Although evidence regarding the journey-to-crime in juvenile offenders is available for some areas of the world, little is known about their mobility patterns in Southern Europe. Variables such as prosocial facilities, transport stations, or socioeconomic backdrop have been proved to influence the traveled distance. Therefore, we aimed to confirm previous findings in the journey-to-crime literature using data provided by the Juvenile Justice Department of the Basque Country (Spain). Although some results are in line with those of previous studies, emphasizing the relevance of environmental factors for better understanding crime patterns in the juvenile population, other specific patterns also emerged that suggest the need to replicate research across countries and to consider specific behavior patterns and styles of spatial design in each study setting.
AckermanJ. M.RossmoD. K. (2015). How far to travel? A multilevel analysis of the residence-to-crime distance. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(2), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9232-7
AverdijkM.BernascoW. (2015). Testing the situational explanation of victimization among adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814546197
4.
BaudainsP.BraithwaiteA.JohnsonS. D. (2013). Target choice during extreme events: A discrete spatial choice model of the 2011 London riots. Criminology, 51(2), 251–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12004
5.
BeauregardE.ProulxJ.RossmoD. K. (2005). Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(5), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2004.12.003
BichlerG.Christie-MerrallJ.SechrestD. (2011). Examining juvenile delinquency within activity space: Building a context for offender travel patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 472–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810393014
BichlerG.OroscoC. A.SchwartzJ. A. (2012). Take the car keys away: Metropolitan structure and the long road to delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.12.002
10.
BowermanB. L.O’ConnellR. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Duxbury Press.
11.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1981). Environmental criminology. SAGE.
12.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L.AndresenM. A. (2017). The geometry of crime and crime pattern theory. In WortleyR.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 98–117). Routledge.
13.
ClarkeR. V.EckJ. E. (2003). Become a problem solving crime analyst in 55 small steps. Willan Publishing.
14.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
15.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer.
16.
DaviesA.DaleA. (1995). Locating the stranger rapist. Home Office Police Department.
17.
DrawveG.WalkerJ. T.FelsonM. (2015). Juvenile offenders: An examination of distance-to-crime and crime clusters. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.963677
18.
FelsonM. (2017). The routine activity approach. In WortleyR. K.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 87–97). Routledge.
19.
FilionP. (2001). Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: What difference do they make?Environmental and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3375
GroffE. R.McEwenT. (2007). Integrating distance into mobility triangle typologies. Social Science Computer Review, 25(2), 210–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307298924
22.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
23.
HoebenE.WeermanF. (2016). Why is involvement in unstructured socializing related to adolescent delinquency?Criminology, 54(2), 242–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12105
24.
JohnsonS. D.SummersL. (2015). Testing ecological theories of offender spatial decision making using a discrete choice model. Crime & Delinquency, 61(3), 454–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714540276
25.
KasankoM.BarredoJ. I.LavalleC.McCormickN.DemicheliL.SagrisV.BrezgerA. (2006). Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(1–2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2005.02.003
26.
LevineN.LeeP. (2013). Journey-to-crime by gender and age group in Manchester, England. In LeitnerM. (Ed.), Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (pp. 145–178). Springer.
27.
LundriganS.CzarnomskiS.WilsonM. (2010). Spatial and environmental consistency in serial sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.100
28.
MeldrumR. C.ClarkJ. (2015). Adolescent virtual time spent socializing with peers, substance use, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 61(8), 1104–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713492499
29.
MenardS. W. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. SAGE.
30.
MentingB.LammrsM.RuiterS.BernascoW. (2016). Family matters: Effects of family members’ residential areas on crime location choice. Criminology, 54(3), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12109
31.
MoserG.CeballosE. A.ArroyaveA.Alvarado MoratoJ. A.Restrepo GiraldoL. M.Alzate LlanosJ.Patiǫ MuǫzA. C.Pinzn̤ Cr̀denasJ. P. (2014). Psicologa̕ ambiental: Aspectos de las relaciones individuo-medioambiente. Ecoe Ediciones.
32.
MurrayR. K.SwattM. L. (2013). Disaggregating the relationship between schools and crime: A spatial analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 59(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709348438
33.
OsborneD.McCordE. S.HigginsG. E. (2016). The interactive influence of prosocial places, youth population, and poverty on incidents of violent assault. Deviant Behavior, 37(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1026772
34.
PauwelsL. J. R.BruinsmaG. J. N.WeermanF. M.WimH.BernascoW. (2018). Research on neighborhoods in European cities. In BruinsmaG. J. N.JohnsonS. D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 345–377). Oxford University Press.
35.
ReingleJ. M.JenningsW. G.Maldonado-MolinaM. M.PiqueroA. R.CaninoG. (2011). Investigating the role of gender and delinquency in exposure to violence among Puerto Rican youth. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211412571
RossmoD.DaviesA.PatrickM. (2004). Exploring the geo-demographic and distance relationships between stranger rapists and their offences. Home Office, Crime and Policing Group, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
38.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
39.
Serrano-MaílloA. (2009). Oportunidad y delito. Dykinson.
40.
Sypion-DutkowskaN.LeitnerM. (2017). Land use influencing the spatial distribution of urban crime: A case study of Szczecin, Poland. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6030074
41.
TelepC. W.WeisburdD. (2018). Crime concentration at places. In BruinsmaG. J. N.JohnsonS. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 583–603). Oxford University Press.
42.
ThompsonB. (2013). Overview of traditional/classical statistical approaches. In LittleT. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 7–25). Oxford University Press.
43.
TitaG.GriffithsE. (2005). Traveling to violence: The case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427804270051
44.
TownsleyM. (2017). Offender mobility. In WortleyR. K.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 141–161). Routledge.
45.
VandeviverC.Van DaeleS.Vander BekenT. (2015). What makes long crime trips worth undertaking? Balancing costs and benefits in Burglars’ journey to crime. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu078
46.
VázquezD.Fernández-MolinaE.StruseS. P.BelmonteM. (2014). El perfil geográfico de la delincuencia juvenil: Un análisis de las características espaciales asociadas a la movilidad delictiva de los jóvenes. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 12, 6–37.
WeisburdD.GroffE. R.YangS.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press.
49.
WeisburdD.MorrisN. A.GroffE. R. (2009). Hot spots of juvenile crime: A longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9075-9
50.
WikströmP.-O. H.CeccatoV.HardieB.TreiberK. (2010). Activity fields and the dynamics of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9083-9
51.
WikströmP.-O. H.TreiberK. (2016). Social disadvantage and crime: A criminological puzzle. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(10), 1232–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216643134
52.
WortleyR. (2017). Situational precipitators of crime. In WortleyR. K.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 62–86). Routledge.
