This study examines the influence of the type of defense counsel on prosecutorial and judicial decisions in domestic violence cases. We found that the type of defense counsel mattered more in sentencing compared with previous decision points. Cases handled by private attorneys were less likely to experience charge reductions at screening and be dismissed. However, decision patterns are reversed postarraignment, where charges start to decrease at a higher rate for cases represented by private counsel. Defendants represented by private lawyers were less likely to plead guilty, but they were also markedly less likely to face incarceration.
AndersonJ. M.HeatonP. (2012). How much difference does the lawyer make: The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcomes. Yale Law Journal, 122, 154-217.
2.
BallJ. D. (2006). Is it a prosecutor’s world? Determinants of count bargaining decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22, 241-260.
3.
BechtelK. A.AlaridL. F.HolsingerA.HolsingerK. (2012). Predictors of domestic violence prosecution in a state court. Victims & Offenders, 7, 143-160.
4.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.StevensM. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
5.
BondC. E.JeffriesS. (2014). Similar punishment? Comparing sentencing outcomes in domestic and non-domestic violence cases. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 849-872.
6.
ChiricosT. G.BalesW. D. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29, 701-724.
7.
CohenT. H. (2014). Who is better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 29-58.
8.
CramerE. P. (1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1137-1150.
9.
DavisR. C.O’SullivanC. S.FaroleD. J.RempelM. (2008). A comparison of two prosecution policies in cases of intimate partner violence: Mandatory case filing versus following the victim’s lead. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 633-662.
10.
DawsonM.DinovitzerR. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18, 593-622.
FaganJ. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
13.
FeeleyM. M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
FelsonR. B.PareP. P. (2007). Does the criminal justice system treat domestic violence and sexual assault offenders leniently?Justice Quarterly, 24, 435-459.
15.
FradellaH. F.FischerR. G. (2010). Factors impacting sentence severity of intimate partner violence offenders and justification for the types of sentences imposed by mock judges. Law & Psychology Review, 34, 25-53.
16.
HansonR. A.OstromB. J.HewittW.LomvardiasC. (1992). Indigent defenders: Get the job done and done well. National Center for State Courts.
17.
HartleyR. D.MillerH. V.SpohnC. (2010). Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1063-1070.
18.
HenningK.FederL. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offenses: An investigation of factors predictive of court outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 612-642.
19.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C. (2007). Intimate partner violence: The role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 24, 460-495.
20.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C.BerdahlT.BladesC.RossiS. (2001). Domestic violence: The role of interracial/ethnic dyads in criminal court processing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 123-141.
21.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C.SutherlandS. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40, 553-578.
22.
KutateladzeB. L. (2018). Tracing charge trajectories: A study of the influence of race in charge changes at case screening, arraignment, and disposition. Criminology, 56, 123-153.
23.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R. (2014). Prosecution and racial justice in New York County—Technical report. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
24.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514-551.
MarcusR. (1994). Racism in our courts: The underfunding of public defenders and its disproportionate impact upon racial minorities. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 22, 219-268.
27.
McCoyC. (1993). Politics and plea bargaining: Victims’ rights in California. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
OrloffN. M. (2014). Domestic violence offenses: The influence of victim-offender relationship on prosecutorial and judicial decision making (Doctoral dissertation). Boston College, Boston, MA.
30.
PinchevskyG. M. (2017). Exploring the effects of court dispositions on future domestic violence offending: an analysis of two specialized domestic violence courts. Journal of interpersonal violence, 32(4), 558-580.
31.
RomainD. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2013). Prosecutorial discretion for domestic violence cases: An examination of the effects of offender race, ethnicity, gender, and age. Criminal Justice Studies, 26, 289-307.
32.
RomainD. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2016). Chivalry revisited: Gender, race/ethnicity, and offense type on domestic violence charge reduction. Feminist Criminology, 11, 191-222.
33.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests for misdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), Article 1.
34.
SmithE. L.DuroseM. R.LanganP. A. (2008). State court processing of domestic violence cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
35.
SpohnC. (2002). How do judges decide? The quest for fairness and justice in sentencing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
36.
TartaroC.SedelmaierC. M. (2009). A tale of two counties: The impact of pretrial release, race, and ethnicity upon sentencing decisions. Criminal Justice Studies, 22, 203-221.
37.
TrumanJ. L.MorganR. E. (2015). Nonfatal domestic violence, 2003-2012. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law & Law Enforcement, 8, 535-564.
VenturaL. A.DavisG. (2005). Domestic violence: Court case conviction and recidivism. Violence Against Women, 11, 255-277.
40.
WilliamsM. R. (2002). A comparison of sentencing outcomes for defendants with public defenders versus retained counsel in a Florida circuit court. Justice System Journal, 23, 249-257.
