Although prior research has contributed to understanding of the factors that influence sexual assault case processing, it has primarily been viewed through the prosecutorial lens. The authors assert that a prosecutor’s charging decision involves not only a decision to file or reject the charge but, assuming that the case is not rejected, also a decision regarding the charge that should be filed. Accordingly, they examined the congruence between the charge filed by police at arrest with the charge filed by the prosecutor. The results indicate that charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases is governed by a legal sufficiency framework in Philadelphia, where a specialized charging unit receives cases after decisions to charge have been made, and a trial sufficiency framework in Kansas City, Missouri, where a specialized unit makes the decision to charge and uses vertical prosecution from screening through disposition.
Albonetti, C. ( 1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty . Law & Society Review, 21, 291-313.
2.
Battelle Memorial Institute Law and Justice Center. ( 1977). Forcible rape: A national survey of the response by prosecutors . Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. ( 2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461-498.
4.
Bryden, D.P., & Lengnick, S. ( 1997). Rape in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 1194-1384.
5.
Estrich, S. ( 1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Fazlollah, M., Matza, M., McCoy, C., & Benson, C. ( 1999, October 17). Women victimized twice in police game of numbers. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved from http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/crime/html/sch101799.asp
7.
Feeney, F., Dill, F., & Weir, A. ( 1983). Arrests without conviction: How often do they occur and why?Washington, DC: National Institute on Justice.
8.
Frazier, P.A., & Haney, B. ( 1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
9.
Frohmann, L. ( 1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems , 38, 213-226.
10.
Frohmann, L. ( 1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law and Society Review, 31, 531-555.
11.
Hawkins, D. ( 1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 1, 207-230.
12.
Horney, J., & Spohn, C. ( 1996). The influence of blame and believability factors in the processing of simple versus aggravated rape cases. Criminology , 34, 135-162.
13.
Jacoby, J.E. ( 1976). The prosecutor’s charging decision: A policy perspective . Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14.
Jacoby, J.E. ( 1980). The American prosecutor: A search for identity. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15.
Jacoby, J.L., Ratledge, E.L., & Turner, S. ( 1982). Prosecutorial decision-making: A national study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
16.
Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. ( 1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
Kerstetter, W. ( 1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Criminology, 81, 267-313.
18.
Kingsnorth, R., Lopez, J., Wentworth, J., & Cummings, D. ( 1998). Adult sexual assault: The role of racial/ethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice , 26, 359-371.
19.
Kingsnorth, R., MacIntosh, R., & Wentworth, J. ( 1999). Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Quarterly, 16, 275-302.
20.
LaFree, G. ( 1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45, 842-854.
21.
LaFree, G. ( 1989). Rape and criminal justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
22.
LaFree, G.D. ( 1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28, 582-594.
23.
Mather, L. ( 1979). Plea bargaining or trial?Lexington, MA: Heath.
24.
McCahill, T.W., Meyer, L.C., & Fischman, A.M. (1979). The aftermath of rape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
McCoy, C., Matza, M., & Fazlollah, M. ( 2000). Police reopen thousands of dumped cases: Forty-five detectives are reinvestigating more than 2,000 sex offenses that were improperly downgraded since ’95. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved from http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/crime/html/011600prape.asp
26.
Miller, F. ( 1969). Prosecution: The decision to charge a suspect with a crime. Boston: Little, Brown.
27.
Myers, M. ( 1982). Common law in action: The prosecution of felonies and misdemeanors. Sociological Inquiry, 52, 1-15.
28.
Nagel, I., & Hagan, J. ( 1983). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 4, pp. 91-144). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
29.
Neubauer, D. ( 1974). After the arrest: The charging decision in Prairie City . Law and Society Review, 8, 475-517.
30.
Paternoster, R. ( 1984). Prosecutorial discretion in requesting the death penalty: A case of victim-based racial discrimination. Law and Society Review, 18, 437-478.
31.
Raftery, A. ( 1996). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (Vol. 25, pp. 111-195). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
32.
Rauma, D. ( 1984). Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision-making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321-351.
33.
Reskin, B., & Visher, C. ( 1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors’ decisions. Law and Society Review, 20, 423-438.
34.
Schmidt, J., & Steury, E.H. ( 1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
35.
Spears, J., & Spohn, C. ( 1997). Prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14, 501-524.
36.
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. ( 1987). The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology , 25, 175-191.
37.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-688.
38.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. ( 1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly , 13, 649-679.
39.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interactions of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
40.
Swiggert, V.L., & Farrell, R.A. ( 1976). Murder, inequality, and the law. Lexington, MA: Heath.
41.
Vera Institute of Justice. (1981). Felony arrests: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City’s courts. New York: Longman.
