Neighborhood Prison Admission Rates and the Sunbelt: Variation in Imprisonment,Concentrated Disadvantage,and Their Relationship Across the United States
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2020
Neighborhood Prison Admission Rates and the Sunbelt: Variation in Imprisonment,Concentrated Disadvantage,and Their Relationship Across the United States
Regional differences in the use of prison are, in part, due to cultures of punishment within Sunbelt states. To date, this has been largely studied at the state level, ignoring the smaller geographic areas in which the effects of imprisonment are deeply felt. We employ a novel data set to examine the relationship between prison and region and regional variation in the relationship between concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood imprisonment. We find that region affects neighborhood prison admission rates in unexpected ways, and that the relationship between concentrated disadvantage and prison admissions varies in magnitude by region. We discuss the implications of these findings for better understanding the impact of region and the processes that lead to imprisonment.
AbbottC. (1987). The suburban Sunbelt. Journal of Urban History, 13, 275-301. doi:10.1177/009614428701300305
2.
AkinsS.RumbautR. G.StansfieldR. (2009). Immigration, economic disadvantage, and homicide: A community-level analysis of Austin, Texas. Homicide Studies, 13, 307-314. doi:10.1177/1088767909336814
3.
AnackerK. B. (2016). The new American suburb: Poverty, race and the economic crisis. London, England: Routledge.
4.
BlackD. J. (1976). The Behavior of Law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
CampbellM. C. (2011). Politics, prisons, and law enforcement: An examination of the emergence of “law and order” politics in Texas. Law & Society Review, 45, 631-665.
6.
CampbellM. C. (2014). The emergence of penal extremism in California: A dynamic view of institutional structures and political processes. Law & Society Review, 48, 377-409. doi:10.1111/lasr.12072
7.
CampbellM. C. (2018). Varieties of mass incarceration: What we learn from state histories. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 219-234. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091957
8.
CampbellM. C.SchoenfeldH. (2013). The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 1375-1423. doi:10.1086/669506
9.
CampbellM. C.VogelM.WilliamsJ. (2015). Historical contingencies and the evolving importance of race, violent crime, and region in explaining mass incarceration in the United States. Criminology, 53, 180-203. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12065
10.
CampbellW. L.SwanH.JalbertS. K. (2017). National variations in fieldwork goals, training, and activities. Federal Probation, 81(3), 15-21.
11.
ChamlinM. B.CochranJ. K. (1995). Assessing Messner and Rosenfeld’s Institutional Anomie Theory: A partial test. Criminology, 33, 411-429. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01184.x
12.
ClearT. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
ClearT. R.RoseD. R.WaringE.ScullyK. (2003). Coercive mobility and crime: A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Quarterly, 20, 33-64.
14.
CookeT.MarchantS. (2006). The changing intrametropolitan location of high-poverty neighbourhoods in the US, 1990-2000. Urban Studies, 43, 1971-1989. doi:10.1080/00420980600897818
15.
CoultonC. J.ChowJ.WangE. C.SuM. (1996). Geographic concentration of affluence and poverty in 100 metropolitan areas, 1990. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 186-216. doi:10.1177/107808749603200203
16.
DochukD. (2012). From bible belt to Sunbelt: Plain-folk religion, grassroots politics, and the rise of evangelical conservatism. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
17.
EasonJ. M.ZuckerD.WildemanC. (2017). Mass imprisonment across the rural-urban interface. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672, 202-216. doi:10.1177/0002716217705357
18.
EngelR. S.WordenR. E. (2006). Police officers’ attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: An analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41, 131-166. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00984.x
19.
FloridaR.MellanderC. (2015). Segregated cities. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Martin Prosperity Institute.
20.
GelmanA.FaganJ.KissA. (2007). An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 813-823. doi:10.1198/016214506000001040
21.
GoldsteinJ. A. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. Yale Law Journal, 69,543-594.
22.
GreenT. M. (1997). Police as frontline mental health workers. The decision to arrest or refer to mental health agencies. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, 469-486.
23.
HalimS.StilesB. L. (2001). Differential support for police use of force, the death penalty, and perceived harshness of the courts: Effects of race, gender, and region. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0093854801028001001
24.
HarcourtB. E.LudwigJ. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. The University of Chicago Law Review, 73, 271-320.
25.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D.HerbertC. W. (2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647, 214-236. doi:10.1177/0002716213477070
26.
HillE. W.BrennanJ. F.WolmanH. L. (1998). What is a central city in the United States? Applying a statistical technique for developing taxonomies. Urban Studies, 35, 1935-1969.
IcelandJ.SharpG.TimberlakeJ. M. (2013). Sun Belt rising: Regional population change and the decline in black residential segregation, 1970–2009. Demography, 50(1), 97-123.
29.
IngramJ. R. (2007). The effect of neighborhood characteristics on traffic citation practices of the police. Police Quarterly, 10, 371-393. doi:10.1177/1098611107306995
30.
JohnsonR. R. (2012). Police organizational commitment: The influence of supervisor feedback and support. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 1155-1180. doi:10.1177/0011128712466887
31.
JuddD. R.SimpsonD.Abu-LughodJ. L. (2011). City, revisited: Urban theory from Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
KlingerD. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00877.x
33.
KlingerD. (2004). Environment and organization: Reviving a perspective on the police. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 119-136. doi:10.1177/0002716203262498
34.
KnightG. M. (2015). The impact of loose coupling on police effectiveness. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50, 269-281. doi:10.1177/0004865815620704
35.
LeovyJ. (2015). Ghettoside: A true story of murder in America. New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.
36.
LevernierW.PartridgeM. D.RickmanD. S. (2002). The causes of regional variations in U.S. poverty: A cross-county analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 473-497. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00184
37.
LuallenJ.CutlerC. (2017). The growth of older inmate populations: How population aging explains rising age at admission. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72, 888-900. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv069
38.
LuallenJ.GaesG.CutlerC. (2019). Estimating prison stays among current prison populations. Criminal Justice Review, 44, 119–147. doi:10.1177/0734016818769705
39.
LuallenJ.KlingR. (2014). A method for analyzing changing prison populations: Explaining the growth of the elderly in prison. Evaluation Review, 38, 459-486. doi:10.1177/0193841X14541657
40.
LynchM. (2010). Sunbelt justice: Arizona and the transformation of American punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
LynchM. (2011). Mass incarceration, legal change, and locale. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 673-698. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00733.x
42.
LynchM.OmoriM.RoussellA.ValasikM. (2013). Policing the “progressive” city: The racialized geography of drug law enforcement. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 335-357. doi:10.1177/1362480613476986
43.
LyonsC. J.VélezM. B.SantoroW. A. (2013). Neighborhood Immigration, Violence, and City-Level Immigrant Political Opportunities. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 604-632. doi:10.1177/0003122413491964
44.
MessnerS. F. (1983). Regional differences in the economic correlates of the urban homicide rate. Criminology, 21, 477-488. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00275.x
45.
MitraR.BuliungR. N. (2012). Built environment correlates of active school transportation: neighborhood and the modifiable areal unit problem. Journal of Transport Geography, 20(1), 51-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.00
46.
MorenoffJ. D.HardingD. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 411-429. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145511
47.
MullerC.WildemanC. (2016). Geographic Variation in the Cumulative Risk of Imprisonment and Parental Imprisonment in the United States. Demography, 53(5), 1499-1509. doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0493-7
48.
OmoriM. (2016). Spatial dimensions of racial inequality: Neighborhood racial characteristics and drug sentencing. Race and Justice, 7, 35-58. doi:10.1177/2153368716648461
49.
OwenB.MobleyA. (2012). Realignment in California: Policy and research implications. Western Criminology Review, 13(2), 46-52.
50.
PackJ. R. (2005). Sunbelt/Frostbelt: Public policies and market forces in metropolitan development. New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press.
51.
PageJ. (2011). The toughest beat: Politics, punishment, and the prison officers union in California. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
PfaffJ. F. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration—And how to achieve real reform. New York, NY: Basic Books.
54.
RameyD. M. (2013). Immigrant revitalization and neighborhood violent crime in established and new destination cities. Social Forces, 92, 597-629. doi:10.1093/sf/sot085
55.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2004). Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18, 61-72. doi:10.1080/13658810310001596076
56.
RhodesW.GaesG.LuallenJ.KlingR.RichT.CutlerC. (2017). Incidence and cumulative incidence as supplemental measures of the scale of imprisonment. Crime & Delinquency, 64, 888-916. doi:10.1177/0011128717731998
57.
RhodesW.GaesG.LuallenJ.KlingR.RichT.ShivelyM. (2014). Following incarceration, most released offenders never return to prison. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1003-1025. doi:10.1177/0011128714549655
58.
RhodesW.KlingR.LuallenJ.DyousC. (2015). Federal sentencing disparity: 2005-2012. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
59.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319-342. doi:10.1177/019027250406700401
60.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
61.
SmithD. A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. Crime and Justice, 8, 313-341. doi:10.1086/449126
62.
StansfieldR.AkinsS.RumbautR. G.HammerR. B. (2013). Assessing the effects of recent immigration on serious property crime in Austin, Texas. Sociological Perspectives, 56, 647-672. doi:10.1525/sop.2013.56.4.647
63.
StromE. (2017). How place matters: A view from the Sunbelt. Urban Affairs Review, 53, 197-209. doi:10.1177/1078087416633533
64.
SunI. Y.PayneB. K.WuY. (2008). The impact of situational factors, officer characteristics, and neighborhood context on police behavior: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 22-32. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.12.004
65.
TerrillW.ReisigM. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 291-321. doi:10.1177/0022427803253800
66.
TriestR. K. (1997, January). Regional differences in family poverty. New England Economic Review, pp. 3-17.
67.
VogelM. (2015). The modifiable areal unit problem in person—Context research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 112-135. doi:10.1177/0022427815597039
WooldredgeJ. (2007). Neighborhood effects on felony sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 238-263. doi:10.1177/0022427807299825
