The current study explores populational and environmental factors associated with violent crime. Specifically, it compares ambient and residential populations with regard to their association with assault density at a fine spatial and temporal unit in a city with socio-economic control variables. The results show that the ambient population are consistently associated with the level of assaults throughout the four time periods in a day, while residential population does not contribute much to explaining its variation. In addition, we also find that the percentage of single-member households and the distance to the nearest subway station are constantly associated with assault density, while the proportion of non-residential use and the land price are partially associated.
AddingtonL. A.RennisonC. M. (2015). Keeping the barbarians outside the gate? Comparing burglary victimization in gated and non-gated communities. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 168–192.
2.
AndresenM. A. (2006). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: A synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory: A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 50(4), 487–502.
3.
AndresenM. A. (2007). Location quotients, ambient populations, and the spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(10), 2423–2444.
4.
AndresenM. A. (2010). Diurnal movements and the ambient population: An application to municipal-level crime rate calculations. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52(1), 97–109.
5.
AndresenM. A. (2011). The ambient population and crime analysis. The Professional Geographer, 63(2), 193–212.
6.
AndresenM. A.JenionG. W. (2010). Ambient populations and the calculation of crime rates and risk. Security Journal, 23(2), 114–133.
7.
BaltagiB. H. (2011). Econometrics (5th ed.). Springer.
8.
BerkR.MacDonaldJ. M. (2008). Overdispersion and Poisson regression. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(3), 269–284.
9.
BernascoW.BlockR. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47(1), 93–130.
10.
BhatC. R.GuoJ. Y.SrinivasanS.SivakumarA. (2004). Comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1894(1), 57–66.
11.
BiagiB.BrandanoM. G.DetottoC. (2012). The effect of tourism on crime in Italy: A dynamic panel approach. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6(2012–2025), 1.
12.
BlockR. L.BlockC. R. (1995). Space, place and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. Crime and Place, 4(2), 145–184.
13.
BoggsS. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 899–908.
14.
BrowningC. R.ByronR. A.CalderC. A.KrivoL. J.KwanM.-P.LeeJ.-Y.PetersonR. D. (2010). Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 329–357.
15.
BursikR. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–552.
16.
ChunY. (2014). Analyzing space-time crime incidents using eigenvector spatial filtering: An application to vehicle burglary: Analyzing space-time crime incidents. Geographical Analysis, 46(2), 165–184.
17.
ChunY.GriffithD. A.LeeM.SinhaP. (2016). Eigenvector selection with stepwise regression techniques to construct eigenvector spatial filters. Journal of Geographical Systems, 18(1), 67–85.
18.
ClarkeR. V. G. (1984). Opportunity-based crime rates: The difficulties of further refinement. The British Journal of Criminology, 24(1), 74–83.
19.
ClarkeR. V. G.Bichler-RobertsonG. (1998). Place managers, slumlords and crime in low rent apartment buildings. Security Journal, 11(1), 11–19.
20.
ClarkeR. V. G.FelsonM. (1993). Routine activity and rational choice (Vol. 5). Transaction publishers.
21.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
22.
EckJ. E.WartellJ. (1998). Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems: A randomized experiment. Crime Prevention Studies, 9, 161–185.
23.
FelsonM. (1987). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology, 25(4), 911–932.
24.
FelsonM.CohenL. E. (1980). Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology, 8(4), 389–406.
25.
GerellM. (2018). Bus stops and violence, are risky places really risky?European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24(4), 351–371.
26.
GriffithD. A. (2002). A spatial filtering specification for the auto-Poisson model. Statistics & Probability Letters, 58(3), 245–251.
27.
GriffithD. A. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Springer Science & Business Media.
28.
GriffithD. A. (2010). The Moran coefficient for non-normal data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(11), 2980–2990.
29.
GriffithD. A.ChunY. (2014). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. In FischerM. M.NijkampP. (Eds.), Handbook of regional science (pp. 1477–1507). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
GrubesicT. H.PridemoreW. A. (2011). Alcohol outlets and clusters of violence. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(1), 30.
33.
HainingR.LawJ.GriffithD. A. (2009). Modelling small area counts in the presence of overdispersion and spatial autocorrelation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(8), 2923–2937.
34.
HarriesK. D. (1981). Alternative denominators in conventional crime rates. In BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 147–165). SAGE Publications, Inc.
35.
HartT. C.MietheT. D. (2014). Street robbery and public bus stops: A case study of activity nodes and situational risk. Security Journal, 27(2), 180–193.
36.
HippJ. R.BatesC.LichmanM.SmythP. (2018). Using social media to measure temporal ambient population: Does it help explain local crime rates?Justice Quarterly, 1–31.
37.
JangY.KimD.ParkJ.KimD. (2018). Conditional effects of open-street closed-circuit television. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 53, 9–24.
38.
KimK.LeeG. (2016). A study on improvement of estimating de facto population using mobile telecommunications bid data. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 19(2), 181–196.
KinneyJ. B.BrantinghamP. L.WuschkeK.KirkM. G.BrantinghamP. J. (2008). Crime attractors, generators and detractors: Land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment, 34(1), 62–74.
41.
LeeG.KimK. (2016). Estimating de facto population using spatial statistics. Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association, 16(2), 71–93.
42.
LockwoodD. (2007). Mapping crime in Savannah: Social disadvantage, land use, and violent crimes reported to the police. Social Science Computer Review, 25(2), 194–209.
43.
MallesonN.AndresenM. A. (2015). Spatio-temporal crime hotspots and the ambient population. Crime Science, 4(1), 10.
44.
MallesonN.AndresenM. A. (2016). Exploring the impact of ambient population measures on London crime hotspots. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 52–63.
45.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics, 105–142.
46.
McFaddenD. (1977). Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: Some recent developments. In HensherD. A.StopherP. R. (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling, Croom Helm, 279–318.
47.
NewmanO. (1972). Defensible space. Macmillan New York.
48.
OsgoodD. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.
49.
PelfreyW. V. (1998). Tourism and crime: A preliminary assessment of the relationship of crime to the number of visitors at selected sites. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 22(2), 293–304.
50.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J.HarrisM. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 31–63.
51.
QuickM.LawJ.LiG. (2017). Time-varying relationships between land use and crime: A spatio-temporal analysis of small-area seasonal property crime trends. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 0, 1–18.
52.
RoncekD. W.MaierP. A. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots.”Criminology, 29(4), 725–753.
53.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
54.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
55.
SchieblerS. A.CrottsJ. C.HollingerR. C. (1996). Florida tourists’ vulnerability to crime. In PisamA.MansfeldY. (Eds.), Tourism, crime, and international security issues (pp. 37–50). Wiley.
56.
SchubertJ. L. (2009). Incorporating time and daily activities into an analysis of urban violent crime [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Dallas.
57.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.
58.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–56.
59.
SmithW. R.FrazeeS. G.DavisonE. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38(2), 489–524.
60.
SnowdenA. J.PridemoreW. A. (2013). Alcohol outlets, social disorganization, land use, and violence in a large college town: Direct and moderating effects. Criminal Justice Review, 38(1), 29–49.
61.
SorgE. T.TaylorR. B. (2011). Community-level impacts of temperature on urban street robbery. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(6), 463–470.
62.
StuckyT. D.OttensmannJ. R. (2009). Land use and violent crime. Criminology, 47(4), 1223–1264.
63.
StuckyT. D.SmithS. L. (2017). Exploring the conditional effects of bus stops on crime. Security Journal, 30(1), 290–309.
64.
Telecommunication & Policy Research Group. (2017). An assessment of telecommunication market competition in 2017. Korea Information Society Development Institute.
65.
ToblerW. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234.
66.
YuS. V. (2009). Bus stops and crime: Do bus stops increase crime opportunities in local neighborhoods?. Rutgers University.
67.
ZellnerA. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
