In this article, deviant action is analyzed on the basis of ideas derived from Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theory. Presumedly, self-control in interaction with opportunities can explain deviant action. This assumption is elaborated using the concept of high- and low-cost situations from rational choice theory. From this point of view, the hypotheses are that self-control predicts deviant action in low-cost situations, whereas utility predicts deviant action in high-cost situations. Two test strategies are employed in an empirical examination of these hypotheses. A standardized questionnaire was presented to a sample of 494 German adults aged 18 to 80. The results of both test strategies show that the assumptions of an interaction effect between self-control and opportunities are fundamentally supported.
Abelson, R.P. ( 1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. S. Carrol & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behaviour (pp. 33-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Arneklev, B.J., Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., & Bursik, R.J., Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
4.
Bachmann, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. ( 1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review , 26, 343-372.
5.
Baron, S.W. ( 2003). Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 403-425.
6.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. ( 1997). Der Einfluß des Bildungssystems auf den Heiratsmarkt. [The influence of the educational system on the marriage market). Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 49, 440-476.
7.
Bollen, K.A. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A.M. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 14, 243-264.
9.
Chapple, C.L., & Hope, T.L. ( 2003). An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of gang and dating violence offenders. Violence and Victims , 18, 671-690.
10.
Clarke, R.V. ( 1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and praxis. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136-147.
11.
Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston .
12.
Clarke, R.V., & Cornish, D.B. ( 1985). Modelling offenders decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.
13.
Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
14.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.
15.
DeLi, S. ( 2004). The impacts of self-control and social bonds on juvenile delinquency in a national sample of midadolescents. Deviant Behavior, 25, 351-373.
16.
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1992). Persönliches Umweltverhalten. Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Ecology in everyday life. Inconsistencies between environmental attitudes and behavior]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44, 226-251.
17.
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Umweltbewußtsein und Umweltverhalten in Low- und High-Cost-Situationen. Eine empirische Überprüfung der Low-Cost-Hypothese [Environmental consciousness and environmental behavior in low-cost and in high-cost situations An empirical examination of the low-cost hypothesis]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 438-453.
18.
Dugan, L., LaFree, G.S., & Piquero, A.R. ( 2005). Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings . Criminology, 43, 1031-1065.
19.
Eifler, S. ( 1998). Machen Gelegenheiten Raucher? Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Beziehungen zwischen Self-Control, Ressourcen und dem Genuß von Tabakwaren [Do opportunities make smokers? Theoretical and empirical analyses of self-control, opportunities and tobacco smoking]. Soziale Probleme, 9, 90-116.
20.
Eifler, S. ( 1999). Routineaktivitäten und Gelegenheiten. Eine quasi-experimentelle Untersuchung situativer Einflüsse auf deviantes Verhalten [Routine activities and opportunities. An experimental analysis of situational influences on deviance] . Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
21.
Eifler, S. ( 2000). Zu einer empirisch begründeten Taxonomie von Gelegenheiten [Toward an empirically founded taxonomy of opportunities]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
22.
Eifler, S. ( 2002). Finders are keepers-Empirical examinations of criminal opportunities using scenario techniques. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
23.
Eifler, S. ( 2007). Evaluating the validity of self-reported deviant behavior using vignette analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41, 303-318.
24.
Eifler, S., Schmitt, S., Bentrup, C., Hegeler, M., Pessara, I., Porr, C., et al. (2001). Gelegenheitsstrukturen und Kriminalität [Opportunities and crime]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
25.
Farrington, D.P. ( 1995). The development of offending and antisocial behavior from childhood: The key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1-36.
26.
Fetchenhauer, D., & Simon, J. ( 1998). Eine experimentelle Überprüfung der "General Theory of Crime" von Gottfredson und Hirschi [An experimental analyis of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s "general theory of crime"]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 81, 301-315.
27.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Glaser, D. ( 1971). Social deviance. Chicago: Markham.
29.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., Jr., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfresdson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
31.
Heider, F. ( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M.R. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
33.
Hope, T.L., & Chapple, C.L. ( 2005). Maternal characteristics, parenting, and adolescent sexual behavior: The role of self-control. Deviant Behavior26, 25-45.
34.
Jacobs, B. ( 1996). Crack dealers and restrictive deterrence: Identifying NARCS. Criminology, 34, 409-431.
Kliemt, H. ( 1986). The veil of insignificance. European Journal of Political Economy, 2, 333-344.
37.
Kühnel, S., & Bamberg, S. ( 1998). Ist die Low-Cost Hypothese noch zu retten? Erwiderung auf Diekmann und Preisendörfer [Is the low-cost hypothesis still alive? A reply to Diekmann and Preisendörfer]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 273-275.
38.
LaFree, G., & Birkbeck, C. ( 1991). The neglected situation: A cross-national study of the situational characteristics of crime. Criminology, 29, 73-98.
39.
Lamnek, S. ( 1994). Neue Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens [Developments in criminological theory]. München, Germany: Fink.
40.
Longshore, D. ( 1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102-113.
41.
Longshore, D., & Turner, S. ( 1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity. Cross-sectional test of the general theory of crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 81-98.
42.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J.A. ( 1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
43.
Magnusson, D. ( 1978). On the role of situations in personality research: An international perspective. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Current controversies and issues in personality (pp. 155-178). New York: John Wiley.
44.
Magnusson, D., & Ekehammar, B. ( 1978). Similar situations-Similar behaviors? A study of the intraindividual congruence between situation perception and situation reactions . Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 41-48.
45.
Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. ( 1981). Stability of cross-situational patterns of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 488-496.
46.
Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review , 27, 467-498.
47.
Piquero, A.R., & Rosay, A.B. ( 1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale: A comment on Longshore et al. Criminology , 36, 157-73.
48.
Piquero, A.R., & Tibbetts, S.G. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effect of low self-control and situational factor in offenders decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
49.
Preisendörfer, P. ( 1999). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 1996. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage [Environmental consciousness in Germany in 1996. Results from an representative study]. Bonn, Germany: Bundesumweltministerium.
50.
Reed, G.E., & Yeager, P.C. ( 1996). Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime. Criminology , 34, 357-382.
51.
Rossi, P.H., & Anderson, A.B. (1982). The factorial survey approach. An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgements (pp. 15-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Savage, L.J. ( 1954). The foundation of statistics. New York: John Wiley.
53.
Seipel, C. ( 1999a). Die Bedeutung von Gelegenheitsstrukturen in der General Theory of Crime von Michael R. Gottfredson & Travis Hirschi (1990) [The relevance of opportunity in the general theory of crime of Michael R. Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi (1990)]. Soziale Probleme, 10, 144-165.
54.
Seipel, C. ( 1999b). Strategien und Probleme des empirischen Theorienvergleichs in den Sozialwissenschaften. Rational Choice Theorie oder Persönlichkeitstheorie? [Strategies and problems within an empirical comparison of theories]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
55.
Seipel, C. ( 2000). Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen der Theorie geplanten Verhaltens von Icek Ajzen und der Allgemeinen Theorie der Kriminalität von Michael R. Gottfredson und Travis Hirschi [An empirical comparison of the theory of planned behavior of Icek Ajzen and the general theory of crime of Michael R Gottfrdson and Travis Hirschi]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 29, 399-412.
56.
Simon, H.A. ( 1957). Models of man. New York: John Wiley.
57.
Simpson, S.S., Piquero, N.L., & Paternoster, R. (1998). Exploring the micro-macro link in corporate crime research. In P. Bamberger & W. J. Sonnenstuhl (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 35-68). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.
58.
Statistisches Bundesamt [ Federal Statistical Office]. (Ed.). (2001). Datenreport 1999 [Data report 1999]. Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
59.
Tibbetts, S.G., & Myers, D.L. ( 1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating . American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
60.
Tittle, C.R., & Botchkovar, E.V. (2005). Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43, 307-354.
61.
Vazsonyi, A.T. ( 2003). Parent-adolescent relations and problem behaviors: Hungary, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United States. Marriage & Family Review, 35, 161-187.
62.
Vowell, P.R., & Chen, J. ( 2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 226-249.
63.
Wright, R.T., & Decker, S.H. ( 1994). Burglars on the job. Streetlife and residential breakins . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
64.
Wright, R.T., & Decker, S.H. ( 1997). Armed robbers in action. Stickups and street culture . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
65.
Yeager, P.C., & Reed, G.E. ( 1998). Of corporate persons and straw men: A reply to Herbert, Green, and Larragoite. Criminology, 36, 885-897.
66.
Zintl, R. ( 1989). Der Homo Oeconomicus: Ausnahmeerscheinung in jeder Situation oder Jedermann in Ausnahmesituationen? [Economic man: An exception in each situation or everybody in exceptional situations?]. Analyse und Kritik, 11, 52-69.
