Policy makers and juvenile justice officials express alarm over the rise in arrests of girls for simple and aggravated assault. Others see this perceived increase as an artifact of decreased public tolerance for violence, changes in parental attitudes or law enforcement policies, or heightened surveillance of domestic violence, which disproportionately affects girls. The author contends that the social construction of girls' violence may reflect policy changes in the juvenile justice system itself, especially the deinstitutionalization of status offenders. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act deinstitutionalization mandates encouraged “bootstrapping” or “relabeling” female status offenders as delinquents to retain access to facilities in which to confine “incorrigible” girls. The author analyzes data on changes in arrest patterns and confinement for boys and girls charged with simple and aggravated assault, arguing that differences in rates, victims, and confinement for “violent” boys and girls support a relabeling interpretation of the supposed rise in girls' violence consistent with the social construction thesis.
Acoca, L. (1999). Investing in girls: A 21st century strategy. Juvenile Justice, 6, 3-13.
2.
Acoca, L., & Dedel, K. (1998). No place to hide: Understanding and meeting the needs of girls in the California juvenile justice system. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
American Bar Association & National Bar Association. (2001). Justice by gender: The lack of appropriate prevention, diversion and treatment alternatives for girls in the justice system. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
5.
Artz, S. (1998). Sex, power, and the violent school girl. Toronto, Canada: Trifolium.
6.
Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C. (1992). Gender bias in juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP Act. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 1162-1186.
7.
Bloom, B., Owne, B., Deschenes, E.P., & Rosenbaum, J. (2002). Improving juvenile justice for females: A statewide assessment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 4, 526-552.
8.
Blumstein, A. (1996). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 10-36.
9.
Blumstein, A. (2000). Disaggregating the violence trends. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 13-44). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bond-Maupin, L., Maupin, J.R., & Leisenring, A. (2002). Girls' delinquency and the justice implications of intake workers' perspectives. Women & Criminal Justice, 13, 51-77.
11.
Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis. ( 1999). Report on arrests for domestic violence in California, 1998. Criminal Justice Statistics Center Report Series, 1(2), 5-6.
12.
Castallano, Thomas C. (1986). The justice model in the juvenile justice system: Washington state's experience. Law and Policy, 8, 397-418.
13.
Chesney-Lind, M.1977. Paternalism and the female status offender. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 121-130.
14.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Girls and status offenses: Is juvenile justice still sexist? Criminal Justice Abstracts, 20, 144-165.
15.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 81-90.
16.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Belknap, M. (2004). Trends in delinquent girls' aggression and violent behavior: A review of the evidence. In M. Puytallaz & P. Bierman (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 203-222). New York: Guilford .
17.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. (1997). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
19.
Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Irwin, K. (2007). Policing girlhood? Relational aggression and violence prevention. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 328-345.
20.
Community Research Associates. (1998). Juvenile female offenders: A status of the states report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
Corley, C.J., Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. (1989). Sex and the likelihood of sanction. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80, 540-556.
22.
Costello, J.C., & Worthington, N.L. (1981). Incarcerating status offenders: Attempts to circumvent the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act . Harvard Civil Rights- Civil Liberties Law Review, 16, 41-81.
23.
Curran, D.J. (1984). The myth of the "new" female delinquent. Crime & Delinquency, 30, 386-399.
24.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). Uniform crime reports: Crime in the United States 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
25.
Federle, K.H. (2000). The institutionalization of female delinquency . Buffalo Law Review, 48, 881-908.
26.
Federle, K.H., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1992). Special issues in juvenile justice: Gender, race, and ethnicity. In I. Schwartz (Ed.), Juvenile justice and public policy: Toward a national agenda (pp. 165-195). New York: Lexington.
27.
Feld, B.C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Feld, B.C. (2003). Race, politics, and juvenile justice: The Warren court and the conservative "backlash." Minnesota Law Review , 87, 1447-1577.
29.
Feld, B.C. (2004). Cases and materials on juvenile justice administration (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
30.
Feld, B.C. (2009). Girls in the juvenile justice system. In M. Zahn (Ed.), The delinquent girl. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
Franke, T.M., Huynh-Hohnbaum, A.-L.T., & Chung, Y. (2002). Adolescent violence: With whom they fight and where. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 11(3-4), 133-158.
32.
Gaarder, E., Rodriguez, N., & Zatz, M.S. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21, 547-578.
33.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Girls Inc. (1996). Prevention and parity: Girls in juvenile justice. Indianapolis, IN : Author.
35.
Handler, J. F., & Zatz, J. (Eds.). (1982). Neither angels nor thieves: Studies in deinstitutionalization of status offenders. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36.
Hoyt, S., & Scherer, D.G. (1998). Female juvenile delinquency: Misunderstood by the juvenile justice system, neglected by social science. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 81-107.
37.
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
38.
Johnson, D.R., & Scheuble, L.K. (1991). Gender bias in the disposition of juvenile court referrals: The effects of time and location. Criminology, 29, 677-699.
39.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Johansson, P. (2007). Gender and runaways: Risk factors, delinquency, and juvenile justice experiences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 308-327.
40.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L.L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is gender-specific treatment warranted? Justice Quarterly, 17, 89-128.
41.
Kluger, J. (2006). Taming wild girls. Time, 167(18), 54-55.
42.
Krause, W., & McShane, M.D. (1994). A deinstitutionalization retrospective: Relabeling the status offender. Journal of Crime and Justice, 17, 45-67.
43.
Krisberg, B., Schwartz, I., Lisky, P., & Austin, J. (1986). The watershed of juvenile justice reform. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 5-38.
44.
MacDonald, J.M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency , 47, 173-195.
45.
Mahoney, A.R., & Fenster, C. (1982). Female delinquents in a suburban court. In N. H. Rafter & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles and criminal justice (pp. 221-236). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
46.
Maxson, C.L., & Klein, M.W. (1997). Responding to troubled youth. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
McCord, J., Widom, C.S., & Crowell, N.A. (2001). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48.
Miller, S.L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women's violence in relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
National Center for Juvenile Justice. (2008 , October 24). Juvenile arrest rates by offense, sex, and race . Available at http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/crime/excel/jar_2007.xls
50.
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. ( 1975). Jurisdiction over status offenders should be removed from the juvenile court: A policy statement. Crime & Delinquency , 21, 97-99.
51.
Platt, A.M. (1977). The child-savers: The invention of delinquency . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Poulin, A.B. (1996). Female delinquents: Defining their place in the justice system. Wisconsin Law Review, 1996 , 541-575.
53.
Rothman, D. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternative in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
54.
Russ, H.2004. The war on catfights. City Limits, February, 19-22.
55.
Ryerson, E. (1978). The best-laid plans: America's juvenile court experiment. New York: Hill & Wang.
56.
Sanders, J. (2005, June 23). How to defuse "girl on girl" violence . Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0623/p09s01-coop.html
57.
Scelfo, J. (2004). Bad girls go wild: A rise in girl-on-girl violence is making headlines nationwide and prompting scientists to ask why. Newsweek. Available at http://www.newsweek.com/id/50082
58.
Schaffner, L. (1998). Female juvenile delinquency: Sexual solutions, gender bias, and juvenile justice. Hastings Women's Law Journal , 9, 1-25.
59.
Schlossman, S.L. (1977). Love and the American delinquent: The theory and practice of "progressive" juvenile justice 1825-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Schlossman, S.L., & Wallach, S. (1978). The crime of precocious sexuality: Female juvenile delinquency in the progressive era. Harvard Educational Review , 48, 655-694.
61.
Schneider, A.L. (1984). Divesting status offenses from juvenile court jurisdiction. Crime & Delinquency, 30, 347-370.
62.
Schwartz, I.M. (1989). (In)justice for juveniles: Rethinking the best interests of the child. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
63.
Schwartz, I.M., Steketee, M.W., & Schneider, V.W. (1990). Federal juvenile justice policy and the incarceration of girls. Crime & Delinquency , 36, 511-520.
64.
Schwartz, I.M., Weiner, N.A., & Enosh, G. (1998). Nine lives and then some: Why the juvenile court does not roll over and die. Wake Forest Law Review, 33, 533-552.
65.
Sickmund, M., Sladky, T.J., & Kang, W. (2005) Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement databook . Available at http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/cjrp/
66.
Snyder, H. (2000). Challenging the myths. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
67.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
68.
Steffensmeier, D. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960-1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 411-441.
69.
Steffensmeier, D., Schwartz, J., Zhong, S.H., & Ackerman, J. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls' violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing? Criminology, 43, 355-405.
70.
Sussman, A. (1977). Sex-based discrimination and PINS jurisdiction . In L. E. Teitelbaum & A. R. Gough (Eds.), Beyond control: Status offenders in the juvenile court (pp. 179-199). Cambridge, MA : Ballinger.
71.
Sutton, J. (1988). Stubborn children: Controlling delinquency in the United Sates, 1640-1981. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
Tanenhaus, D.S. (2004). Juvenile justice in the making. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
Teilman, K.S., & Landry, P.H., Jr. (1981). Gender bias in juvenile justice . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 47-80.
74.
Tonry, M. (2004). Thinking about crime: Sense and sensibility in American penal culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991). Noncriminal juveniles: Detentions have been reduced but better monitoring is needed. Washington, DC: Author .
76.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). Minimal gender bias occurred in processing noncriminal juveniles. Washington, DC: Author.
77.
Williams, C. (2004, December 28). Where sugar and spice meet bricks and bats. The Washington Post, p. B01.
78.
Zimring, F.E. (1998). American youth violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
Zimring, F.E. (2002). The common thread: Diversion in juvenile justice . California Law Review, 88, 2477-2495.
80.
Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G. (1997). Crime is not the problem: Lethal violence in America . New York: Oxford University Press .
