Tyler’s process-based model of regulation suggests that when citizens perceive the police as a legitimate authority, they are more likely to cooperate in the form of reporting crimes and providing information to the police. Yet most studies have considered citizens’ perceptions of police legitimacy—few studies have asked the police what they feel makes them legitimate in the eyes of the public. Likewise, no studies have considered whether the police believe legitimacy is associated with cooperation from the public. The present study addresses this gap using data from a stratified sample of U.S. police executives. Findings suggest police believe performance, rather than procedural justice, is the key to generating cooperation from the public.
AndridgeR. R.LittleR. J. (2010). A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. International Statistical Review, 78, 40-64.
2.
BeethamD. (1991). The legitimation of power. London, England: Macmillan.
3.
BottomsA.TankebeJ. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119-170.
4.
BradfordB. (2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 24, 22-43. doi:10.1080/10439463.2012.724068
5.
CarrabineE. (2004). Power, resistance, and discourse: A genealogy of the Strangeways Prison riot. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
6.
CoicaudJ. (2002). Legitimacy and politics: A contribution to the study of political right and political responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
8.
DillmanD. A.PhelpsG.TortoraR.SwiftK.KohrellJ.BerckJ.MesserB. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38, 1-18.
9.
FullerW. A.KimJ. K. (2005). Hot deck imputation for the response model. Survey Methodology, 31, 139-149.
10.
GauJ. M. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 489-498.
11.
GauJ. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 187-205. doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9220-8
12.
GauJ. M.CorsaroN.StewartE. A.BrunsonR. K. (2012). Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 333-343.
13.
GmelG. (2001). Imputation of missing values in the case of a multiple item instrument measuring alcohol consumption. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2369-2381.
14.
HindsL.MurphyK. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27-42.
15.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.StankoB.HohlK. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. London, England: Routledge.
16.
Jonathan-ZamirT.HarpazA. (2014). Police understanding of the foundations of their legitimacy in the eyes of the public: The case of commanding officers in the Israel National Police. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 469-489. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu001
17.
Jonathan-ZamirT.WeisburdD. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 3-32.
18.
LumC.TelepC. W.KoperC. S.GriecoJ. (2012). Receptivity to research in policing. Justice Research and Policy, 14, 61-96.
19.
MasonC. H.PerreaultW. D. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 268-280.
20.
MawbyR. (2013). Burglary. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
MazerolleL.BennettS.AntrobusE.EgginsE. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 343-367.
22.
MurphyK.CherneyA. (2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 181-201.
23.
MurphyK.HindsL.FlemingJ. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research & Policy, 18, 136-155.
24.
MurphyK.TylerT. R.CurtisA. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?Regulation and Governance, 3, 1-26.
25.
NixJ. (2015). Police perceptions of their external legitimacy in high and low crime areas of the community. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
26.
NixJ.WolfeS. E.RojekJ.KaminskiR. J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610-640. doi:10.1177/0011128714530548
27.
PearsonK. (1895). Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240-242.
28.
ReisigM. D.BrattonJ.GertzM. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005-1028.
29.
ReisigM. D.TankebeJ.MeškoG. (2014). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and public cooperation with the police among young Slovene adults. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 14(2), 147-164.
30.
SampsonR. J.BartuschD. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777-804.
31.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In GabbidonS.Greene& H. (Eds.), Race, crime, and justice: A reader(pp. 177-190). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
SaratA. (1977). Studying American legal culture. Law & Society Review, 11, 427-488.
33.
SargeantE.MurphyK.CherneyA. (2013). Ethnicity, trust and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model. European Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 500-524. doi:1477370813511386.
34.
SmithM. R.KaminskiR. J.AlpertG. P.FridellL.MacDonaldJ.KubuB. (2010). A multi-method evaluation of police use of force outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
35.
SudmanS. (1976). Applied sampling. New York, NY: Academic Press.
36.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513-548.
37.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
TankebeJ. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter?Criminology, 47, 1265-1293.
39.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103-135.
40.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of law. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice (pp. 283-357). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84-99.
43.
TylerT. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322-342.
44.
TylerT. R. (2011). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 254-266.
45.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
46.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell-Sage.
47.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of authority. Criminology, 42, 253-281.
WolfeS. E. (2011). The effect of low self-control on perceived police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 67-74.
50.
WolfeS. E.NixJ.KaminskiR. J.RojekJ. (2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing explanations of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 253-282.
