“Get tough” approaches for responding to sex crimes have proliferated during the past decade. Child pornography in particular has garnered attention in recent years. Policy makers increasingly have emphasized incarceration as a response to such crime, including accessing child pornography. Juxtaposed against such efforts is a dearth of knowledge about “get tough” policies for responding to sex crimes, particularly those targeting children, and how most appropriately to respond to such crimes. The authors examine data from a national telephone survey of Americans to explore views toward sex crimes, with a special emphasis on crimes against children. The findings indicate the public supports tough responses to child sex crimes, but they also support treatment of sex offenders. Also, despite views that incarceration is an appropriate response to possessing child pornography, several social and demographic cleavages in such support exist. The authors discuss these findings and their implications for policy and research.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2006). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
3.
Applegate, B.K., Cullen, F.T., Fisher, B.S., & Ven, T.V. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38, 719-753.
4.
Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bedarf, A.R. (1995). Examining sex offender community notification laws. California_Law Review, 83, 885-939.
6.
Beutel, A.M., & Marini, M.M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60, 436-448.
7.
Brick, M.J., & Waksberg, J. (1991). Avoiding sequential sampling with random digit dialing. Survey Methodology, 17, 27-41.
8.
Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders . Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 239-252.
9.
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29-40.
10.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2000a). Myths and facts about sex offenders. Silver Spring, MD : Author.
11.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2000b). Public opinion and the criminal justice system: Building support for sex offender management programs. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
12.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2006). Understanding treatment for adults and juveniles who have committed sex offenses . Silver Spring, MD: Author.
13.
Chiricos, T., Welch, K., & Gertz, M. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 359-389.
14.
Cullen, F.T., Fisher, B.S., & Applegate, B.K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1-79.
15.
Cullen, F.T., Skovron, S.E., Scott, J.E., & Burton, V.S., Jr. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6-18.
16.
Cullen, F.T., Wright, J.P., Brown, S., Moon, M.M., Blankenship, M.B., & Applegate, B.K. (1998). Public support for early intervention programs: Implications for a progressive policy agenda. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 187-204.
17.
DeMaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Finkelhor, D., & Ormrod, R. (2004). Child pornography: Patterns from NIBRS. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
19.
Flanagan, T.J. (1996). Public opinion and public policy in criminal justice . In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Flanagan, T. J., & Longmire, D. R. (Eds.). (1996). Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Goodnough, A., & Davey, M. (2007, March 6). For sex offenders, dispute on therapy's benefits. The New York Times, p. A1.
23.
Greene, J., & Doble, J. (2000). Attitudes towards crime and punishment in Vermont: Public opinion about an experiment with restorative justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: John Doble Research Associates .
24.
Greenhouse, L. (2007, February 27). Justices decline case on 200-year sentence for man who possessed child pornography. The New York Times, p. A13.
25.
Hogan, M.J., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2005). Economic insecurity, blame, and punitive attitudes . Justice Quarterly, 22, 392-412.
26.
Hogue, T.E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders . Issues in Criminology and Legal Psychology, 19, 27-32.
27.
Hurwitz, J., & Smithey, S. (1998). Gender and differences on crime and punishment . Political Research Quarterly, 51, 89-115.
28.
Internal Revenue Service. (2006). IRS data book, Publication 55b. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05databk.pdf
29.
Jenkins, P. (2001). Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet . New York: New York University Press.
30.
Jewkes, Y., & Andrews, C. (2005). Policing the filth: The problems of investigating online child pornography in England and Wales. Policing and Society, 15, 42-62.
31.
Keeter, S. (2006). The impact of cell phone non-coverage bias on polling in the 2004 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 88-98.
32.
Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly , 70, 759-779.
33.
Kingston, P.W., & Finkel, S.E. (1987). Is there a marriage gap in politics? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 57-64.
34.
Lavrakas, P.J. (1987). Telephone survey methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Logan, W.A. (2003). Sex offender registration and community notification: Emerging legal and research issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 337-351.
36.
Maahs, J., & Liederbach, J. (2007). Surfing for porn: Obscenity and the Internet. In C. Hemmens (Ed.), Current legal issues in criminal justice (pp. 251-624). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
37.
Manza, J., Brooks, C., & Uggen, C. (2004). Public attitudes toward felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 275-286.
38.
Marin, G., & Marin, B.V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
McCorkle, R.C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 240-252.
40.
McCulloch, T., & Kelly, L. (2007). Working with sex offenders in context: Which way forward? Probation Journal, 54, 7-21.
41.
Mears, D.P. (2001). Getting tough with juvenile offenders: Explaining support for sanctioning youths as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 206-226.
42.
Mears, D.P., Hay, C., Gertz, M., & Mancini, C. (2007). Public opinion and the foundation of the juvenile court. Criminology, 45, 223-258.
43.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Miethe, T.D., Olson, J., & Mitchell, O. (2006). Specialization and persistence in the arrest histories of sex offenders: A comparative analysis of alternative measures and offense types. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 204-229.
45.
Moon, M.M., Wright, J.P., Cullen, F.T., & Pealer, J. (2000). Putting kids to death: Specifying public support for juvenile capital punishment. Justice Quarterly, 17, 663-684.
46.
Nagin, D.S., Piquero, A.R., Scott, E.S., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 627-652.
Ost, S. (2002). Children at risk: Legal and societal perceptions of the potential threat that the possession of child pornography poses to society. Journal of Law and Society, 29, 436-460.
49.
Pew Research Center. (2006). National polls not undermined: The cell phone challenge. Washington, DC: Author.
50.
Phillips, D.M. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington's citizens. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
51.
Plutzer, E., & McBurnett, M. (1991). Family life and American politics: The "marriage gap" reconsidered. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 113-127.
52.
Pratt, J. (2000). Sex crimes and the new punitiveness. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 135-151.
53.
Quinn, J.F., Forsyth, C.J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215-232.
54.
Roberts, J.V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Crime and Justice, 16, 99-180.
55.
Roberts, J.V., & Hough, M. (2005). The state of the prisons: Exploring public knowledge and opinion. The Howard Journal, 44, 286-306.
56.
Roberts, J.V., & Stalans, L.J. (1998). Crime, criminal justice, and public opinion. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 31-57). New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Roberts, J.V., Stalans, L.J., Indermaur, D., & Hough, M. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Roncek, D.W., & Swatt, M.L. (2006). For those who like odds: A direct interpretation of the logit coefficient for continuous variables. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 731-738.
59.
Sample, L.L., & Bray, T.M. (2003). Are sex offenders dangerous?Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 59-82.
60.
Silvia, P.J. (2003). Throwing away the key: Measuring prison reform attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2553-2564.
61.
Sims, B., & Johnston, E. (2004). Examining public opinion about crime and justice: A statewide study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 270-293.
62.
Sims, B., & Reynolds, M. (2007). Sex offender registration, notification, and civil commitment statutes: Due process vs. community safety. In C. Hemmens (Ed.), Current legal issues in criminal justice (pp. 195-204). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
63.
Sundt, J.L., Cullen, F.T., Applegate, B.K., & Turner, M.G. (1998). The tenacity of the rehabilitative ideal revisited: Have attitudes toward offender treatment changed? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 426-442.
64.
Taylor, D.G., Scheppele, K.L., & Stinchcombe, A.L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26, 413-424.
65.
Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67-81.
66.
Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775-802.
67.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Population distribution in 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
68.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007a). Table 1: Annual estimates of the population by sex and five-year age groups for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (NC-EST2005-01). Washington, DC: Author.
69.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007b). Table 2: Annual estimates of the population by selected age groups and sex for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (NC-EST2005-02). Washington, DC: Author.
70.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007c). Table 3: Annual estimates of the population by sex, race and Hispanic or Latino origin for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (NC-EST2005-03) . Washington, DC: Author.
71.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). File-sharing programs: Child pornography is readily accessible over peer-to-peer networks. Washington, DC: Author .
72.
Unnever, J.D., & Cullen, F.T. (2007). Reassessing the racial divide in support for capital punishment: The continuing significance of race. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 124-158.
73.
Waksberg, J. (1978). Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 40-46.
74.
Weisberg, H.F., Krosnick, J.A., & Bowen, B.D. (1989). An introduction to survey research and data analysis . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .
75.
Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2006). Child pornography on the Internet. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
76.
Wright, R.G. (2003). Sex offender registration and notification: Public attention, political emphasis, and fear [Electronic version]. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 97-104.
