A central proposition of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) General Theory of Crime is the relative stability of low self-control, however research on “selfcontrol strength” suggests that it may vary across contexts. The current study examines these differing conceptions by randomly assigning participants to one of two sexual arousal conditions or to a no-arousal condition. Group differences in the six components of self control, as captured on the Grasmick et al. (1993) scale were then examined. Unexpectedly, individuals in the most intense arousal condition actually reported higher self-control than those in the other conditions (both in absolute value and in changes in relative rank within the sample). Such findings provide additional empirical support for the recent conceptualization of self-control strength as a personal characteristic that can be both exercised and potentially depleted when overused.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87-98.
2.
ArneklevB. J.CochranJ. K.GaineyR. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107-127.
3.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
EvansT. D.CullenF. T.BurtonV. S. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology, 35, 475-504
6.
GibbsJ. J.GeiverD. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 12, 231-256.
7.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1995). National crime control policies. Society, 32, 30-36.
9.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
10.
HayC.ForrestW. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739-774.
11.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
12.
KeaneC.MaximP. S.TeevanJ. J. (1993). Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: Testing a general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 3-46.
13.
LoewensteinG.NaginD.PaternosterR. (1997). The effect of sexual arousal on predictions of sexual forcefulness. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 32, 443-473.
14.
LongshoreD.TurnerS.SteinJ. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
15.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
16.
MuravenM.CollinsR. L.ShiffmanS.PatyJ. A. (2005). Daily fluctuations in self-control demands and alcohol intake. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 140-147.
17.
MuravenM.PogarskyG.ShmueliD. (2006). Self-control depletion and the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 263-277.
18.
PaternosterR.BrameB. (1998). Structural similarity of processes generating criminal and analogous behaviors. Criminology, 36, 633-666.
19.
PiqueroA. R.BouffardJ. A. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24, 1-26.
20.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s Self-Control Scale. Criminology, 38, 897-930.
21.
PiqueroA. R.RosayA. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.’s Self-Control Scale: A comment on Longshore et al. Criminology, 36, 157-174.
22.
PrattT. C. (forthcoming). Reconsidering Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Linking the micro- and macro-level sources of self-control and criminal behavior over the life course. In SavageJ. (Ed)., The development of persistent criminality. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
24.
SaltzR. F. (1987). The roles of bars and restaurants in preventing alcohol-impaired driving: An evaluation of server intervention. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 10, 5-27.
25.
TittleC. R.WardD. A.GrasmickH. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333-365.
26.
TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457-471.
