Past research has shown that racial inequality in urban areas—Black and White residential segregation and economic inequality—is associated with increased levels of homicide offending and that victimization among Blacks yet serves as a protection mechanism against such violence among Whites. However, few studies have considered alternative measures of violence, namely nonfatal violent victimization in the study of racial inequality in urban areas. This oversight is problematic, given that although some scholars suggest that homicide is a reliable indicator of all forms of violence in general, victimization reports often point to qualitative differences in lethal and nonlethal forms of violence. Consequently, this research examines the link between city-level White and Black residential segregation and economic inequality and individual risks for nonfatal violent victimization net of individual-level factors that have also been associated with such risks. The data are disaggregated by race, because White and Black residential segregation and economic inequality are believed to have disparate effects on non-Hispanic Whites’ and non-Hispanic Blacks’ risks. Overall, the findings indicate that both forms of racial inequality function to protect Whites from nonfatal violent victimization but concomitantly increase such risks among Blacks. The implications of these findings and areas of future research are also discussed.
Anderson, E. ( 1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Anderson, E. ( 1999). The code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.
3.
Blau, J.R., & Blau, P.M. ( 1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 114-129.
4.
Blau, P.M. ( 1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1975a). Criminal victimization surveys in the nation’s five largest cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1975b). Criminal victimization surveys in thirteen American cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1978). Criminal victimization surveys in eight American cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
Cantor, D., & Lynch, J.P. ( 2000). Self-report surveys as measures of crime and criminal victimization. Criminal Justice, 4, 85-138.
9.
Catalano, S.M. ( 2005). Criminal victimization, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
Catalano, S.M. ( 2006). Criminal victimization, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Crutchfield, R.D. ( 1989). Labor stratification and violent crime. Social Forces, 68(2), 489-512.
12.
Felson, R.B., & Messner, S.F. ( 1996). To kill or not to kill? Lethal outcomes in injurious attacks. Criminology, 34, 519-545.
13.
Fischer, C.S., Stockmayer, G., Stiles, J., & Hout, M. ( 2004). Geographic levels and social dimensions of metropolitan segregation. Demography, 41(1), 1-22.
14.
Harer, M.D., & Steffensmeier, D. (1992). The differing effects of economic inequality on Black and White rates of violence. Social Forces, 68(2), 1035-1054.
15.
Hoffmann, J.P., & Johnson, R. ( 2000). Multilevel influences on school disorder: A comment on Welsh, Greene and Jenkins. Criminology, 38(4), 801-814.
16.
Hox, J.J., & Maas, C.J.M. ( 2002). Sample sizes for multilevel modeling. In J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, & P. Schmidt (Eds.), Social science methodology in the new millennium: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology [CD-ROM]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich Verlag.
17.
Jargowsky, P.A. ( 1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage.
18.
King, G., & Zeng, L. ( 2001a). Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organization, 55, 693-715.
19.
King, G., & Zeng, L. ( 2001b). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137-163.
20.
Klaus, P., & Rennison, C.M. (2002). Age patterns in violent victimization, 1976-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
Krivo, L.J., & Peterson, R.D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75, 619-649.
22.
Krivo, L.J., & Peterson, R.D. (2000). The structural context of homicide: Accounting for racial differences in process. American Sociological Review, 65, 547-559.
23.
Lauritsen, J.L. ( 2003). Juvenile victims of violence: Individual, family, and community factors (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bulletin) . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24.
Laurtisen, J.L., & White, N. ( 2001). Putting violence in its place: The influence of race, ethnicity, gender, and place on violent victimization. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 37-60.
25.
Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research. (2001). Ethnic diversity grows, neighborhood integration lags behind. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from www.albany.edu/mumford/census.
26.
Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J., & Farley, R. ( 2004). Segregation of minorities in the metropolis. Demography, 41(1), 1-22.
27.
Massey, D.S. ( 1990). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. American Journal of Sociology, 96(2), 329-357.
28.
Massey, D.S. ( 1995). Getting away with murder: Segregation and violent crime in urban America. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, 1203-1232.
29.
Massey, D.S., & Denton, N.A. ( 1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Massey, D.S., & Eggers, M.L. ( 1990). The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970-1980. American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1153-1188.
31.
McNulty, T.L. ( 2001). Assessing the race-violence relationship at the macro level: The assumption of racial invariance and the problem of restricted distributions . Criminology, 39, 467-489.
32.
McNulty, T.L., & Bellair, P.E. ( 2003). Explaining racial and ethnic differences in serious adolescent violent behavior. Criminology, 41(3), 709-748.
33.
Merry, S.E. ( 1981). Urban danger: Life in a neighborhood of strangers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
34.
Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak.
35.
Messner, S.F. ( 1982). Poverty, inequality and the urban homicide rate: Some unexpected findings. Criminology, 21, 103-114.
36.
Messner, S.F., & Golden, R.M. ( 1992). Racial inequality and racially disaggregated homicide rates: An assessment of alternative theoretical explanations. Criminology, 30, 421-447.
37.
Messner, S.F., & South, S.J. ( 1986). Economic deprivation, opportunity structure, and robbery victimization: Intra- and interracial patterns. Social Forces , 64(4), 975-991.
38.
Morenoff, J.D., & Sampson, R.J. ( 1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970-1990. Social Forces, 76, 31-64.
39.
Pattillo, M.E. ( 1998). Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Managing crime in a Black middle class neighborhood. Social Forces, 76(3), 747-774.
40.
Pattillo, M.E. ( 2007). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Pattillo-McCoy, M.E. ( 1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Peterson, R.D., & Krivo, L.J. ( 1993). Racial segregation and Black urban homicide. Social Forces, 71(4), 1001-1026.
43.
Peterson, R.D., & Krivo, L.J. ( 1999). Racial segregation, the concentration of disadvantage, and Black and White homicide victimization. Sociological Forum , 14(3), 465-493.
44.
Peterson, R.D., Krivo, L.J., & Browning, C.R. (2006). Segregation and racial/ethnic inequality in crime: New directions. In F. Cullen, J. Wright, & Kristie Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 169-187). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
45.
Rennison, Callie M. and Michael Planty ( 2006). Reassessing who contributed most to the decline in violence in the 1990s: A reminder that size DOES matter. Violence and Victims, 21, 1.
46.
Sampson, R.J. ( 1987). Urban Black violence: The effect of male joblessness and family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 348-382.
47.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. ( 1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 5328.
48.
Sampson, R.J., & Wilson, W.J. ( 1995). Toward a theory of race, crime and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37-54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
Shaw, C.R., & McKay, H.D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Shihadeh, E.S., & Flynn, N. ( 1996). Segregation and crime: The effect of Black social isolation on the rates of Black urban violence. Social Forces, 74(4), 1325-1352.
51.
Shihadeh, E.S., & Ousey, G. ( 1998). Metropolitan expansion and Black social dislocation: The link between suburbanization and center city crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 651-666.
52.
Shihadeh, E.S., & Steffensmeier, D.J. (1994). Economic inequality, family disruption and urban Black violence: Cities as units of stratification and social control. Social Forces, 73(2), 729-751.
Skogan, W. ( 1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.
55.
Smith, S.K., Steadman, G.W., Minton, T.D., & Townsend, M. ( 1998). Criminal victimization and perceptions of community safety in 12 United States cities, 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
56.
StataCorp. (2005). Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.2. College Station, TX: Author.
57.
Whyte, W. ( 1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Wilson, W.J. ( 1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Wilson, W.J. ( 1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor . New York: Random House.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
