This study examines the proximity of service providers to recently released parolees in California over a 2-year period (2005-2006). The addresses of parolee residences and service providers are geocoded, and the number of various types of service providers within 2 miles (3.2 km) of a parolee are measured. “Potential demand” is measured as the number of parolees within 2 miles of a provider. Although racial and ethnic minority parolees have more service providers nearby, these providers appear to be particularly impacted based on potential demand. It is also found that the parolees arguably most in need of social services—those who have spent more time in correctional institutions, have been convicted of more serious or violent crimes in their careers, or are sex offenders—live near fewer social services, or the providers near them appear impacted.
Allard, S.W. ( 2004). Access to social services: The changing urban geography of poverty and service provision. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Allard, S.W., & Danziger, S. ( 2003). Proximity and opportunity: How residence and race affect the employment of welfare recipients. Housing Policy Debate , 13, 675-700.
3.
Allard, S.W., Tolman, R.M., & Rosen, D. ( 2003). Proximity to service providers and service utilization among welfare recipients: The interaction of place and race. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 599-613.
Anderson, R.M. ( 1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 36, 1-10.
6.
Anglin, M., Prendergast, M., Farabee, D., & Cartier, J. ( 2002). Final report on the Substance Abuse Program at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (SATF-SAP) and state prison at Corcoran . Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections, Office Substance Abuse Programs.
7.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. ( 2002). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections.
8.
Blumenberg, E., & Manville, M. ( 2004). Beyond the spatial mismatch: Welfare recipients and transportation policy. Journal of Planning Literature, 19, 182-205.
9.
Blumenberg, E., & Ong, P. ( 1998). Job accessibility and welfare usage: Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 639-657.
10.
Bouffard, J.A., Mackenzie, D.L., & Hickman, L.J. ( 2000). Effectiveness of vocational education and employment programs for adult offenders: A methodology-based analysis of the literature . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 1-41.
11.
Brameld, K.J., & Holman, C.D.J. (2006). The effect of locational disadvantage on hospital utilisation and outcomes in Western Australia. Health & Place, 12, 490-502.
12.
Byrne, J.M., Taxman, F.S., & Young, D. ( 2002). Emerging roles and responsibilities in the reentry partnership initiative: New ways of doing business. Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
13.
California Coalition AgainstSexual Assault. ( 2006). Proposition 83 CALCASA position paper. Sacramento, CA: California Coalition Against Sexual Assault.
14.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Offender Information Services Branch. (2007). Movement of prison population: Calendar year 2006. Sacramento, CA : California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
15.
Fleming, K., Hirsch, W., Lal, R., Piper, J., Sharma, A., Shimada, T., et al. (2005). Understanding the challenges of offender reentry in Allegheny County, phase II: Human services supply gaps and policy simulation model. Pittsburgh, PA: Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University.
16.
Gottfredson, S.D., & Gottfredson, D.C. (1986). Accuracy of prediction models. In Criminal Careers and "Career Criminals." Vol. II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Greenwood, P.W., Rydell, C.P., Abrahamse, A.F., Caulkins, J.P., Chiesa, J., Model, K.E., et al. (1994). Three strikes and you’re out: Estimated benefits and costs of California’s new mandatory-sentencing law. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
18.
Gregory, P.M., Malka, E.S., Kostis, J.B., Wilson, A.C., Arora, J.K., & Rhoads, G.G. ( 2000). Impact of geographic proximity to cardiac revascularization services on service utilization. Medical Care, 38, 45-57.
19.
Harrison, P.M., & Beck, A.J. ( 2006). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ 213133).
20.
Hausman, J.A., Hall, B.H., & Griliches, Z. ( 1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), 909-938.
21.
Hess, D.B. ( 2005). Access to employment for adults in poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara region. Urban Studies, 42, 1177-1200.
22.
La Vigne, N.G., Kachnowski, V., Travis, J., Naser, R., & Visher, C. ( 2003). A portrait of prisoner reentry in Maryland. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
La Vigne, N., Wolf, S.J., & Jannetta, J. ( 2004). Voices of experience: Focus group findings on prisoner reentry in the state of Rhode Island. Washington, DC: Urban Institute: Justice Policy Center.
24.
Lin, J., & Turner, S. ( 2007). Considering secure reentry centers in California. Irvine, CA: Center for Evidence-Based Corrections.
25.
Lynch, J.P., & Sabol, W.J. ( 2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
26.
Moss, P., & Tilly, C. ( 1996). ‘Soft’ skills and race: An investigation of Black men’s employment problems. Work and Occupation , 23, 252-276.
27.
National Research Council. (2007). Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
28.
Pager, D., & Quillian, L. ( 2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70, 355-380.
29.
Pager, D. ( 2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975.
30.
Painter, G., Gabriel, S., & Myers, D. ( 2001). Race, immigrant status, and housing tenure choice. Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 150-167.
31.
Pearce, J., Witten, K., Hiscock, R., & Blakely, T. ( 2007). Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources? International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 348-355.
32.
Petersilia, J. ( 2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry . New York: Oxford.
33.
Piette, J.D., & Moos, R.H. ( 1996). The influence of distance on ambulatory care use, death, and readmission following a myocardial infraction. Health Services Research, 31, 573-591.
34.
Raphael, S., & Stoll, M.A. ( 2004). The effect of prison releases on regional crime rates . Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 207-255.
35.
Sabol, W.J., & Harrison, P.M. (2007). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ 217675).
36.
Solomon, A.L., Thomson, G.L., & Keegan, S. ( 2004). Prisoner reentry in Michigan. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
37.
Uggen, C. ( 2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529-546.
38.
Visher, C., & Courtney, S.M.E. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
39.
Visher, C., & Farrell, J. ( 2005). Chicago communities and prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
40.
Visher, C., Palmer, T., & Gouvis Roman, C. (2007). Cleveland stakeholders’ perceptions of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
41.
Watson, J., Solomon, A.L., La Vigne, N.G., Travis, J., Funches, M., & Parthasarathy, B. (2004). A portrait of prisoner reentry in Texas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
42.
Weiss, J.E., & Greenlick, M.R. (2007). Determinants of medical care utilization: The effect of social class and distance on contacts with the medical care system. Medical Care, 8, 456-462.
43.
Wexler, H., DeLeon, G., Thomas, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. ( 1999). The Amity Prison TC Evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 147-167.
44.
Williams, J.H., Pierce, R., Young, N.S., & Van Dorn, R.A. (2001). Service utilization in high-crime communities: Consumer views on supports and barriers. Families in Society, 82, 409-417.
45.
Zhang, S.X., Roberts, R.E.L., & Callanan, V.J. (2006). Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 551-571.
