Previous studies examining how gender structures women’s opportunities to engage in the street-level drug economy have provided insight into the changing nature of illicit drug markets and women’s roles within this illegitimate economy. Using national data from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring program, this study adds to the existing body of research by examining drug market acquisition behaviors and how such drug activity differs by gender. The findings indicate that male and female arrestees use different strategies when obtaining drugs. Specifically, women appear to rely on a more limited array of social contacts than men when acquiring drugs. The results also reveal that the effect of gender on efforts to obtain drugs is not constant across drug types. This study suggests that the strategies used by women when obtaining drugs may very well reflect the gendered culture of street-level drug markets and the influence of personal relationships on women’s involvement in criminal activity.
Adler, P. ( 1993). Wheeling and dealing: An ethnography of an upper-level drug dealing and smuggling community. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Alarid, L., Marquart, J., Burton, V., Cullen, F., & Cuvelier, J. ( 1996). Women’s roles in serious offenses: A study of adult felons. Justice Quarterly, 13, 431-454.
3.
Blau, P.M. ( 1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press .
4.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. ( 2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
5.
Coomber, R. ( 2003). There’s no such thing as a free lunch: How "freebies" and "credit" operate as part of rational drug market activity. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 940-962.
6.
Curtis, R., & Wendel, T. ( 2000). Toward the development of a typology of illegal drug markets. In R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 11, pp. 121-152). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
7.
Daly, K. ( 1997). Different ways of conceptualizing sex/gender in feminist theory and their implications for criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 25-51.
8.
Davis, W.R., Johnson, B.D., Randolph, D., & Liberty, H. ( 2005). Gender differences in the distribution of cocaine and heroin in central Harlem. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , 77, 115-127.
9.
Denton, B. ( 2001). Dealing: Women in the drug economy. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press .
10.
Denton, B., & O’Malley, P. (1999). Gender, trust and business: Women drug dealers in the illicit economy. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 513-530.
11.
Dunlap, E., Johnson, B.D., & Maher, L. ( 1997). Female crack sellers in New York City: Who they are and what they do. Woman and Criminal Justice, 8, 25-55.
12.
Eck, J. ( 1995). A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces . In J. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place, crime prevention studies (Vol. 4, pp. 67-93). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
13.
Erickson, P., Butters, J., McGillicuddy, P., & Hallgren, A. ( 2000). Crack and prostitution: Gender, myths, and experiences . Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 767-788.
14.
Fagan, J. ( 1994). Women and drugs revisited: Female participation in the cocaine economy. Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 179-227.
15.
Fischer, C. ( 1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
Fischer, C., & Oliker, S. ( 1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle . Social Forces, 62, 124-132.
17.
Friedman, S., Neaigus, A., Jose, B., Curtis, R., & Des Jarlais, D. (1998). Networks and HIV risk: An introduction to social network analysis for harm reductionists. International Journal of Drug Policy, 9, 461-469.
18.
Gerstel, N. ( 1988). Divorce, gender and social integration. Gender and Society, 2, 343-367.
19.
Griffin, M., & Armstrong, G. ( 2003). The effect of local life circumstances on female probationer offending. Justice Quarterly, 20, 213-239.
20.
Harrison, P.M., & Beck, J.A. ( 2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics bulletin: Prisoners in 2005 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
Hunt, D., & Rhodes, W. ( 2001). Methodology guide for ADAM. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Inciardi, J., Lockwood, D., & Pottieger, A. ( 1993). Women and crack cocaine. New York : Macmillan.
23.
James, S., Johnson, J., & Raghaven, C. ( 2004). I couldn’t go anywhere. Violence Against Women, 10, 991-1014.
24.
Johnson, B.D., & Natarajan, M. ( 1994). Crack abusers and noncrack abusers: Profiles of drug use, drug sales and nondrug criminality. Journal of Drug Issues , 24, 117-142.
25.
Koester, S., & Schwartz, J. ( 1993). Crack, gangs, sex, and powerlessness: A view from Denver . In M. S. Ratner (Ed.), Crack pipe as pimp: An ethnographic investigation of sex-for-crack exchanges (pp. 189-190). New York: Lexington .
26.
Latkin, C., Mandell, W., Oziemkowska, M., Celentano, D., Vlahov, D., Ensminger, M., et al. (1995). Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 38, 1-9.
27.
Maher, L. ( 1997). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. New York: Clarendon .
28.
Maher, L., & Curtis, R. ( 1992). Women on the edge of crime: Crack cocaine and the changing contexts of street-level sex work in New York City. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 18, 221-258.
29.
Maher, L., & Daly K. ( 1996). Women in the street-level drug economy: Continuity or change? Criminology, 34, 465-491.
30.
Marsden, P. ( 1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122-131.
31.
Maxwell, S., & Maxwell, C. ( 2000). Examining the "criminal careers" of prostitutes within the nexus of drug use, drug selling, and other illicit activities. Criminology, 38, 787-809.
32.
Miller, E. ( 1986). Street woman. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
33.
Molm, L. ( 2001). Theories of social exchange and exchange networks . In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (Eds.), The handbook of social theory (pp. 260-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
Moore, G. ( 1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55, 726-735.
35.
Morgan, P., & Joe, K. ( 1996). Citizens and outlaws: The private lives and public life-styles of women in the illicit drug economy. Journal of Drug Issues , 26, 125-141.
36.
Mullins, C., & Wright, R. ( 2003). Gender, social networks, and residential burglary . Criminology, 41, 813-840.
37.
Murphy, S., & Arroyo, K. ( 2000). Women as judicious consumers of drug markets. In R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 11, pp. 101-120). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
38.
Murphy S., Waldorf, D., & Reinarman, C. ( 1991). Drifting into dealing: Becoming a cocaine seller . Qualitative Sociology, 13, 321-343.
39.
Myhre, M. ( 2000). Drug market precipitators: Situational dynamics of open-air drug markets in public housing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
40.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2002 ). Pulse check: Trends in drug abuse. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
41.
Peterson, R.D., Krivo, L.J., & Hagan, J. ( 2006). A deeper understanding of race, ethnicity, and crime, and criminal justice. In R. D. Peterson , L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime (pp. 357-367). New York: New York University Press.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks : SAGE.
44.
Rice, E., Milburn, N., Rotheram-Borus, M., Mallett, S., & Rosenthal, D. ( 2005). The effects of peer group network properties on drug use among homeless youth. American Behavioral Scientist , 48, 1102-1123.
45.
Riley, K. ( 1997). Crack, powder cocaine, and heroin: Drug purchase and use patterns in six U.S. cities. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
46.
Rodriguez, N., & Griffin, M.L. ( 2005). Gender differences in drug market activities: A comparative assessment of men and women’s participation in the drug market, p. 151. ( Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Grant #2004-IJ-CX-0014).
47.
Rodriguez, N., Katz, C., Webb, V., & Schaefer, D. ( 2005). Examining the impact of individual, community, and market factors on methamphetamine use: A tale of two cities. Journal of Drug Issues, 35(4), 665-694.
48.
Rosenbaum, M. ( 1981). Women on heroin. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press.
49.
Sampson, R.J., & Wilson, W.J. ( 1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality . In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (p. 37-54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
50.
Schensul, J., & Burkholder, G. (2005). Vulnerability, social networks, sites, and selling as predictors of drug use among urban African American and Puerto Rican emerging adults. Journal of Drug Issues, 2, 379-408.
51.
Sommers, I., & Baskin, D. ( 1996). The structural relationship between drug use, drug dealing, and other income support activities among women drug sellers . Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 975-1007.
52.
Steffensmeier, D. ( 1983). Organization properties and sex-segregation in the underworld: Building a sociological theory of sex differences in crime . Social Forces, 61, 1010-1032.
53.
Steffensmeier, D., & Ulmer, J. ( 2005). Confessions of a dying thief. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
54.
Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S.J. (2002). A multilevel analysis of the effect of cocaine price on cocaine use among arrestees. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 185-195.
55.
Wellman, B. ( 1985). Domestic work, paid work and net work. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 159-191). London: SAGE.
56.
Wilson, N.K. ( 1993). Stealing and dealing: The drug war and gendered criminal opportunity. In C. Culliver (Ed.), Female criminality: The state of the art (pp. 169-194). New York: Garland.
