The merger of Hirschi’s social bonding and Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theories has resulted in a recent redefinition of self-control as the “tendency to consider the full range of potential costs of a particular act.” The present study clarifies the implications of Hirschi’s redefinition, advances a new measure of redefined self-control, and provides an empirical test of key hypotheses using data from a Midwestern sample of adolescents. Results indicate that the alternative measure of redefined self-control has predictive validity. Although redefined self-control and social bonds are not the same thing, they are moderately correlated. Net of controls, redefined self-control has a significant direct effect on marijuana use and partially mediates the effect of social bonds.
AkersR. L. (1990). Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 653-676.
2.
AkersR. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201-211.
3.
AkersR. L. (2008). Self-control and social learning theory. In GoodeE. (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 77-89). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
AkersR. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
5.
AkersR. L. (2010). Religion and crime. Criminologist, 35, 2-6.
6.
AkersR. L.KrohnM. D.Lanza-KaduceL.RadosevichM. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636-655.
7.
AkersR. L.SellersC. S. (2009). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
8.
BurkettS. R.WhiteM. (1974). Hellfire and delinquency: Another look. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 455-462.
9.
BouffardJ. A.RiceS. K. (2011). The influence of the social bond on self-control at the moment of decision: Testing Hirschi’s redefinition of self-control. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 138-157.
10.
ElliottD. S.AgetonS. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 45, 95-110.
11.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.JrArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
13.
HigginsG. E. (2007). Examining the original Grasmick scale: A Rasch model approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 157-178.
14.
HigginsG. E.RickettsM. L.VeghD. T. (2008). The role of self-control in college student’s perceived risk and fear of online victimization. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 223-233.
15.
HigginsG. E.WolfeS. E.MarcumC. D. (2008). Digital piracy: An examination of three measurements of self-control. Deviant Behavior, 29, 440-460.
16.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
HirschiT. (1986). On the compatibility of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In CornishD.ClarkeR. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 105-118). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
18.
HirschiT. (2004). Self-control and crime. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537-552). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1994). The generality of deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
20.
HirschiT.StarkR. (1969). Hellfire and delinquency. Social Problems, 17, 202-213.
21.
HuberP. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 221-233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
KrohnM. D.MasseyJ. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the social bond. Sociological Quarterly, 21, 529-544.
23.
MarcusB. N. (2004). Self-control in the general theory of crime: Theoretical implications of a measurement problem. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 33-55.
24.
MorrisR. G.GerberJ.MenardS. (2011). Social bonds, self-control, and adult criminality: A nationally representative assessment of Hirschi’s revised self-control theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 584-599.
25.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467-496.
26.
PiqueroA. R. (2008). Measuring self-control. In GoodeE. (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 26-37). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
PiqueroA. R.BouffardJ. A. (2007). Something old, Something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24, 1-27.
28.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 897-929.
29.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
30.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SmithD. (1995). Criminology for social work. Hampshire, UK: Macmillan.
33.
TaylorC. (2001). The relationship between social and self-control: Tracing Hirschi’s criminological career. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 369-388.
34.
WardJ. T.GibsonC. L.BomanJ.LeiteW. L. (2010). Assessing the validity of the retrospective behavioral self-control scale: Is the general theory of crime stronger than the evidence suggests?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 336-357.
35.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
WatkinsA. M.MeldeC. (2007). The effect of self-control on unit and item nonresponse in an adolescent sample. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 267-294.
37.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 50, 1-25.
