Focused deterrence initiatives, including the most famous, Boston’s Operation Ceasefire, have been associated with significant reductions in violence in several U.S. cities. Despite early successes, some cities have experienced long-term sustainability issues. Recent work in Cincinnati, Ohio, has focused on institutionalizing focused deterrence in an attempt to achieve sustainability. Despite these efforts, it became apparent that institutionalization was necessary, but insufficient, to achieve long-term success. This study turns to criminological theory to understand why focused deterrence works and how the model can be improved to maximize crime prevention potential. In doing so, the authors draw from the principles of effective intervention from correctional rehabilitation research and describe how these elements have been integrated into the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
AndrewsD. A.DowdenC. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100.
4.
AndrewsD. A.ZingerI.HogeR. D.BontaJ.GendreauP.CullenF. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
5.
BourgoisP. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BragaA. A.KennedyD. M.WaringE. J.PiehlA. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 195-225.
7.
BragaA. A.McDevittJ.PierceG. L. (2006). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 9, 20-46.
8.
BragaA. A.PierceG. L.McDevittJ.BondB. J.CroninS. (2008). The strategic prevention of gun violence among gang-involved offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25, 132-162.
9.
BrownM. K. (1981). Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
BrughaR.VarvasovszkyZ. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15, 239-246.
11.
BrunsonR.MillerJ. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613-640.
12.
ButlerA.ChapmanJ.FormanE.BeckA. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17-31.
13.
ChermakS.McGarrellE. (2004). Problem-solving approaches to homicide: An evaluation of the Indianapolis Violence Reduction Partnership. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 161-192.
14.
CissnerA.FaroleD. (2009). Avoiding failures of implementation: Lessons from process evaluations. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
15.
ClarkeR. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime and Justice, 4, 225-256.
16.
ClarkeR. V.CornishD. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.
17.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 88-100.
18.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In SmithM. J.CornishD. B. (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (pp. 41-96). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
19.
CorsaroN.McGarrellE. F. (2009). Testing a promising homicide reduction strategy: Re-assessing the impact of the Indianapolis “pulling levers” intervention. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 63-82.
20.
DaviesG.DedelK. (2006). Violence risk screening in community corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 743-770.
21.
DolanM.DoyleM. (2007). Psychopathy: Diagnosis and implications for treatment. Psychiatry, 6, 404-408.
22.
DowdenC.AndrewsD. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Correctional Research, 11, 1-6.
23.
DowdenC.AndrewsD. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-468.
24.
EngelR. S.BakerS. G.TillyerM. S.EckJ.DunhamJ. (2008). Implementation of the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV): Year 1 Report. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Policing Institute.
25.
EisensteinJ.JacobH. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
26.
FarringtonD. P. (1986). Age and crime. Crime and Justice, 7, 189-250.
27.
FeeleyM. M. (1983). Court reform on trial: Why simple solutions fail. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
FeeleyM. M.SimonJ. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
29.
FelsonM. (1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 119-128). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
30.
FelsonM.ClarkeR. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief (Police Research Series, Paper 98). London, England: Home Office.
31.
FieldsG. (2009, June13). Cities join unorthodox anticrime program. Wall Street Journal, p. A3.
GendreauP. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In HarlandA. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
GendreauP.FrenchS.TaylorA. (2002). What works (what doesn’t) revised 2002: The principles of effective correctional treatment. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada.
35.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-608.
36.
GendreauP.RossR. R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
37.
GendreauP.SmithP.GogginC. (2000). Treatment programs in corrections. In WinterdykJ. (Ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social reaction to crime (pp. 238-263). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
38.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-583.
39.
HorneyJ.SpohnC. (1991). Rape law reform and instrumental change in six urban jurisdictions. Law & Society Review, 25, 117-153.
40.
IzzoR.RossR. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents: A brief report. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 134-142.
41.
John Jay College of Criminal Justice. (2009, June15). John Jay College launches “National Network for Safe Communities” to reduce violent crime and overt drug markets and to build a new standard of practice for reducing crime in the US [Press release]. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.jjay.cuny.edu/2666.php.
42.
KaplanR. S.NortonD. P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, September/October, 134-147.
43.
KaplanR. S.NortonD. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January/February, 75-85.
44.
KennedyD. M. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449-484.
45.
KennedyD. M. (2007, February15). Making communities safer: Youth violence and gang interventions that work (Prepared testimony before the house judiciary subcommittee on crime, terrorism, and homeland security). New York, NY: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
46.
KennedyD. M.BragaA. A. (1998). Homicide in Minneapolis. Homicide Studies, 2, 263-290.
47.
LandenbergerN.LipseyM. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
48.
LipseyM. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In McGuireJ. (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 35-62). Chichester, England: Wiley.
49.
LipseyM.WilsonD. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE.HolsingerA. (2006). The risk principle in action: What we have learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 1-17.
52.
MartinsonsM.DavisonR.TseD. (1999). The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25, 71-88.
53.
MarunaS.LebelT. P.MitchellN.NaplesM. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 271-281.
54.
McGarrellE. F.ChermakS.WilsonJ. M.CorsaroN. (2006). Reducing homicide through a “lever-pulling” strategy. Justice Quarterly, 23, 214-231.
55.
MearsD. (2007). Towards rational and evidence-based crime policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 667-682.
56.
MillerW.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. London, England: Guildford Press.
57.
PalmerT. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133-152.
58.
PapachristosA.MearesT.FaganJ. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhood in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223-272.
59.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63-84.
60.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 916-924.
61.
SeabrookJ. (2009, June22). Don’t shoot. The New Yorker, p. 32.
62.
ShermanL. W.GottfredsonD.MacKenzieD.EckJ.ReuterP.BushwayS. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising in criminal justice. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
63.
SkoganW. G.HartnettS. M.BumpN.DuboisJ. (2009). Evaluation of ceasefire-Chicago. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
64.
SmalleyS. (2009, February9). Always on my mind. Newsweek, p. 53.
65.
SnowC. C.HambrickD. C. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: Some theoretical and methodological problems. Academy of Management Review, 5, 527-538.
66.
SpieglerM. D.GuevremontD. C. (1998). Contemporary behaviour therapy (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
67.
TillyerM. S.KennedyD. M. (2008). Locating focused deterrence approaches within a situational crime prevention framework. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10, 75-84.
68.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
WalkerS. (1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice 1950-1990. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
WarrM. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17-40.
71.
WarrM. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183-216.
72.
WilsonD.BouffardL. A.MacKenzieD. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172-204.
