5, 4–13.
90.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384–405.
91.
RobbinsC. A.MartinS. S.SurrattH. L. (2009). Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 388–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707306688
92.
RocqueM.BierieD. M.MacKenzieD. L. (2010). Social bonds and change during incarceration: Testing a missing link in the reentry research. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10370457
93.
RosenfieldS. (1980). Sex differences in depression: Do women always have higher rates?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 33–42.
94.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP.SpiropoulosG. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 550–585.
95.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American sociological review, 55, 609–627.
96.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways andturning points through life. Harvard University Press.
97.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Desistance from crime over the life course. In MortimerJ. T.ShanahanM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 295–309). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
98.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H.WimerC. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.
99.
SavolainenJ. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance: Adult social bonds in a Nordic welfare state. The British Journal of Criminology, 49, 285–304.
100.
SawyerW. (2018). The gender divide: Tracking over time women’s state prison growth. Prison Policy Initiative. www.prisonpolicy.org
101.
SeiterR. P.KadelaK. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360–388.
102.
ShapiroC.SchwartzM. (2001). Coming home: Building on family connections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 52–61.
103.
SharpS. F.Marcus-MendozaS. T. (2001). It’s a family affair: Incarcerated women and their families. Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 21–49.
104.
SharpS. F.BrewsterD.LoveS. R. (2005). Disentangling strain, personal attributes, affective response and deviance: A gendered analysis. Deviant Behavior, 26, 133–157.
105.
SkillingT. A.SorgeG. B. (2014). Measuring antisocial values and attitudes in justice-involved male youth: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Pride in Delinquency Scale and the Criminal Sentiments Scale–Modified. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 992–1007.
106.
SmithP.SchweitzerM.LabrecqueR. M.LatessaE. J. (2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 189–199.
107.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281–306.
108.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN. (2018). Focal concerns theory as conceptual tool for studying intersectionality in sentencing disparities: Focus on gender and race along with age. In UlmerJ. T.BradleyM. S. (Eds.), Handbook on punishment decisions: Locations of disparity. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
109.
TaylorC. J. (2015). Gendered pathways to recidivism: Differential effects of family support by gender. Women & Criminal Justice, 25, 169–183.
110.
ThoitsP. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In EckenrodeJ. (Eds.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). Springer.
111.
TravisJ.RobinsonL. O.SolomonA. L. (2002). Prisoner reentry: Issues for practice and policy. Criminal Justice, 17, 12.
112.
UggenC. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529–546.
113.
UggenC.ManzaJ.BehrensA. (2004). Less than the average citizen: Stigma. Role Transition, and the Civic Reintegration of Convicted Felons.
114.
UggenC.ThompsonM.ManzaJ. (2001). Crime, class, and reintegration: The scope and social distribution of America’s criminal class. University of Minnesota Press.
115.
VisherC. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21, 5–28.
116.
VisherC. A.CourtneyS. M. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
VisherC.O’ConnellD.LiuL. (2019). Violent offending, desistance, and recidivism. Marquette Law Review, 983–1000.
119.
VisherC.YahnerJ.La VigneN. (2010). Life After Prison: Tracking the Experiences of Male Prisoners Returning to Chicago, Cleveland, and Houston. Research Brief: URBAN INSTITUTE.
120.
WadeJ. (2008). The ties that bind: Support from birth families and substitute families for young people leaving care. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 39–54.
121.
WaltersG. D.LowenkampC. T. (2016). Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 28, 652.
122.
WarrenP.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2012). The imprisonment penalty for young Black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 56–80.
123.
WesternB. (2015). Lifetimes of violence in a sample of released prisoners. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1, 14–30.
124.
WesternB.BragaA. A.DavisJ.SiroisC. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1512–1547.
125.
WilsonD. B.BouffardL. A.MacKenzieD. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172–204.
126.
WrightJ. P.CullenF. T.MillerJ. T. (2001). Family social capital and delinquent involvement. Journal of criminal Justice, 29, 1–9.
127.
Zoutewelle-TerovanM.Van Der GeestV.LiefbroerA.BijleveldC. (2014). Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 1209–1234.
