Despite concerns whether supermaximum security prisons violate human rights or prove effective, these facilities have proliferated in America over the past 25 years. This punishment—aimed at the “worst of the worst” inmates and involving 23-hr-per-day single-cell confinement with few privileges or services—has emerged despite little evidence that the public supports it. Based on public opinion survey data, this study identified the extent to which support exists for supermax prisons and so tested three interrelated hypotheses about variation in public views. The focal contention is that support can be linked to groups that are most concerned with symbolic threats, to those most embracing of a belief in individual agency, and to those who have had negative contacts with offenders. The article concludes with a discussion on implications for theory, research, and policy.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2004). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
2.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 80-100.
3.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S.VenT. V. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38, 719-753.
4.
ApplegateB. K.DavisR. K. (2006). Public views on sentencing juvenile murderers: The impact of offender, offense, and perceived maturity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 55-74.
5.
ArbuckleJ.WothkeW. (1999). AMOS user’s guide. Chicago: Small Waters.
6.
BaldassarriD.BearmanP. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72, 784-811.
7.
BeckettK.SassonT. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
BeutelA. M.MariniM. M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60, 436-448.
9.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: John Wiley.
10.
BriggsC. S.SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41, 1341-1376.
11.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2005). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
BursteinP. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy?Social Forces, 77, 27-62.
13.
BursteinP. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29-40.
14.
CaplowT.SimonJ. (1999). Understanding prison policy and population trends. In TonryM. H.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 63-120). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 359-389.
16.
CloyesK. G.LovellD.AllenD. G.RhodesL. A. (2006). Assessment of psychosocial impairment in a supermaximum security unit sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 760-781.
17.
CohenP.CohenJ.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
CollinsW. C. (2004). Supermax prisons and the constitution: Liability concerns in the extended control unit. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
19.
ConoverT. (2000). Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing. New York: Random House.
20.
CrouchB. M.MarquartJ. W. (1989). An appeal to justice: Litigated reform of Texas prisons. Austin: University of Texas Press.
21.
CullenF. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43, 1-42.
22.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
23.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1-79.
24.
CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BrownS.MoonM. M.BlankenshipM. B.ApplegateB. K. (1998). Public support for early intervention programs: Implications for a progressive policy agenda. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 187-204.
25.
EllisonC. G.SherkatD. E. (1993). Conservative Protestantism and support for corporal punishment. American Sociological Review, 58, 131-144.
26.
ElsnerA. (2004). Gates of injustice: The crisis in America’s prisons. New York: Pearson.
27.
EvansJ. H. (2003). Have Americans’ attitudes become more polarized? An update. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 71-90.
28.
FergusonK. M.MindelC. H. (2007). Modeling fear of crime in Dallas neighborhoods: A test of social capital theory. Crime and Delinquency, 53, 322-349.
29.
FlanaganT. J.LongmireD. R. (Eds.). (1996). Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
GlazeL. E.BonczarT. P. (2006). Probation and parole in the United States, 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
33.
GrasmickH. G.CochranJ.BursikR. J.Jr.KimpelM. L. (1993). Religion, punitive justice, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 10, 289-314.
34.
HaneyC. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 124-156.
HurwitzJ.SmitheyS. (1998). Gender and differences on crime and punishment. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 89-115.
37.
IrwinJ. (2005). The warehouse prison. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
38.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T. (2004). Ideology, social threat, and the death sentence: Capital sentences across time and space. Social Forces, 83, 249-278.
39.
KingK.SteinerB.BreachS. R. (2008). Violence in the supermax: A self-fulfilling prophecy. The Prison Journal, 88, 144-168.
40.
KingR. D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem?Punishment and Society, 1, 163-186.
41.
KingR. D. (2005). The effects of supermax custody. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 118-145). Devon, UK: Willan.
42.
KromreyJ. D.Rendina-GobioffG. (2002). An empirical comparison of regression analysis strategies with discrete ordinal variables. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 28, 30-43.
43.
KurkiL.MorrisN. (2001). Supermax prisons. In TonryM. H. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 28, pp. 385-424). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
LibermanA. M. (2005). How much more likely? The implications of odds ratios for probabilities. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 253-266.
45.
LovellD. L.JohnsonC.CainK. C. (2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington state. Crime and Delinquency, 53, 633-656.
46.
McGarrellE. F.GiacomazziA.ThurmanQ. C. (1997). Neighborhood disorder, integration, and the fear of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 479-497.
47.
MearsD. P. (2005). A critical look at supermax prisons. Corrections Compendium, 30(6/7), 45-49.
48.
MearsD. P. (2008). An assessment of supermax prisons using an evaluation research framework. The Prison Journal, 88, 43-68.
49.
MearsD. P.ReisigM. D. (2006). The theory and practice of supermax prisons. Punishment and Society, 8, 33-57.
50.
MearsD. P.WatsonJ. (2006). Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, 23, 232-270.
51.
MillerN. D. (1995). International protection of the rights of prisoners: Is solitary confinement in the United States a violation of international standards?California Western International Law Journal, 26, 139-172.
52.
MoonM. M.SundtJ.CullenF. T.WrightJ. P. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 38-60.
53.
MoonM. M.WrightJ. P.CullenF. T.PealerJ. (2000). Putting kids to death: Specifying public support for juvenile capital punishment. Justice Quarterly, 17, 663-684.
54.
MorrisN.RothmanD. J. (Eds.). (1995). The Oxford history of the prison. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
MullenB.HuL. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
56.
NadayA.FreilichJ. D.MellowJ. (2008). The elusive data on supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 88, 69-93.
57.
Pew Research Center. (2004). Survey experiment shows polls face growing resistance, but still representative. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
PizarroJ. M.NaragR. E. (2008). Supermax prisons: What we know, what we do not know, and where we are going. The Prison Journal, 88, 23-42.
59.
PizarroJ.SteniusV. M. K. (2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84, 248-264.
60.
PizarroJ.SteniusV. M. K.PrattT. C. (2006). Supermax prisons: Myths, realities, and the politics of punishment in American society. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 6-21.
61.
RhodesL. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
62.
RivelandC. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
63.
RobertsJ. V.HoughM. (2005). The state of the prisons: Exploring public knowledge and opinion. The Howard Journal, 44, 286-306.
64.
RobertsJ. V.StalansL. J. (1998). Crime, criminal justice, and public opinion. In TonryM. H. (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 31-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
RoofW. C.McKinneyW. (1987). American mainline religion: Its changing shape and future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
66.
RossiP. H. (1997). Advances in quantitative evaluation, 1987–1996. New Directions in Evaluation, 76, 57-68.
67.
RossiP. H.BerkR. A. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York: Aldine.
68.
RothmanD. J. (1995). Perfecting the prison: United States, 1789–1865. In MorrisN.RothmanD. J. (Eds.), The Oxford history of the prison (pp. 111-129). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69.
SabolW. J.CoutureH.HarrisonP. M. (2007). Prisoners in 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
70.
SigelmanL.WelchS. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black–White interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71, 781-795.
71.
SilviaP. J. (2003). Throwing away the key: Measuring prison reform attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2553-2564.
72.
SkoganW. G. (1995). Reactions to crime and violence. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 9-13.
73.
SmithT. W. (1984). The polls: Gender and attitudes toward violence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 384-396.
74.
SmithT. W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225-245.
75.
SprottJ. B. (1999). Are members of the public tough on crime? The dimensions of public “punitiveness.”Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 467-474.
76.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment costs of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
77.
StuckyT. D.HeimerK.LangJ. B. (2007). A bigger piece of the pie? State corrections spending and the politics of social order. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 91-123.
78.
SunsteinC. R. (2000). Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes. Yale Law Journal, 110, 71-119.
79.
TaylorD. G.ScheppeleK. L.StinchcombeA. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26, 413-424.
80.
TochH. (2001). The future of supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 81, 376-388.
81.
TochH. (2003). The contemporary relevance of early experiments with supermax reform. The Prison Journal, 83, 221-228.
82.
TourangeauR. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775-802.
83.
TylerT. R.BoeckmannR. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237-266.
84.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2006). Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 169-197.
85.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2007). Reassessing the racial divide in support for capital punishment: The continuing significance of race. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 124-158.
86.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006a). 2005 American community survey. Washington, DC: Author.
87.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006b). 2005 population estimates (Data Set No. GCT-T1-R). Washington, DC: Author.
88.
UseemB.PiehlA. M. (2006). Prison buildup and disorder. Punishment and Society, 8, 87-115.
89.
WannerR. A.CaputoT. C. (1987). Punitiveness, fear of crime, and perceptions of violence. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 12, 331-344.
90.
WardD. A.WerlichT. G. (2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment and Society, 5, 53-75.
91.
WebbG. L.MorrisD. G. (2002). Working as a prison guard. In GrayT. (Ed.), Exploring corrections (pp. 69-83). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
92.
WeisbergH. F.KrosnickJ. A.BowenB. D. (1989). An introduction to survey research and data analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
93.
WordenA. P. (1993). The attitudes of women and men in policing: Testing conventional and contemporary wisdom. Criminology, 31, 203-241.
94.
YoungR. L.ThompsonC. Y. (1995). Religious fundamentalism, punitiveness, and firearms ownership. Journal of Crime and Justice, 18, 81-98.
