Parental knowledge was investigated as a foil to reactive criminal thinking, as represented in the current study by cognitive impulsivity. Cognitive impulsivity and neutralization were tested as mediators of the parental knowledge–child delinquency relationship in 1,734 early adolescents (811 boys, 923 girls) from the Gang Resistance and Education Training (GREAT) study. A path analysis of the first three waves of GREAT data revealed that Wave 2 cognitive impulsivity but not Wave 2 neutralization techniques negatively mediated the link between Wave 1 parental knowledge and Wave 3 child delinquency. These results were replicated in variables measured at Waves 2 through 4. Parental control, in the form of parental knowledge and monitoring, may therefore prevent delinquency by countering cognitive impulsivity.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). SAS Institute.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.
4.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.
5.
CollinsL. M.SchaferJ. L.KamC. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
6.
DishionT.ForgatchM.ChamberlainP.PelhamW. E. (2016). The Oregon model of behavior family therapy: From intervention design to promoting large-scale system change. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 812–837.
7.
EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.JohnsonW.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2009). Parental monitoring, personality, and delinquency: Further support for a reconceptualization of monitoring. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 49–59.
8.
ElwertF.WinshipC. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.
9.
EsbensenF. A. (2002, September). National evaluation of the gang resistance education and training (G.R.E.A.T.) program: Final report (94-IJ-CX-0058). U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
FletcherA. C.SteinbergL.Williams-WheelerM. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, 75(3), 781–796.
11.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
12.
HawkinsJ. D.HerrenkohlT.FarringtonD. P.BrewerD.CatalanoR. F.HarachiT. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106–146). Sage.
13.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.
14.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
15.
HoeveM.DubasJ. S.EichelsheimV. I.van der LaanP. H.SmeenkW.GerrisJ. R. M. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(6), 749–775.
16.
HopeT. L.GrasmickH. G.PointonL. J. (2003). The family in Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Structure, parenting, and self-control. Sociological Focus, 36(4), 291–311.
17.
JanssenH. J.EichelsheimV. I.DekovićM.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2017). Sex differences in longitudinal pathways from parenting to delinquency. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 23(4), 503–521.
KerrM.StattinH.BurkW. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 39–64.
20.
KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E.PatrickC. J.BenningS. D.KramerM. D. (2007). Linking antisocial behavior, substance use, and personality: An integrative quantitative model of the adult externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(4), 645–666.
21.
LaheyB. B.Van HulleC. A.D’OnofrioB. M.RodgersJ. L.WaldmanI. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(6), 807–823.
22.
LykkenD. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(1), 6–10.
23.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
24.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (1997–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
25.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
26.
PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.
27.
ReissA. J. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review, 16(2), 196–207.
28.
StattinH.KerrM. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072–1085.
29.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J.B. Lippincott.
30.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
TokićA.PećnikN. (2010). Parental behaviors related to adolescents’ self-disclosure: Adolescents’ views. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 201–222.
33.
TongL. S. J.FarringtonD. P. (2006). How effective is the “reasoning and rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12(1), 3–24.
34.
WaltersG. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325.
35.
WaltersG. D. (2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079.
36.
WaltersG. D. (2017). Modelling the criminal lifestyle: Theorizing at the edge of chaos. Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
WaltersG. D. (2018). Unsupervised routine activities as a mediator of the parent knowledge–Delinquency relationship. Justice Quarterly, 35(5), 871–894.
38.
WaltersG. D. (2019). Gang influence: Mediating the gang–delinquency relationship with proactive criminal thinking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 1044–1062.
39.
WaltersG. D. (2020). The sibling effect for delinquency: Mediation by proactive criminal thinking and moderation by age. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(5), 265–288.
40.
WaltersG. D.EspelageD. L. (2018). Cognitive insensitivity and cognitive impulsivity as mediators of bullying continuity: Extending the psychological inertia construct to bullying behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(4), 527–536.
41.
WaltersG. D.KiehlK. A. (2015). Limbic correlates of fearlessness and disinhibition in incarcerated youth: Exploring the brain-behavior relationship with the Hare psychology checklist: Youth version. Psychiatry Research, 230, 205–210.
42.
WaltersG. D.YurvatiE. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the PICTS proactive and reactive scores against six putative measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(1), 1–14.
43.
WassermanG. A.KeenanK.TremblayR. E.CoieJ. D.HerrenkohlT. I.LoeberR.PetechukD. (2003, April). Risk and protective factors of child delinquency. U.S. Department of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
