This study investigates the effect of the threat of legal sanctions on intentions to commit three types of offenses with a representative sample of 744 officially adjudicated youth with varying histories of offenses and gang involvement. In a departure from previous research, the authors find small severity effects for property crimes that are not negated by past offending experience, morality, or anticipated loss of respect from adults or peers. Gang members appear to be vulnerable to the effects of certainty of punishment for vehicle theft. These results challenge the current crime policy of increased reliance on punishment to deter gang crime but suggest that increasing gang members’ certainty of apprehension might hold some promise for reduction of some gang crime.
Bendixen, M., Endresen, I.M., & Olweus, D. ( 2003). Variety and frequency scales of antisocial involvement: Which one is better? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 135-150.
2.
California Legislative Analyst’s Office. ( 2002). Proposition 21. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.lao.ca.gov/initiatives/2000/21_03_2000.html
3.
Decker, S. ( 1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243-264.
4.
Decker, S. ( 2003). Policing gangs and youth violence. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
Decker, S., & Van Winkle, B. (1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Decker, S., Wright, R., & Logie, R. ( 1993). Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note. Criminology, 31, 135-147.
7.
Elliott, D.S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. ( 1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer.
8.
Esbensen, F., & Deschenes, E. ( 1998). A multisite examination of youth gang membership: Does gender matter? Criminology, 36, 799-827.
9.
Esbensen, F., & Huizinga, D. ( 1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth . Criminology, 31, 565-587.
10.
Esbensen, F., Osgood, D.W., Taylor, T.J., Peterson, D., & Freng, A. ( 2001). How great is G.R.E.A.T.? Results from the longitudinal quasi-experimental design. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 87-118.
11.
Esbensen, F., Winfree, L.T., Jr., He, N., & Taylor, T.J. ( 2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter?Crime and Delinquency, 47, 105-130
12.
Fleisher, M. ( 1998). Dead end kids: Gang girls and the boys they know. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
Foglia, W.D. ( 1997). Perceptual deterrence and the mediating effect of internalized norms among inner-city teenagers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 414-443.
14.
Gang Abatement and Prevention Act, S. 456 and H.R. 1582, 110th Cong. (2007)
15.
Grasmick, H.G., & Bryjak, G.J. ( 1980). The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment . Social Forces, 59, 471-491.
16.
Green, D.E. ( 1989a). The effect of sanction threat on self-reported drinking and driving behavior: A comparison of sampling procedures in perceptual deterrence research. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 17, 165-173.
17.
Green, D.E. ( 1989b). Measures of illegal behavior in individual level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 253-275.
18.
Greene, J., & Pranis, K. ( 2007). Gang wars: The failure of enforcement tactics and the need for effective public safety strategies. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
19.
Haynie, D.L. ( 2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter ? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057.
20.
Heckert, D.A., & Gondolf, E.W. ( 2000). The effect of perceptions of sanctions on batterer program outcomes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 369-391.
21.
Hennigan, K., Maxson, C., & Zhang, S. ( 2003). An implementation and outcome evaluation of the Youth and Family Accountability Model. California Board of Corrections. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
22.
Hennigan, K., Maxson, C., & Zhang, S. ( 2005). Self-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of a community-based multi-agency intensive supervision juvenile probation program ( Report to Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Hill, K., Howell, J., Hawkins, D., & Battin-Pearson, S. (1999, August). Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership. Results from the Seattle Social Development Project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 300-322.
24.
Katz, C., & Webb, V. ( 2006) Policing gangs in America. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Katz, C., Webb, V., & Decker, S. ( 2005). Using the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program to further understand the relationship between drug use and gang membership . Justice Quarterly, 22, 58-88.
26.
Klein, M. ( 1993). Attempting gang control by suppression: The misuse of deterrence principles. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention , 2, 88-111.
27.
Klein, M. ( 1995). The American street gang: Its nature, prevalence, and control. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Klein, M., & Maxson, C. ( 2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. ( 1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-746.
30.
Lanza-Kaduce, L. ( 1988). Perceptual deterrence and drinking and driving among college students. Criminology, 26, 321-341.
31.
Matsueda, R.L., Kreager, D.A., &. Huizinga, D. ( 2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71, 95-122.
32.
Maxson, C. ( 1998). Gang homicide: A review and extension of the literature . In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
Maxson, C., Hennigan, K., & Sloane, D. ( 2005). It’s getting crazy out there: Can a civil gang injunction change a community? Criminology and Public Policy , 4, 501-530.
34.
Moore, J., & Vigil, J.D. ( 1989). Chicano gangs: Group norms and individual factors related to adult criminality. Aztlan, 18, 31-42.
35.
Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1991). The preventive effects of the perceived risk of arrest: Testing an expanded conception of deterrence . Criminology, 29, 561-587.
36.
Nagin, D.S., & Pogarsky, G. ( 2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39, 865-891.
37.
National Youth Gang Center. (2008). Highlights of gang-related legislation. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.iir.com/nygc/gang%2Dlegis/highlightsgang-related-legislation.htm
38.
Paternoster, R. ( 1986). The use of composite scales in perceptual deterrence research: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 128-168.
39.
Paternoster, R. ( 1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-216.
40.
Paternoster, R. ( 1989) Absolute and restrictive deterrence in a panel of youth: Explaining the onset, persistence/desistance and frequency of delinquent offending . Social Problems, 36, 289-309.
41.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. ( 1986). The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A reexamination . Social Forces, 64, 751-777.
42.
Paternoster, R., Saltzman, L.E., Waldo, G.P., & Chiricos, T.G. (1983). Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? Law and Society Review , 17, 457-479.
43.
Piliavin, I., Thornton, C., Gartner, R., & Matsueda, R.C. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51, 101-119.
44.
Piquero, A., & Paternoster, R. (1998). An application of Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 3-37.
45.
Piquero, A., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., & Dean, C. ( 1999). Onset age and offense specialization. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 36, 275-299.
46.
Piquero, A., & Rengert, G.F. ( 1999). Studying deterrence with active residential burglars . Justice Quarterly, 16, 451-471.
47.
Pogarsky, G. ( 2002). Identifying "deterrable" offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19, 431-452.
48.
Pogarsky, G., Kim, K., & Paternoster, R. (2005). Perceptual change in the National Youth Survey: Lessons for deterrence theory and offender decision making. Justice Quarterly, 22, 1-17.
49.
Pratt, T.C., Cullen, F.T., Blevins, K.R., Daigle, L.E., & Madensen, T.D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 367-395). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
50.
Short, J.F., Jr., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, Ca. Penal Code, § 186.22 (1989).
52.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. C. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
53.
Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D., Lizotte, A.J., Smith, C.A., & Tobin, K. ( 2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. ( 1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
55.
Vigil, J.D. ( 1998). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in Southern California . Austin: University of Texas Press .
56.
Warr, M. ( 2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct . New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Warr, M., & Stafford, M. ( 1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, 851-866.
58.
Watkins, A., Huebner, B., & Decker, S. ( 2008). Patterns of gun acquisition, carrying and use among juvenile and adult arrestees: Evidence from a high-crime city. Justice Quarterly, 25, 674-700.
59.
Williams, K.R., & Hawkins, R. ( 1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law and Society Review, 20, 545-572.
60.
Wright, B.R.E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 180-213.
61.
Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G.J. ( 1973). Deterrence: The legal threat of crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
