The Provision and Completion of Gender-Specific Services for Girls on Probation

Abstract

Beginning in the late 1980s, the number of girls entering the juvenile justice system increased dramatically. Although historically girls had entered the justice system with status offenses, recent examinations suggest a sharp rise in the number of girls charged with more serious crimes. Researchers and policy makers have increasingly acknowledged the need for a gender-specific approach, which has prompted the development of gender-responsive theories, strategies, and programming to specifically address female delinquency. This article focuses on an evaluation of a gender-specific intervention and examines factors that contribute to its efficacy. More specifically, the current article explores the provision and completion of services by girls in the Reaffirming Young Sisters' Excellence Program, paying particular attention to variations by race and ethnicity.

Keywords

gender-specific services juvenile justice girls' programming girls of color traditional probation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom, B. , Owen, B. , & Covington, S. (2005). Gender-responsive strategies for women offenders: A summary of research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. NIC accession no. 020418. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Are girls closing the gender gap in violence? Criminal Justice Magazine, 16, 1.

Chesney-Lind, M. , & Irwin, K. (2008). Beyond bad girls: Gender, violence and hype. New York: Routledge.

Chesney-Lind, M. , Morash, M. , & Stevens T. (2008). Girls' troubles, girls' delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 162-189.

Chesney-Lind, M. , & Shelden, R.G. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.

Goodkind, S. (2005). Gender-specific services in the juvenile justice system: A critical examination. Affilia, 20(1), 52-70.

Greene, Peters , & Associates. (1998, October). Guiding principles for promising female programming. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Hartney, C. , & Silva, F. (2007). And justice for some: Differential treatment of youth of color in the justice system. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

Holsinger, K. , Belknap, J. , & Sutherland, J.L. (1999). Assessing the gender specific program and service needs for adolescent females in the juvenile justice system . Columbus, OH: Office of Criminal Justice Studies.

10.

Kempf-Leonard, K. , & Sample, L.L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is gender-specific treatment warranted? Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 89-129.

11.

Le, T. , Arifuku, I. , & Nunez, M. (2003) Girls and culture in delinquency intervention: A case study of RYSE. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 54, 25-34.

12.

National Council on Crime and Delinquency. ( 2001, December). Evaluation of the RYSE Program: Alameda County Probation Department. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Available at http://www.nccd-crc.org/nccd/pubs/2001dec_ryse_report.pdf.

13.

Schaffner, L. (2006). Girls in trouble with the law. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

14.

Snyder, H.N. , & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.