The Effect of the Physical Environment on Crime Rates: Capturing Housing Age and Housing Type at Varying Spatial Scales

Abstract

This study introduces filtering theory from housing economics to criminology and measures the age of housing as a proxy for deterioration and physical disorder. Using data for Los Angeles County in 2009 to 2011, negative binomial regression models are estimated and find that street segments with older housing have higher levels of all six crime types tested. Street segments with more housing age diversity have higher levels of all crime types, whereas housing age diversity in the surrounding ½-mile area is associated with lower levels of crime. Street segments with detached single-family units generally had less crime compared with other types of housing. Street segments with large apartment complexes (five or more units) generally have more crime than those with small apartment complexes and duplexes.

Keywords

neighborhoods crime housing characteristics housing age

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baer

W. C.

Williamson

C. B.

(1988). The filtering of households and housing units. Journal of Planning Literature, 3, 127-152.

Barthe

E. P.

Leone

M. C.

Stitt

B. G.

(2014). Trailer parks as hotbeds of crime: Fact or fiction? Issues in Social Science, 2, 1-20.

Barton

M. S.

(2016). Gentrification and violent crime in New York City. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1180-1202.

Baumer

E. P.

(2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579-616.

Bernasco

(2010). A sentimental journey to crime: Effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology, 48, 389-416.

Bernasco

Ruiter

Block

(2016). Do street robbery location choices vary over time of day or day of week? A test in Chicago. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 244-275.

Boessen

Hipp

J. R.

(2015). Close-ups and the scale of ecology: Land uses and the geography of social context and crime. Criminology, 53, 399-426.

Boggess

L. N.

Hipp

J. R.

(2016). The spatial dimensions of gentrification and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Justice Quarterly, 33, 584-613.

Bowers

(2014). Risky facilities: Crime radiators or crime absorbers? A comparison of internal and external levels of theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 389-414.

10.

Brantingham

P. L.

Brantingham

P. J.

(1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.

11.

Brantingham

P. L.

Brantingham

P. J.

(2008). Crime pattern theory. In Wortley

Mazerolle

(Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 78-93). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.

12.

Chang

(2011). Social crime or spatial crime? Exploring the effects of social, economical, and spatial factors on burglary rates. Environment and Behavior, 43, 26-52.

13.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

14.

Cohen

M. L.

Zhang

(1988). The difficulty of improving statistical synthetic estimation. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.

15.

Contreras

(2016). A block-level analysis of medical marijuana dispensaries and crime in the city of Los Angeles. Justice Quarterly, 34, 1069-1095.

16.

Coulson

N. E.

Bond

E. W.

(1990). A hedonic approach to residential succession. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 433-444.

17.

Cui

Walsh

(2015). Foreclosure, vacancy and crime. Journal of Urban Economics, 87, 72-84.

18.

Delmelle

E. C.

(2015). Five decades of neighborhood classifications and their transitions: A comparison of four US Cities, 1970-2010. Applied Geography, 57, 1-11.

19.

Deryol

Wilcox

Logan

Wooldredge

(2016). Crime places in context: An illustration of the multilevel nature of hot spot development. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 305-325.

20.

Ellen

I. G.

O’Regan

K. M.

(2011). How low income neighborhoods change: Entry, exit, and enhancement. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 89-97.

21.

Felson

(2002). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22.

Freeman

Cai

(2015). White entry into Black neighborhoods: Advent of a new era? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 302-318.

23.

Galster

G. C.

Tatian

P. A.

Santiago

A. M.

Pettit

K. L. S.

Smith

R. E.

(2003). Why not in my backyard? Neighborhood impacts of deconcentrating assisted housing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

24.

Gault

Silver

(2008). Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999). Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 240-243.

25.

Groff

E. R.

Lockwood

(2014). Criminogenic facilities and crime across street segments in Philadelphia: Uncovering evidence about the spatial extent of facility influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 277-314.

26.

Hipp

J. R.

(2016). General theory of spatial crime patterns. Criminology, 54, 653-679.

27.

Hipp

J. R.

Boessen

(2013). Egohoods as waves washing across the city: A new measure of “neighborhoods.” Criminology, 51, 287-327.

28.

Hipp

J. R.

Boessen

(2015). Neighborhoods, networks, and crime. In Cullen

F. T.

Wilcox

Sampson

R. J.

Dooley

(Eds.), Challenging criminological theory: The legacy of Ruth Kornhauser, pp. 275-298. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publication.

29.

Hoyt

(1933). One hundred years of land values in Chicago (Dissertation). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

30.

Hwang

Sampson

R. J.

(2014). Divergent pathways of gentrification: Racial inequality and the social order of renewal in Chicago neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 79, 726-751.

31.

Infogroup. (2015). Reference USA historical business data. (Infogroup, Ed.). Papillion, NE: Reference USA.

32.

Jacobs

(1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.

33.

Kim

Y-A

. (2018). Examining the relationship between the structural characteristics of place and crime by imputing census block data in street segments: Is the pain worth the gain? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 67-110.

34.

King

(2013). Jane Jacobs and “the need for aged buildings”: Neighborhood historical development pace and community social relations. Urban Studies, 50, 2407-2424.

35.

Kinney

J. B.

Brantingham

P. L.

Wuschke

Kirk

M. G.

Brantingham

P. J.

(2008). Crime attractors, generators and detractors: Land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment, 34, 62-74.

36.

Kreager

Lyons

C. L.

Hays

Z. R.

(2011). Urban revitalization and Seattle crime, 1982−2000. Social Problems, 58, 615-639.

37.

Kubrin

C. E.

Hipp

J. R.

(2016). Do fringe banks create fringe neighborhoods? Examining the spatial relationship between fringe banking and neighborhood crime rates. Justice Quarterly, 33, 755-784.

38.

Lipton

Gruenewald

(2002). The spatial dynamics of violence and alcohol outlets. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 187-195.

39.

Lowry

I. S.

(1960). Filtering and housing standards: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 36, 362-370.

40.

McCarty

W. P.

Hepworth

D. P.

(2013). Mobile home parks and crime: Does proximity matter? Journal of Crime and Justice, 36, 319-333.

41.

Murray

R. K.

Roncek

D. W.

(2008). Measuring diffusion of assaults around bars through radius and adjacency techniques. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 199-220.

42.

Newman

(1972). Defensible space: People and design in the violent city. London, England: Architectural Press.

43.

O’Brien

D. T.

Sampson

R. J.

(2015). Public and private spheres of neighborhood disorder: Assessing pathways to violence using large-scale digital records. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 486-510.

44.

Owens

(2012). Neighborhoods on the rise: A typology of neighborhoods experiencing socioeconomic ascent. City & Community, 11, 345-369.

45.

Papachristos

A. V.

Smith

C. M.

Scherer

M. L.

Fugiero

M. A.

(2011). More coffee, less crime? The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City & Community, 10, 215-240.

46.

Patino

J. E.

Duque

J. C.

Pardo-Pascual

J. E.

Ruiz

L. A.

(2014). Using remote sensing to assess the relationship between crime and the urban layout. Applied Geography, 55, 48-60.

47.

Raleigh

Galster

(2015). Neighborhood disinvestment, abandonment, and crime dynamics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37, 367-396.

48.

Ratcliffe

J. H.

(2012). The spatial extent of criminogenic places: A changepoint regression of violence around bars. Geographical Analysis, 44, 302-320.

49.

Roncek

D. W.

Maier

P. A.

(1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots.”. Criminology, 29, 725-753.

50.

Rosenthal

S. S.

(2014). Are private markets and filtering a viable source of low-income housing? Estimates from a “repeat income” model†. The American Economic Review, 104, 687-706.

51.

Ross

C. E.

Mirowsky

Pribesh

(2002). Disadvantage, disorder, and urban mistrust. City & Community, 1, 59-82.

52.

Rossmo

D. K.

(2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

53.

St. Jean

P. K. B

. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

54.

Sampson

R. J.

Groves

W. B.

(1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.

55.

Sampson

R. J.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Earls

(1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.

56.

Skogan

W. G.

(1986). Fear of crime and neighborhood change. In Reiss

A. J.

Tonry

(Eds.), Communities and crime (Vol. 8, pp. 203-229). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57.

Skogan

W. G.

(1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York, NY: The Free Press.

58.

Smith

L. B.

Rosen

K. T.

Fallis

(1988). Recent developments in economic models of housing markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 29-64.

59.

Smith

W. R.

Frazee

S. G.

Davison

E. L.

(2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38, 489-523.

60.

Steenbeek

Völker

Flap

van Oort

(2012). Local businesses as attractors or preventers of neighborhood disorder. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 213-248.

61.

Steinberg

(1979). Synthetic estimates for small areas: Statistical workshop papers and discussion. In Joseph Steinberg (Ed.) National institute on drug abuse research monograph series (Vol. 24, p. 282). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

62.

Stucky

T. D.

Ottensmann

J. R.

(2009). Land use and violent crime. Criminology, 47, 1223-1264.

63.

Taylor

R. B.

(1996). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11, 41-74.

64.

Taylor

R. B.

(1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113-155.

65.

Taylor

R. B.

Covington

(1988). Neighborhood changes in ecology and violence. Criminology, 26, 553-589.

66.

Theodos

Coulton

C. J.

Pitingolo

(2015). Housing unit turnover and the socioeconomic mix of low-income neighborhoods. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 117-135.

67.

Weisburd

Groff

Yang

S. -M.

(2012). The criminology of place. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

68.

Wilson

J. Q.

Kelling

(March, 1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic, 249(3):29–38.