On Gang Affiliation,Gang Databases,and Prosecutorial Outcomes

Abstract

Technological advances have enabled criminal justice organizations to collect and share offender data. Accompanying these advances are concerns about how various segments of the criminal justice system utilize these data. Specifically, scholars have expressed concerns about the legal consequences of being included in gang databases. This study explored the use of gang affiliation indicators on prosecutorial outcomes by using a sample of 5,111 urban juvenile cases. Using three binary measures of gang affiliation, multinomial logistic regression analysis suggested indicators of gang affiliation influenced prosecutorial outcomes (dismissal, pre-adjudication informal supervision, deferred prosecution, or petition), but in an unanticipated manner. Confirmed gang affiliates, instead of suspected or non-gang affiliates, were significantly more likely to experience pre-adjudication informal supervision over other forms of case outcomes: case dismissal, deferred prosecution, or court petition. Policy implications focus on the inter-connectedness of the criminal justice system.

Keywords

gangs gang databases prosecutorial outcomes official response to gangs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T. T.

(2005). Taking a juvenile into custody: Situational factors that influence police officers’ decisions. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 32, 121-129.

Armstrong

G. S.

Rodriguez

(2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22, 521-539.

Barnes

J. C.

Beaver

K. M.

Miller

J. M.

(2010). Estimating the effect of gang membership on nonviolent and violent delinquency: A counterfactual analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 437-451.

Barrows

Huff

C. R.

(2009). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 675-703.

Battin

S. R.

Hill

K. G.

Abbott

R. D.

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

(1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93-115.

Becker

(1963). Outsiders. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bell

Jr. Lang

(1985). The intake dispositions of juvenile offenders. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 22, 309-328.

Black

D. J.

(1971). The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 23, 1087-1111.

Blackburn

Mullings

Marquart

Trulson

(2007). The next generation of prisoners. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 5, 35-56.

10.

Blackburn

Trulson

(2010). Sugar and spice and everything nice? Exploring institutional misconduct among serious and violent female delinquents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1132-1140.

11.

Caudill

J. W.

(2010a). Back on the swagger: Institutional release and recidivism timing among gang affiliates. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 8, 58-70.

12.

Caudill

J. W.

(2010b). Social control at the margins: Utility of Black’s theory of law in policing gang affiliates (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3421469)

13.

Caudill

J. W.

Morris

R. G.

El Sayed

Yun

DeLisi

(2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 11, 183-195.

14.

Caudill

J. W.

Trulson

C. R.

(2011). Arrested today, out tomorrow: Patrol officers’ perceptions of a broken justice system. In DeLisi

Conis

(Eds.), Violent offenders: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 281-300). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

15.

Egley

Jr. Howell

J. C.

(2011). Highlights of the 2009 National Youth Gang Survey. Juvenile Justice Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

16.

Esbensen

Huizinga

(1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565-589.

17.

Fox

K. A.

Lane

(2010). Perceptions of gangs among prosecutors in an emerging gang city. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 595-603.

18.

Frazier

C. E.

Bishop

D. M.

(1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 1132-1152.

19.

Gilbeaut

(1998). Gang busters. ABA Journal, 84(1), 64-69.

20.

Jacobs

J. B.

(2009). Gang databases: Context and questions. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 705-709.

21.

Johnson

C. M.

Webster

B. A.

Connors

E. F.

Saenz

D. J.

(1995). Gang enforcement problems and strategies: National survey findings. Journal of Gang Research, 3(1), 1-18.

22.

Kakar

(2005). Gang membership, delinquent friends, and criminal family members: Determining connections. Journal of Gang Research, 13(1), 41-52.

23.

Katz

C. M.

Webb

V. J.

(2006). Policing gangs in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Katz

C. M.

Webb

V. J.

Decker

S. H.

(2005). Using the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program to further understand the relationship between drug use and gang membership. Justice Quarterly, 22, 58-88.

25.

Kennedy

D. M.

(2009). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 711-716.

26.

Klein

M. W.

(2004). Gang cop: The words and ways of Officer Paco Domingo. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

27.

Klein

M. W.

(2009). Street gang databases: A view from the Gang Capitol of the United States. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 717-721.

28.

Knox

G. W.

Martin

Tromanhauser

E. D.

McCurrie

T. F.

Laskey

J. A.

(1995). A research note: Preliminary results of the 1995 national prosecutor’s survey. Journal of Gang Research, 2(4), 59-71.

29.

Leiber

M. J.

Stairs

J. M.

(1999). Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 36, 56-86.

30.

Long

J. S.

(1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Long

J. S.

Freese

(2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

32.

Lopez

(2008). Understanding adolescent property crime using a delinquent events perspective. Deviant Behavior, 29, 581-610.

33.

Lundman

R. J.

Sykes

R. E.

Clark

J. P.

(1978). Police control of juveniles: A replication. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 15, 74-91.

34.

Maxson

C. L.

Hennigan

K. M.

Sloane

D. C.

(2005). “It’s getting crazy out there”: Can a civil gang injunction change a community? Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 577-606.

35.

McCorkle

R. C.

Miethe

T. D.

(1998). The political and organizational response to gangs: An examination of a “moral panic” in Nevada. Justice Quarterly, 15, 41-64.

36.

Minor

K. I.

Hartman

D. J.

Terry

(1997). Predictors of juvenile court actions and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 328-344.

37.

Pyrooz

D. C.

Wolfe

S. E.

Spohn

(2011). Gang-related homicide charging decisions: The implementation of a specialized prosecution unit in Los Angeles. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 3-26.

38.

Ray

K. E. B.

Alarid

L. F.

(2004). Examining racial disparity of male property offenders in the Missouri Juvenile Justice System. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 2, 107-128.

39.

Shelden

R. G.

Snodgrass

(1992). Comparing gang and non-gang offenders: Some tentative findings. The Gang Journal, 1(1), 73-86.

40.

Short

J. F.

(2009). Gangs, law enforcement, and the academy. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 723-731.

41.

Smith

D. A.

Visher

C. A.

(1981). Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems, 29, 167-177.

42.

Spergel

(2009). Gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 667-674.

43.

Spergel

Curry

G. D.

Chance

Kane

Ross

R. E.

Alexander

. . .Oh

(1991). Youth gangs: Problem and response. Chicago, IL: National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Program, School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.

44.

Stanko

E. A.

(1981). The arrest versus the case: Some observations on police/district attorney interaction. Urban Life, 9, 395-414.

45.

Thrasher

F. M.

(1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

46.

Trulson

(2007). Determinants of disruption. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 5, 7-34.

47.

Trulson

Haerle

DeLisi

Marquart

(2011). Blended sentencing, early release, and recidivism of violent institutionalized delinquents. The Prison Journal, 91, 255-278.

48.

Trulson

Marquart

Mullings

Caeti

T. J.

(2005). In between adolescence and adulthood. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 3, 355-387.

49.

Vaughn

M. G.

Howard

M. O.

Harper-Chang

(2006). Do prior trauma and victimization predict weapon carrying among delinquent youth? Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 4, 314-327.

50.

Walker

(2006). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

51.

Winfree

L. T.

Jr. Backstrom

T. V.

Mays

G. L.

(1994). Social learning theory, self-reported delinquency, and youth gangs: A new twist on a general theory of crime and delinquency. Youth & Society, 26, 147-177.

52.

Zatz

M. S.

(1987). Chicano youth gangs and crime: The creation of a moral panic. Contemporary Crises, 11, 129-158.