Few tests of General Strain Theory (GST) have examined the relative effects of objective and subjective strains on delinquency and the mediating effects of situational-based negative emotions linking strains to delinquency. With a sample of approximately 800 Korean adolescents, the present study tests a model that includes five key objective and the corresponding subjective strains identified as most predictive of delinquency, and situational-based anger and depression in response to each strain. Regardless of whether conceptualized as objective or subjective, three strains (teachers’ punishment, gender discrimination, and criminal victimization) have positive effects on delinquent behaviors. No indicators of situational-based anger and depression (except anger in response to victimization in a negative direction) have direct effects on delinquency or have mediating effects linking strains to delinquency. The results provide limited support for GST’s specification of the relatively greater effects of subjective than objective strains on delinquency and mediating effects of situational-based negative emotions. Theoretical implications are discussed.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-88.
2.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 319-361.
3.
AgnewR. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory: Taking stock—The status of criminological theory (pp. 101-123). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
4.
AgnewR.BrezinaT. (1997). Relational problems with peers, gender, and delinquency. Youth & Society, 29, 84-111.
5.
AgnewR.BrezinaT.WrightJ. P.CullenF. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43-71.
6.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
AseltineR. H.Jr.GoreS.GordonJ. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 256-275.
8.
BaoW.HaasA.PiY. (2004). Life strain, negative emotions, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 281-297.
9.
BaronS. W. (2004). General strain, street youth and crime: A test of Agnew’s revised theory. Criminology, 42, 457-484.
10.
BotchkovarE. V.TittleC. R.AntonaccioO. (2009). General strain theory: Additional evidence using cross-cultural data. Criminology, 47, 131-176.
11.
BroidyL. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39, 9-35.
12.
DerogatisL. R. (1977). SCL-90: Administration, scoring, and procedures Manual for the revised version. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
13.
DoeS. S. (2000). Cultural factors in child maltreatment and domestic violence in Korea. Children and Youth Service Review, 22, 231-236.
14.
FroggioG.AgnewR. (2007). The relationship between crime and “objective” versus “subjective” strains. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 81-87.
15.
HahmH. C.GutermanN. B. (2001). The emerging problem of physical child abuse in South Korea. Child Maltreatment, 6, 169-179.
JangS. J.JohnsonB. R. (2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping among African Americans: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 79-105.
18.
JangS. J.RhodesJ. R. (2012). General strain and non-strain theories: A study of crime in emerging adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 176-186.
19.
KimD. H.KimK. I.ParkY. C.ZhangL. D.LuM. K.LiD. G. (2000). Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: A transcultural study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1163-1173.
20.
LandrineH.KlonoffE. A. (1996). The schedule of racist events: A measure of racial discrimination and a study of its negative physical and mental health consequences. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 144-168.
21.
LeeK.LeeS. (2009). Korean youths penal survey: Focusing on the relationship between strains and deviance. Seoul: Korea Policy Research Institution. (In Korean)
22.
LeeM.LarsonR. (2000). The Korean “examination hell”: Long hours of studying, distress, and depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 249-271.
23.
LinW.MieczkowskiT. (2011). Subjective strains, conditioning factors, and juvenile delinquency: General strain theory in Taiwan. Asian Criminology, 6, 69-87.
24.
MazerolleP. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65-91.
25.
MazerolleP.MaahsJ. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753-777.
26.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1997). Violent responses to strain: An examination of conditioning influences. Violence and Victims, 12, 323-344.
27.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA.CapowichG. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime: Further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35, 131-157.
28.
MoonB.MorashM. (2004). Adaptation of theory for alternative cultural contexts: Agnew’s general strain theory in South Korea. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 28, 77-104.
29.
MoonB.MorashM.McCluskeyC. P.HwangH. (2009). A comprehensive test of general strain theory: Key strains, situational- and trait-based negative emotions, conditioning factors, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 182-212.
30.
MorashM.MoonB. (2007). Gender differences in the effects of strain on the delinquency of South Korean youth. Youth & Society, 38, 300-321.
Pang Jong-Hwan Research Center. (2010). 한국 어린이ㆍ청소년 행복지수의 국제비교 [International comparison of Korean children ㆍ adolescents]. Seoul, South Korea: Author.
33.
PaternosterR.MazerolleP. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 235-263.
34.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2000). Generalizing general strain theory: An examination of an offending population. Justice Quarterly, 17, 449-484.
35.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125-157.
36.
SharpL.LipskyM. (2002). Screening for depression across the lifespan: A review of measures for use in primary care settings. American Family Physician, 66, 1001-1008.
