The Role of Parental Status and Involvement in Sentence Length Decisions: A Comparison of Men and Women Sentenced to Prison

Abstract

Drawing upon familial paternalism theory, this study explores the effects of parental status and involvement on prison sentence length among men and women. To carry out this research, we relied on a combination of official and self-report data on 919 offenders sentenced to prison in Arizona. Results revealed that parents were not sentenced significantly differently from offenders without children; although women and mothers were punished more severely than their male counterparts. In addition, mothers who lived with their children before arrest received shorter prison terms than mothers who were uninvolved in their lives. Parental involvement was not a significant predictor of fathers’ prison sentences, however. This study illuminates the complex interplay between parenthood, gender, and sentencing.

Keywords

sentencing punishment prisons offenders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.

Albonetti

C. A.

(2002). Joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 39-57.

Arditti

J. A.

(2012). Parental incarceration and the family: Psychological and social effects of imprisonment on children, parents, and caregivers. New York: New York University Press.

Bickle

G. S.

Peterson

R. D.

(1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38, 372-394.

Blackwell

B. S.

Holleran

Finn

M. A.

(2008). Impact of the Pennsylvania sentencing guidelines on sex differences in sentencing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 399-418.

Bloom

Brown

(2011). Incarcerated women: Motherhood on the margins. In Lawston

J. M.

Lucas

A. E.

(Eds.), Razor wire women: Prisoners, activists, scholars, and artists (pp. 51-66). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bontrager

Barrick

Stupi

(2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 16, 349-372.

Brennan

P. K.

Spohn

(2009). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and sex on sentence length decisions in federal courts. Race and Social Problems, 1, 200-217.

Burgess-Proctor

Huebner

B. M.

Durso

J. M.

(2016). Comparing the effects of maternal and paternal incarceration on adult daughters’ and sons’ criminal justice system involvement: A gendered pathways analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1034-1055.

10.

Carson

A. E.

(2018). Prisoners in 2016. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

11.

Clear

T. R.

(2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

12.

Crew

B. K.

(1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8(1), 59-83.

13.

Daly

(1987a). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152-175.

14.

Daly

(1987b). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21, 267-290.

15.

Daly

(1989a). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 35(1), 136-168.

16.

Daly

(1989b). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender & Society, 3(1), 9-36.

17.

Daly

Bordt

R. L.

(1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 141-175.

18.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in us federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 1-27.

19.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 242-269.

20.

Edin

Nelson

T. J.

(2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

Farrell

(2004). Measuring judicial and prosecutorial discretion: Sex and race disparities in departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 6(2), 45-78.

22.

Fernando

Curry

S. T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318-339.

23.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 378-395.

24.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24, 143-167.

25.

Glaze

L. E.

Maruschak

L. M.

(2008). Parents in prison and their minor children. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

26.

Griffin

Wooldredge

(2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44, 893-923.

27.

Hanlon

T. E.

O’Grady

K. E.

Bennett-Sears

Callaman

J. M.

(2005). Incarcerated drug-abusing mothers: Their characteristics and vulnerability. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31(1), 59-77.

28.

Hartley

R. D.

Maddan

Spohn

C. C.

(2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407.

29.

Herzog

Oreg

(2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law & Society Review, 42(1), 45-74.

30.

Koons-Witt

B. A.

(2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297-328.

31.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court corrections to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 897-932.

32.

Kruttschnitt

(1982). Women, crime, and dependency, an application of the theory of law. Criminology, 19, 495-513.

33.

Kruttschnitt

(1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 213-232.

34.

Kruttschnitt

Green

D. E.

(1984). The sex-sanctioning issue: Is it history? American Sociological Review, 49, 541-551.

35.

Kruttschnitt

McCarthy

(1985). Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: Does sex really matter. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 151-175.

36.

Mann

C. R.

(1984). Race and sentencing of female felons: A field study. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 7, 160-172.

37.

Mustard

D. B.

(2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285-314.

38.

Nagel

I. H.

Hagan

(1983). Gender and crime Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In Tonry

M. H.

Morris

(Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 4, pp. 91-144). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

39.

Nagel

I. H.

Johnson

B. L.

(1994). The role of gender in a structured sentencing system: Equal treatment, policy choices, and the sentencing of female offenders under the United States sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 181-221.

40.

Pierce

M. B.

(2013). Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? In Russell

(Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders (pp. 181-190). New York, NY: Springer.

41.

Pierce

M. B.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2011). Assessing the influence of familial paternalism on child neglect sentencing decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 421-433.

42.

Russell

(Ed.). (2012). Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses. New York, NY: Springer.

43.

Spohn

(1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 365-399.

44.

Spohn

(2014). Twentieth-century sentencing reform movement: Looking backward, moving forward. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 535-545.

45.

Spohn

Beichner

(2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.

46.

Spohn

Brennan

P. K.

(2011). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on substantial assistance departures in federal courts. Race and Justice, 1(1), 49-78.

47.

Spohn

C. C.

(2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427-501.

48.

Spohn

C. C.

Brennan

P. K.

Kim

(2017). Racial and ethnic disparities among female offenders adjudicated in federal courts: Explicating the patterns of disparities using a path model. In Jeffrey

Ulmer Bradley

Mindy S.

(Eds.), Handbook on punishment decisions. (PP. 211-238). New York, NY: Routledge.

49.

Spohn

C. C.

Spears

J. W.

(1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 29-59.

50.

Spohn

Fornango

(2009). US attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47, 813-846.

51.

Stacey

A. M.

Spohn

(2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three us district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11(1), 43-76.

52.

Starr

S. B.

(2015). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases. American Law and Economics Review, 17, 127-159.

53.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2006). Does gender modify the effects of race–ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.

54.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.

55.

Steffensmeier

Motivans

(2000). Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law offending patterns and sentencing outcomes. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S141-S151.

56.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.

57.

Tillyer

Hartley

R. D.

Ward

J. T.

(2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(7), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0093854814560624

58.

Turanovic

J. J.

Rodriguez

Pratt

T. C.

(2012). The collateral consequences of incarceration revisited: A qualitative analysis of the effects on caregivers of children of incarcerated parents. Criminology, 50, 913-959.

59.

Zatz

M. S.

(1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147-171.